Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:stevekz9g@verizon.net: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [TowerTalk] N connectors (score: 1)
Author: "Steven J. Gehring" <stevekz9g@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 02:19:08 -0700
Yep...center pin migration due to extreme temps happens with these connectors. But, the biggest issue I've seen with mil-spec type N's are their incorrect installation (both in the government and civ
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00147.html (12,099 bytes)

2. RE: [TowerTalk] N connectors (score: 1)
Author: "Steven J. Gehring" <stevekz9g@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 01:09:29 -0700
I found a link for what seem to be decent crimped N type connectors with captivated pins. They're made for most of the Times LMR series, as well as the RG-8 variety. You would need the proper crimp t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00175.html (13,843 bytes)

3. RE: Fwd: Re: [TowerTalk] N connectors (score: 1)
Author: "Steven J. Gehring" <stevekz9g@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 18:03:18 -0700
All: Someone mentioned weatherproofing RF connectors, despite their inherent characteristics (N type vs. UHF). This sounds like good advice to me. Personally, I like to use Scotch 70, a self fusing,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00280.html (12,952 bytes)

4. RE: [TowerTalk] Coax Resiliency (score: 1)
Author: "Steven Gehring" <stevekz9g@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 21:21:29 -0700
Hi Michael, You could cut off a couple of feet from each end and still be ok, I believe. You could also check the cable with a megger, a piece of test equipment that measures feed line insulation res
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00441.html (10,057 bytes)

5. RE: [TowerTalk] Coax Resiliency (score: 1)
Author: "Steven Gehring" <stevekz9g@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:28:33 -0700
All: If I'm not mistaken, the megger won't generate more than 500 to 1000 volts with VERY little current. If the coax can't handle this basic leakage test, it's trash. If memory serves me right, the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00460.html (10,682 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Gov't Study to Collect Empirical Data on Towers vs.Birds... (score: 1)
Author: "Steven Gehring" <stevekz9g@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 12:40:09 -0700
The Mobile Radio Technology Bulletin has reported that the FCC has signed an agreement Wednesday with the State of Michigan to gather and collect collect empirical data on towers vs. birds as the Sta
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00485.html (7,676 bytes)

7. RE: [TowerTalk] tiewrapping rebar (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Gehring" <stevekz9g@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 14:06:05 -0700
N2EA is right. Lightning protection shouldn't just rely on the tower base's UFER ground according to NFPA and UL industrial comm. site requirements. In new construction, the rebar cage in the tower's
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00537.html (11,245 bytes)

8. RE: [TowerTalk] Running coax into the basement (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Gehring" <stevekz9g@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 11:46:58 -0700
Hi Dan, You may consider a penetration and pvc that size, but I would include a single point grounding plate mounted in a weatherproof fiberglass Hoffman box. In turn, this box would be mounted over
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00200.html (8,918 bytes)

9. RE: [TowerTalk] 75 meter verticals (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Gehring" <stevekz9g@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 17:02:28 -0700
Check out the Max Gain Systems "Antenna Mart" webpage: http://www.mgs4u.com/catalog/ Specifically, the tower insulator kits for Rohn 25 & 45G sections. http://www.mgs4u.com/catalog/page11.htm They lo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00350.html (8,910 bytes)

10. RE: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25G Harware (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Gehring" <stevekz9g@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 13:39:57 -0700
I thought there were safety issues concerning the use of stainless bolts on towers due to their lowered tensile strength and the possibility of them shearing? Is this true, or a wife's tale? Can an e
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00416.html (9,263 bytes)

11. RE: [TowerTalk] B & W (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Gehring" <stevekz9g@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 16:02:12 -0700
Yep, the B&W antenna in question (a terminated folded dipole) is essentially a dummy load with wires attached. 73. Steven Gehring, KZ9G Bothell, WA E-mail: kz9g@arrl.net So it is broadband over dummy
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00497.html (7,964 bytes)

12. RE: [TowerTalk] B&W Folded Dipoles Recommended? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Gehring" <stevekz9g@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 15:56:09 -0700
Gee, I was generous... I said in a personal email that the efficiency of the B&W terminated folded dipole was typically between 25 and 50%! It seems to be a bit worse than that. They really are "dumm
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00511.html (10,118 bytes)

13. [TowerTalk] Who sells superior 4:1 "current" Baluns? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Gehring" <stevekz9g@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 17:14:21 -0700
All, Can someone please point me to a distributor of quality 4:1 "current" baluns? I'm not looking for the voltage type, but a superior 4 to 1 model that employs two uncoupled cores. I hope such an a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00540.html (7,091 bytes)

14. RE: [TowerTalk] Log Periodics for 40 through 10? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Gehring" <stevekz9g@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 20:29:53 -0700
Hi Pat, The only LPA for amateurs that comes close to covering what you're looking for is the 7-10-30LP8 'SKIP LOG' LPA by M2. Here are it's specs: Model 7-10-30LP8 'SKIP LOG' Frequency range 10 to 3
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00575.html (10,293 bytes)

15. RE: [TowerTalk] intermod filter for 2M (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Gehring" <stevekz9g@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 19:39:00 -0800
Mega dittos on the DCI filter. My DCI-146-4H is a true, cavity type, band pass filter with GREAT rejection above and below the two meter band. I have the full band model and just love it. Besides the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00351.html (9,554 bytes)

16. [TowerTalk] Advise on a 160 Meter Antenna for an South-central Alaskan Acre Lot... (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Gehring" <stevekz9g@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 19:16:47 -0800
Towertalkians, I am soon moving to Wasilla, Alaska, which is about 45 miles outside of Anchorage. The home we're buying is on a one acre lot that is approximately 160 by 300 feet. Given the poor cond
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00146.html (7,654 bytes)

17. RE: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Gehring" <stevekz9g@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 21:02:53 -0800
Despite the opinions expressed here, are Rohn-like products going to live on? Will they be manufactured again? I've missed that on the reflector... 73. Steve, KZ9G Email: kz9g@arrl.net --Original Mes
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00355.html (11,013 bytes)

18. RE: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Gehring" <stevekz9g@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 14:16:16 -0800
Hi Bill, Look at it this way...as a group, we're all getting older and rather crotchety. Sometimes, we all spill comments (from the heart) that would not be spoken out loud. As for Rohn goes, I since
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00381.html (9,528 bytes)

19. [TowerTalk] New Mfgr and Source for Rohn G Series Look-alike Tower Sections... (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Gehring" <stevekz9g@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 16:16:05 -0800
I know someone else mentioned it, but I thought it was worth mentioning again - with a bit more info. AN Wireless is gearing up to make G series sections -- 25G, 45G, 55G, and 65G. See their webpage
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00429.html (7,632 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu