Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:steve.root@culligan4water.com: 261 ]

Total 261 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [CQ-Contest] Use of di-di-dah-dah-di-dit in CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 02:46:50 +0000
OK....I call CQ and I have a weak station answering me, who then gets clobbered by an impatient S&P guy who sends "?" on top of the caller? That drives me nuts. Hold off on the "?" and wait 3 seconds
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00181.html (13,505 bytes)

142. Re: [CQ-Contest] Quad Antennas performance for Contesting (score: 1)
Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:10:03 +0000
I'd agree. I've made and used fiberglass covered Bamboo Quad spreaders. They worked well and lasted for many years. But they were hard to make, they were very heavy, and fiberglass resin is nasty stu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00535.html (10,465 bytes)

143. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL and Open Logs - Time for the next step? (score: 1)
Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:21:13 +0000
Perhaps, in the ARRL's view, the results of a single contest only matter for 12 months, while DXCC records are "forever". Therefore validated contact information in LOTW would assume a higher priorit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00257.html (11,159 bytes)

144. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL and Open Logs - Time for the next step? (score: 1)
Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:57:09 +0000
I personally don't think open logs are any big threat, on the other hand I don't see any good application for them either. Propagation is so very different from one year to the next. In the 2001 CQWW
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00294.html (9,194 bytes)

145. Re: [CQ-Contest] Lightning strikes N5OT (score: 1)
Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:29:28 +0000
Mark, You make some good points and I can see your arguments. But with all respect lets look at the other side of this. Unless you have a very good reason to think otherwise, I'd assume that you'd re
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00012.html (12,255 bytes)

146. Re: [CQ-Contest] European sigs to W9 (score: 1)
Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:52:55 +0000
Move about 16 degrees farther North and then see what 40 meters sounds like :) I thought the bands sounded horrible. The fishing last weekend, however, was excellent. Sounds like you worked a bunch o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-10/msg00258.html (9,286 bytes)

147. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW today (score: 1)
Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2008 19:38:35 +0000
Date and Contest Period: 2.1. CW: First full weekend in November (November 1-3, 2008). 2.2. Phone: Third full weekend in November (November 15-17, 2008). 2.3. Contest Period: Begins 2100 UTC Saturda
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00017.html (9,977 bytes)

148. Re: [CQ-Contest] self help during contest (score: 1)
Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 12:58:58 +0000
The big difference here...if you're logging during the contest you get that one opportunity at getting the information down right. If you use a recording, you could listen to the same QSO 17 times un
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00242.html (12,481 bytes)

149. Re: [CQ-Contest] The dupes? (score: 1)
Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:42:27 +0000
I'm usually in the camp that works the dupes and keeps on going, however in last weekend's ARRL 160 meter DX contest the number of dupes was astonishing. I had one VE3 call me seven different times.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00315.html (8,727 bytes)

150. Re: [CQ-Contest] And now for something completely different...... (score: 1)
Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 03:36:17 +0000
The most important single factor? All the guys who took the time to teach me. Elmers like W0BE, WA0PRS, W0UA, W0ZZ, N0IJ. And all the guys who have helped me now, like KQ2M or K5ZD and many others. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00033.html (9,339 bytes)

151. Re: [CQ-Contest] Where were they? (score: 1)
Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 13:25:17 +0000
Rick, Imagine a contest where no one answers your CQ's and you get beat every time you call someone. Does that sound like fun? It's awful, and that also describes Sprint from up here. With the curren
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00092.html (9,715 bytes)

152. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA February Sprint (score: 1)
Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:23:23 +0000
Even more interesting would be a break down of stations North versus South. East/West is much less significant when it comes to propagation. On the 3830 reflector, Andy N2NT asked: "...Anyone for mov
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00128.html (9,668 bytes)

153. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA February Sprint (score: 1)
Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:40:14 +0000
"Having lots of people on close to you gives you a bunch of loud easy contacts on 80m and 40 as well. " The problem with that argument is that to be competitive you have to work everyone on three ban
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00142.html (8,357 bytes)

154. Re: [CQ-Contest] RIP - K3TUP - SK (score: 1)
Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:17:54 +0000
Very sorry to hear about this. As a cancer survivor and a Ham, I felt great pride in knowing that K3TUP...one of US.....might have come up with a way to help thousands of cancer patients. I saw an in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00291.html (8,557 bytes)

155. Re: [CQ-Contest] No US DX Only - ARRL DX (score: 1)
Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:58:55 +0000
I ended up working a dozen or so stateside guys last weekend. If I had more than one of them calling me, I'd call "CQ DX Contest K0SR K0SR DX DX K". That seemed to get the point across without yellin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00375.html (8,219 bytes)

156. Re: [CQ-Contest] No US DX Only - ARRL DX (score: 1)
Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 20:32:09 +0000
Last Sunday on 20 meters I had a stateside guy that just had to call me during a European run. His suffix was IQT, I copied IQT....I called IQT and gave him a report and he never corrected the call.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00003.html (10,181 bytes)

157. [CQ-Contest] Fwd: No US DX Only - ARRL DX (score: 1)
Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 02:36:19 +0000
After receiving some off-line critisizm about this post, I realized I probably should have also mentioned that I did send this guy a card as well as a note with a few helpfull suggestions. Maybe he'l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00016.html (10,681 bytes)

158. Re: [CQ-Contest] Russian DX Contest Log Checking (score: 1)
Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:13:33 +0000
Once again I'm reminded why I NEVER read UBN reports. Life is easier if you don't worry about things you can't control. 73 Steve K0SR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00225.html (8,406 bytes)

159. [CQ-Contest] Pessimism (score: 1)
Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:53:07 +0000
Check out this week's survery question on the ARRL Website...www.arrl.org. It looks like a lot of people are seriously depressed about the lack of sunspots! 73 Steve K0SR ____________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00492.html (6,630 bytes)

160. Re: [CQ-Contest] S&P Rate (score: 1)
Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 02:43:45 +0000
When I'm in dedicated S&P mode I can FIND stations to work about as fast as Randy does. WORKING them that fast is an entirely different matter :) 73 SR _______________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00022.html (7,776 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu