Mail Archive Search: <+from:tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET>

Results:

References: [ +from:tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. Memorial CD Party (score: 1): Author: tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET (tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET); Date: Wed Jan 20 22:58:04 1993; To: Art W6XD cc: cq-contest Neat idea. Hope I can participate using my long expired ORS appointment code. Maybe you should stipulate that only former CD Party participants can enter? Or add an artifi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-01/msg00067.html (6,586 bytes)
2. Contest Duration (score: 1): Author: tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET (tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET); Date: Thu Feb 25 10:51:28 1993; The best 24 hour contest is one that has always been a 24 hour contest. Don't shorten existing ones. If you must provide for part-timers (like me these days), a 24 hour category would be fine. But do; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-02/msg00180.html (7,363 bytes)
3. My last comment on 24 hour contesting (score: 1): Author: tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET (tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET); Date: Tue Mar 2 13:41:44 1993; W9XT and others argue for a flexible start time, 24 hour contiguous category. Although I would love to see a 24 hour category, contiguous is the wrong way to do it. * The primary reason I and many ot; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00031.html (7,506 bytes)
4. Control Placement (score: 1): Author: tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET (tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET); Date: Thu Mar 4 18:24:38 1993; How many of you have suffered for years with the key controls - RIT, AF Gain, IF Shift etc. - on the right hand side of a radio that you place to your left and operate with your left hand? I think al; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00053.html (7,029 bytes)
5. Internet Companion (score: 1): Author: tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET (tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET); Date: Wed Mar 17 08:04:07 1993; The book mentioned by Trey is indeed an excellent intro to Internet. It is concise but entertaining, with just the right level of detail for the Internet novice or casual user who wants to know what; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00222.html (6,550 bytes)
6. No subject (score: 1): Author: tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET (tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET); Date: Fri Mar 19 16:57:33 1993; The first two creative suggestions to come out of this debate since the orignal 24 hour proposal were N6TR's to sponsor a 24 hour listing through NCJ (with volunteer labor) and K1AR's suggestion, rel; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00257.html (8,059 bytes)
7. Sweepstakes Log Checking (score: 1): Author: tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET (tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET); Date: Fri Mar 26 14:41:32 1993; A broken call should cost you the Q. A penalty is inappropriate. Lots of broken calls might be worth a special penalty. /Rick N6XI rick@tss.com; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00315.html (6,962 bytes)
8. CQ Contest Awards (score: 1): Author: tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET (tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET); Date: Mon Apr 26 17:00:06 1993; Heck, why don't we just send certificate images on the Internet and let people print 'em on their own laser printers? After all, we can submit logs that way, at least to ARRL. For that matter, why no; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-04/msg00164.html (6,561 bytes)
9. Improving Contesting (score: 1): Author: tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET (tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET); Date: Tue May 25 09:59:21 1993; Lots of good ideas are floating around about contest equalization (a bad idea), handicapping, ranking, station classification, skill vs. geography, etc. Let's try to define what we want to do: Measur; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00177.html (12,301 bytes)
10. Another Ranking Suggestion (score: 1): Author: tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET (tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET); Date: Wed Jun 9 14:34:01 1993; OK, lots of people agree that a way to rank contesters would be exciting. There are no good ideas on how to make it predictive of future performance like chess and I sense well considered disdain for; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00047.html (8,651 bytes)
11. Another Ranking Suggestion (score: 1): Author: tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET (tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET); Date: Wed Jun 9 15:31:29 1993; Oops - I hit the wrong button and sent an early version of this instead of saving it away for more work later on. Here's the full message. Sorry. ..... OK, lots of people agree that a way to rank con; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00048.html (11,393 bytes)
12. NA Sprint rules change -- what about old records? (score: 1): Author: tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET (tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET); Date: Sat Jul 10 11:46:06 1993; Well, I bet Jeff breaks his old record, despite the rule change! /Rick Tavan N6XI rick@tss.com; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-07/msg00051.html (6,885 bytes)
13. robots (score: 1): Author: tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET (tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET); Date: Mon Aug 2 09:23:23 1993; This thread of conversation reminds me of the controversy perking in the chess community over participation of computers in (otherwise) human tournaments. Everyone wants to know how strong the comput; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-08/msg00014.html (6,841 bytes)
14. We Robots (score: 1): Author: tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET (tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET); Date: Mon Aug 2 09:48:48 1993; Excellent posting by John, K2MM. Made me regret my own premature comments. I promise to read at least a full day's mail before replying in the future.... It would be unfortunate if contest bandwidth; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-08/msg00015.html (7,893 bytes)
15. CW Sprint (score: 1): Author: tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET (tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET); Date: Tue Sep 8 10:32:28 1992; N6XI 237 QSOs, 48 Mults = 11,376 Activity seemed way down. First time in 2 years I failed to break 250 with my little pistol station. Why Labor Day Weekend? 73, /Rick; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-09/msg00011.html (6,228 bytes)
16. Equalized ? (score: 1): Author: tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET (tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET); Date: Fri Oct 30 10:50:17 1992; I have to agree with Bob that equalizing a contest to fairly compare operating ability really requires geographic proximity and equipment equality. Just to add one more argument against an equalized; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-10/msg00084.html (8,378 bytes)
17. K1AR Address & Thanks (score: 1): Author: tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET (tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET); Date: Tue Nov 10 10:55:56 1992; Does anyone have an Internet address for K1AR? I want to thank him for straightening out the CQWW trophy backlog situation. So if you're listening, John, thanks for the plaque. It's even more appreci; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00070.html (6,227 bytes)
18. PVRC New Officers (score: 1): Author: tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET (tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET); Date: Tue Nov 10 09:13:24 1992; I was in PVRC in the mid-60s and occasionally get into the reunion. 73, /Rick Tavan N6XI (formerly K3QDD) Internet: tavan@tss.com; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00071.html (6,397 bytes)
19. QRP S-W-E-E-P-stakes (score: 1): Author: tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET (tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET); Date: Tue Nov 10 10:42:03 1992; repl: bad addresses: derek.@TGV.COM, craigr@cod.nosc.mil -- no sub-domain in domain-part of address (@) Jim, you probably should have named the lid who refused to work Q stations. Your fine score is; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00072.html (7,455 bytes)
20. Call signs (score: 1): Author: tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET (tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET); Date: Fri Nov 13 09:09:43 1992; I fail to comprehend why FCC can't let someone else (like ARRL) administer choose-your-callsign. The VE program has been a smashing success, so it is clear that the government can run a volunteer ope; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00098.html (6,362 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]