Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:steve@karinya.net: 407 ]

Total 407 documents matching your query.

181. Re: [TowerTalk] Quarter wave baluns (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 09:01:45 +0100
Dan, Some time ago I challenged G0KSC on a balun issue - you can read the discussion here: http://www.g0ksc.co.uk/forum/2-antenna-discussions-here/122-pawsey-stub-error.html You might want to read th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-09/msg00201.html (8,461 bytes)

182. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m "T" antenna loading coil. (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 13:05:47 +0000
I make it about 60uH if everything is constructed from #14 bare copper wire. That would vary if the vertical section was tubing. 73, Steve G3TXQ _______________________________________________ ______
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-11/msg00094.html (8,192 bytes)

183. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m "T" antenna loading coil. (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 16:58:00 +0000
A loading coil at the base of the vertical section doesn't alter Rrad, but one positioned at the top of the vertical section *does*, by altering the current distribution. With the dimensions given, a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-11/msg00119.html (7,490 bytes)

184. Re: [TowerTalk] Bazooka antenna (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 09:24:35 +0000
Tom, Wanted signals are EM waves; noise signals are also EM waves. I wonder what characteristic of a Double Bazooka might allow it to distinguish wanted EM waves from unwanted ones in a way that a co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-11/msg00139.html (8,235 bytes)

185. Re: [TowerTalk] verticlas used on multiple bands fed with a tuner (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:12:01 +0000
Mark, I guess a couple of considerations would be the variation in radiation elevation pattern and the feedpoint impedance - can the tuner handle it? If we take as a benchmark a quarter-wave vertical
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-11/msg00253.html (9,014 bytes)

186. Re: [TowerTalk] verticlas used on multiple bands fed with a tuner (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:21:28 +0000
Here's the signal strength at 10 degrees elevation from a 43ft vertical, referenced to the value on 40m: 30m: +0.8dB 20m: +3.0dB 17m: -0.1dB 15m: -2.2dB 12m: -1.6dB 10m: -1.8dB OK, it falls off a bit
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-11/msg00270.html (8,507 bytes)

187. Re: [TowerTalk] Cost effectivel Tower height (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 19:16:14 +0000
I think we sometimes concentrate too much on looking at antenna heights that will maximise gain at certain take-off angles, and forget about the nulls. Those deep elevation nulls can be "killers" if
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00016.html (34,729 bytes)

188. Re: [TowerTalk] Cost effective Tower height (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 15:17:41 +0000
"single multiband beam 40 - 10. No stacks." Steve G3TXQ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00025.html (7,447 bytes)

189. Re: [TowerTalk] Cost effective Tower height (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 16:09:23 +0000
Plus - the second antenna might not need to cover all the bands if he chooses the heights carefully. Steve G3TXQ _______________________________________________ ______________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00030.html (8,384 bytes)

190. Re: [TowerTalk] Pattern Distortion caused by faulty balun? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 15:06:16 +0000
Tony, Yes, it's possible if the conducted common-mode path happens to be low impedance compared to the Yagi impedance, and if the balun fails in a way that allows large common-mode current to flow. B
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00803.html (7,932 bytes)

191. Re: [TowerTalk] Pattern Distortion caused by faulty balun? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 20:11:08 +0000
Tony, I made some azimuth plot measurements on my hexbeam with various CM choke arrangements, including "none": http://www.karinya.net/g3txq/hexbeam/common_mode/ The most sensitive indicator of CM is
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00851.html (9,419 bytes)

192. Re: [TowerTalk] Pattern Distortion caused by faulty balun? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2012 21:57:54 +0000
Tony, It would be the length from the feedpoint to the ground; you also need to factor in the Common-Mode velocity factor of the line - probably in the range 0.95 to 0.99. If I model that feedline le
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-01/msg00009.html (8,174 bytes)

193. Re: [TowerTalk] Pattern Distortion caused by faulty balun? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 08:32:58 +0000
John, All that I've ever measured lie in the range 0.95 to 0.99. Did you notice that I said *COMMON-MODE* velocity factor? Signals flowing on the outside of the braid are Common-Mode signals - signal
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-01/msg00013.html (9,323 bytes)

194. Re: [TowerTalk] Pattern Distortion caused by faulty balun? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 10:35:24 +0000
Jim, I frequently talk to folk who question the utility of CM chokes at the antenna feedpoint. I find that one or more of the following questions usually helps them "see the light": 1. Would you inte
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-01/msg00015.html (10,349 bytes)

195. Re: [TowerTalk] PL259 Insertion Loss? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 17:15:50 +0000
Not a direct answer to your question, but from Dan's (N3OX) web site: http://n3ox.net/files/23_adapters_28400kHz.jpg 23 connectors/adaptors including UHF types, 0.08dB loss on 10m 73, Steve G3TXQ ___
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-01/msg00225.html (8,866 bytes)

196. Re: [TowerTalk] PL259 Insertion Loss? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 17:45:39 +0000
K7FR ran an experiment in the measurements lab at Washington State University, passing 1kW through a PL259/SO239 pair and measuring the loss with a calorimeter. He measured 1.8W loss at 30MHz: that's
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-01/msg00233.html (7,705 bytes)

197. Re: [TowerTalk] PL259 Insertion Loss? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 14:57:23 +0000
I just did a short experiment at 28MHz, concentrating on the mismatch issue: AIM4170 Analyser (N-type) connected directly to precision load (N-type): Z = 49.916 - j0.28 Rho = 0.00293 SWR = 1.006 Then
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-01/msg00260.html (8,288 bytes)

198. Re: [TowerTalk] PL259 Insertion Loss? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:26:24 +0000
Just to illustrate that last point: Consider a perfect 50 Ohm load connected to a source through three 6ft lengths of 50 Ohm lossless coax with Vf=0.66. The three lengths of coax are joined with two
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-01/msg00261.html (9,595 bytes)

199. Re: [TowerTalk] PL259 Insertion Loss? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:28:49 +0000
Whoops - forgot to say: all that was calculated for a frequency of 28MHz. 73, Steve G3TXQ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mai
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-01/msg00262.html (8,154 bytes)

200. Re: [TowerTalk] PL259 Insertion Loss? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:24:19 +0000
Fred, If you had 0.3dB loss in a connector I doubt you or the guy at the other end would hear the difference. But if you ran 1.5kW through it you'd probably smell the difference! 100w is a lot of pow
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-01/msg00294.html (10,713 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu