Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:steve@karinya.net: 407 ]

Total 407 documents matching your query.

381. Re: [TowerTalk] Fair rite materials for choke baluns (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 16:03:35 +0100
What I do is connect the choke across the output of a tuner to generate a CM signal across the winding. Adjust the tuner for a good match to 50 Ohms and drive it from a transmitter. That way you have
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-07/msg00051.html (10,730 bytes)

382. Re: [TowerTalk] Fair rite materials for choke baluns (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 17:49:48 +0100
Jim, I worried that the choke impedance might be too high to be matched by the tuner, but my TenTec 238 matches that Type 52 choke easily from 7MHz thru 30MHz, including resonance where its impedance
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-07/msg00062.html (10,694 bytes)

383. Re: [TowerTalk] Fair rite materials for choke baluns (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 19:00:30 +0100
Do the maths on saturation - you'll find that core overheating occurs well before saturation for the duty-cycles typical of Ham operation. To quote Amidon: "Overheating of the core will usually take
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-07/msg00068.html (11,252 bytes)

384. Re: [TowerTalk] Fair rite materials for choke baluns (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 08:31:43 +0100
Note what I said about duty cycles! Steve G3TXQ To quote Amidon: "Overheating of the core will usually take place long before saturation in most applications above 100kHz." Steve G3TXQ This generaliz
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-07/msg00085.html (11,945 bytes)

385. Re: [TowerTalk] Losses in parallel coax (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 19:32:56 +0100
Hans, The key qualifier is that the **matched** loss of the combined pair is equal to the **matched** loss of the individual coaxes! The trick is that Zo has changed between the individual case and t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-08/msg00038.html (10,064 bytes)

386. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax Losses on 160 and 75? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:40:33 +0100
You can also measure loss using a single-port analyser. The underpinning maths is here: http://www.karinya.net/g3txq/wet_ll/tl_formulas.pdf Steve G3TXQ On 06/08/2016 07:03, Richard (Rick) Karlquist w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-08/msg00182.html (9,751 bytes)

387. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax Losses on 160 and 75? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:59:07 +0100
With a short circuit termination, the line needs to be an even number of quarter-waves long; with an open termination the line needs to be an odd number of quarter-waves long. For the short-circuit t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-08/msg00186.html (9,426 bytes)

388. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax Losses on 160 and 75? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 08:06:31 +0100
Some of the accuracy issues can be explored using Dan's excellent TLD software. Say we had 150ft of Belden 9201 which we were trying to characterise for loss on 160m; TLD predicts a matched loss of 0
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-08/msg00190.html (9,515 bytes)

389. Re: [TowerTalk] SWR and voltage (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 16:38:43 +0100
Steve, Firstly your figures are out for the 50 Ohm system; the figures are 273.9V and 5.5A Once the SWR is no longer 1:1, there is an infinite range of impedances for any particular SWR, and therefor
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00443.html (9,008 bytes)

390. Re: [TowerTalk] SWR and voltage (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 16:42:48 +0100
Steve, Those were rms figures of course; if you need peak values, multiply by 1.414 Steve G3TXQ Firstly your figures are out for the 50 Ohm system; the figures are 273.9V and 5.5A Once the SWR is no
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00444.html (8,327 bytes)

391. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna resonance question (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 16:45:52 +0000
You need to define what you mean by "ring". The antenna will see a conjugate match at 1.85MHz (not 2.24MHz) looking back towards the station end, but I don't know if that's what you mean by "ring"? S
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-12/msg00174.html (8,537 bytes)

392. Re: [TowerTalk] Double Coax Runs to Reduce Loss? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:33:33 +0000
Mike, This member of the "TT community" says that, if you parallel connect the two lengths - outer to outer, and centre to centre, at each end - you'll have a 25 Ohm line with _the exact same_ matche
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-12/msg00208.html (8,203 bytes)

393. Re: [TowerTalk] current balun question (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 16:25:11 +0000
It's worth remembering that the equations involve _vector_ sums. So just because the current _amplitudes_ in the two legs of a TL might be equal in the two directions, it doesn't mean they are balanc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-03/msg00285.html (10,435 bytes)

394. Re: [TowerTalk] common mode chokes, baluns and multiband doublets (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 12:12:26 +0000
Bill, I use a very similar antenna system. I measure best feedline current balance when I use an unbalanced tuner (Ten Tec 238) connected through a very short length of RG213 to a 1:1 CM choke mounte
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-12/msg00146.html (10,563 bytes)

395. Re: [TowerTalk] Measuring Common Mode Choke with Anritsu VNA (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2017 09:39:49 +0000
Maximo, I don't think that instrument will allow you to see the Zcm of a choke directly on-screen. However, it looks like it will display |S21| directly. With the choke connected between the two port
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-12/msg00232.html (8,399 bytes)

396. Re: [TowerTalk] Measuring Common Mode Choke with Anritsu VNA (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2018 10:00:46 +0000
Maximo, A test I use to assess the capacitance added by the test jig is as follows: Wind a high-Q air-cored coil and connect a small-value parallel capacitor across it. Measure its resonant frequency
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-01/msg00000.html (8,057 bytes)

397. Re: [TowerTalk] Measuring Common Mode Choke with Anritsu VNA (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 11:25:29 +0000
Wes, Thanks, I hadn't spotted that one! Steve G3TXQ On 03/01/2018 19:40, Wes Stewart wrote: On 1/1/2018 3:00 AM, Steve Hunt wrote: ... The problem is that models picturing capacitance between adjacen
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-01/msg00019.html (10,665 bytes)

398. Re: [TowerTalk] Measuring Common Mode Choke with Anritsu VNA (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 11:30:33 +0000
For completeness, here's the data referred to by G3RBJ in his paper: http://www.g3ynh.info/zdocs/magnetics/appendix/Toroid_selfC.html Notice how the self-capacitance falls as the number of turns incr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-01/msg00020.html (9,752 bytes)

399. Re: [TowerTalk] Measuring Common Mode Choke with Anritsu VNA (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 12:43:03 +0000
Hi Paul, No, I no longer use the 50 Ohm termination at the jig. I originally included it because I was using long RG174 patch leads between the VNA and the jig and wanted to minimise coax loss at the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-01/msg00022.html (11,224 bytes)

400. Re: [TowerTalk] Measuring Common Mode Choke with Anritsu VNA (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 10:30:33 +0000
Measuring high-Z chokes accurately is challenging, and it's easy to become obsessive about this stuff. I know because I'm probably one of the worst offenders :) But then I ask myself:: if an uncompen
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-01/msg00024.html (10,009 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu