Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:stevek@jmr.com: 601 ]

Total 601 documents matching your query.

181. [Towertalk] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 14:16:38 -0700
[Steve Katz] Very true, George. I wrote my comment hoping the originial party whose Grand Am became the guy anchor would read it and fall out of his chair laughing. He knows who he is, and I know he
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00452.html (7,237 bytes)

182. [Towertalk] Need Antenna Advice! (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 15:39:17 -0700
[Steve Katz] Mark, I have to agree. Unless this antenna defies all the modeling programs, using a 16' boom and fixed element locations provided in the SteppIR manual, and modeling using NEC, if I ad
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00459.html (10,750 bytes)

183. [Towertalk] Need Antenna Advice! (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 07:08:37 -0700
Three elements, the standard configuration. I realize there's a stationary 4th element available for the 6m configuration, but don't know where they put it...will try to find out. -WB2WIK/6
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00537.html (12,317 bytes)

184. [Towertalk] Need Antenna Advice! (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 07:12:53 -0700
Roger that, Mike. But modeling indicates less than 15 dB F/B as best achievable on 10m, and about 12 dB on 12m; don't think the extra 6m element will help those, although possibly it does. Anybody h
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00538.html (12,736 bytes)

185. [Towertalk] Need Antenna Advice! (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 07:22:55 -0700
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00540.html (8,952 bytes)

186. [Towertalk] more on the SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 07:27:04 -0700
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00541.html (8,127 bytes)

187. [Towertalk] The StepIR (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 07:55:14 -0700
[Steve Katz] Common problem, but it's not just "high SWR" that puts them out of service...most antennas, when covered with a lot of ice, stop working. If rotated and stopped too fast, the enormous a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00543.html (11,510 bytes)

188. [Towertalk] Handling plexiglass (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 11:45:05 -0700
[Steve Katz] I use a Craftsman Roto-Zip type saw (rotary blade, hand held tool, costs $49.95 with a million accessories), it zips right through plexiglass like butter and can cut a very straight lin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00553.html (16,165 bytes)

189. [Towertalk] SteppIR Performance and misleading advertising (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 12:45:18 -0700
Hi Joe, I'm surely not trying to trash anything or anybody. I was just taking issue with someone's statement, way back in a thread that started last week, that the SteppIR was "optimized for all band
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00669.html (12,015 bytes)

190. [Towertalk] Rebar Cage (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 15:17:02 -0700
It's also possible that an asteroid will strike Earth on the opposite side of the planet, directly 180 degrees opposed to your tower base, and knock your tower and base clear out of the dirt, toward
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00680.html (9,111 bytes)

191. [Towertalk] Need Antenna Advice! (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 07:35:15 -0700
Hi Joe, In the latest QST ad, which I just saw for the first time, the data appears very believable. Their on-line data sheet (last I looked, a week or so ago) states "20 to 50 dB" F/B on all bands,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00729.html (12,047 bytes)

192. [Towertalk] Iis a "free" tower a good deal? (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 14:42:18 -0700
What a well thought-out posting! I don't like BX-series towers at all. They are "rated" by Rohn for antennas having 10' maximum boom length, and I tend to follow that advice -- these non-welded tower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00821.html (14,036 bytes)

193. [Towertalk] Is a "free" tower a good deal? (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:31:34 -0700
For sure, Bill. But the original post discussed a wire, and a step up to a tower and beam of any kind was a quantum leap. Going to stacked beams, especially ones that rotate individually, seems like
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00826.html (8,835 bytes)

194. [Towertalk] rg214 (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 07:41:38 -0700
Craig, RG214 is oversized for standard PL-259's and the 2-piece N's which emulate the back end of a PL-259. The O.D. of the vinyl jacket is > .410", which is about all the standard connectors can acc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00860.html (8,641 bytes)

195. [Towertalk] Changing towers (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 07:49:07 -0700
If you're thinking of the TX-455, which is their smallest 55' tower, the 2.75 yards of concrete would normally be enough, but only with the standard base embedded in a monolithic pour. Drilling for j
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00881.html (9,949 bytes)

196. [Towertalk] Changing towers (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 09:59:08 -0700
Re: K3BU's suggestion... I wouldn't do this, because unless I'm mistaken, I thought the original tower was aluminum, which means the original base legs are also aluminum and likely not up to the task
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00889.html (10,540 bytes)

197. [Towertalk] Mast Coupler? (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 11:30:18 -0700
Jeff, can't you (maybe with a friend also belted on the tower) handle a 16' long aluminum mast? I've done this by myself, strapping on very high on the tower and hand-over-handing the pole up and the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00894.html (8,783 bytes)

198. [Towertalk] Mast Coupler? (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 14:23:31 -0700
This seems beaten to death now, but honestly, who can't support a 16' aluminum 2" mast by holding its lower four feet length, as anybody more than 5'6" tall could do, belted near the top of a tower?
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00901.html (10,256 bytes)

199. [Towertalk] Self Supporting Towers (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 15:57:37 -0700
The HD70, or even its smaller brother the LD70, from Tower Depot would handle this load very easily, self-supported. http://www.towerdepot.com WB2WIK/6 "If everything seems under control, you're just
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00045.html (8,455 bytes)

200. [Towertalk] Tailtwister won't turn. (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 07:31:33 -0700
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00086.html (9,828 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu