Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:tgstewart@pepco.com: 56 ]

Total 56 documents matching your query.

21. [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10M rule violations (score: 1)
Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com)
Date: Wed Dec 15 14:10:15 1999
I just want to mention a couple of clear rule violations that were occuring this weekend: A) The rules state that 28300 to 28350 is a "no-contest" area, yet the segment was loaded with DX stations ca
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-12/msg00138.html (7,282 bytes)

22. [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10M rule violations (score: 1)
Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com)
Date: Wed Dec 15 15:32:34 1999
Here are the violated rules directly from the ARRL web site: 6.3 All entrants may transmit only one signal on the air at any given time. 6.4 The frequencies from 28.3 through 28.35 MHz are designated
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-12/msg00145.html (8,279 bytes)

23. [CQ-Contest] 160m in SS? (score: 1)
Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com)
Date: Thu Jan 15 07:23:30 1998
I think you answered your own question! No mults = no activity = no 160 and little 10 for now. 73, Ty K3MM -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-01/msg00311.html (6,434 bytes)

24. [CQ-Contest] EAST vs. WEST in ARRL Sweepstakes (score: 1)
Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com)
Date: Mon Feb 2 07:26:55 1998
I dont think it's any big secret about 40 being open til about noon on the east coast. The problem is that we are still working Texas no matter what band we're on! All east coasters should refuse to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00008.html (10,921 bytes)

25. [CQ-Contest] IARU Results (score: 1)
Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com)
Date: Fri Feb 13 09:47:20 1998
Unfortunately, I think this is just the tip of the iceberg. Besides CQWW, there is little log checking that is done and even then it is haphazard at best. CQWW has a great bunch of guys that are dedi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00103.html (8,148 bytes)

26. [CQ-Contest] Power Line Interference (score: 1)
Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com)
Date: Tue Mar 24 12:50:21 1998
It's highly unlikely that the tree limbs were the actual cause of the interference. It's more likely they were causing movement in some other loose hardware on a nearby pole. One thing to keep in min
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-03/msg00433.html (10,008 bytes)

27. [CQ-Contest] CQ-WPX..A Modest Proposal (score: 1)
Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com)
Date: Thu Apr 2 12:56:18 1998
Shortening the contest wont change the results at all....just lower the scores overall. I would suggest that anyone who's tired of "losing" from anywere outside of 1,2, or 3 land by a plane ticket an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00021.html (10,862 bytes)

28. [CQ-Contest] CQ-WPX.scoring etc. (score: 1)
Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com)
Date: Mon Apr 6 14:24:09 1998
The only advantage of being further west and south is better propagation into the Far East and better trans-equatorial propagation. It's fairly rare when the JA, etc., activity is good enough to even
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00104.html (12,203 bytes)

29. [CQ-Contest] The Great WPX Debate (score: 1)
Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com)
Date: Tue Apr 14 14:50:05 1998
*How about the JARL contests or Asia sprints or VK/ZL contests? *I'd like the chance to compete for a free round trip to JA from the East Coast! *I think we should have double points for 80 meters du
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00210.html (7,884 bytes)

30. [CQ-Contest] The Great WPX Debate & this reflector. (score: 1)
Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com)
Date: Wed Apr 15 09:43:54 1998
Well, I thought I gave my suggestions a long time ago. As far as the time period goes, I really dont care that much. It's just another facet of the contest, whichever way it goes...I just dont like a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00231.html (7,330 bytes)

31. [CQ-Contest] The Great WPX Debate (score: 1)
Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com)
Date: Wed Apr 15 10:07:18 1998
I would suggest that the reason full-time activity is poor is that it is too late in the season. There are only a handful of us nutty enough spend a beautiful weekend indoors instead of out doing ant
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00233.html (8,759 bytes)

32. [CQ-Contest] Contest Ethics - A Case Study? (score: 1)
Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com)
Date: Fri May 22 08:54:03 1998
None of this proves anything. You can be logged in, having the cluster send you spots, and not display them on your screen by selecting the appropriate class in CT or NA (TR?). The bottom line is tha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-05/msg00221.html (10,010 bytes)

33. Computer Noise Poll (score: 1)
Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com)
Date: Tue Jan 14 10:42:28 1997
I recently assembled a new computer from parts, using an IBM P150+ (Pentium clone) processor and discoverd to my horror that it is generating huge amounts of RF in the ham bands, particularly on 160
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-01/msg00026.html (6,895 bytes)

34. Computer Noise Poll (score: 1)
Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com)
Date: Tue Jan 14 10:46:26 1997
I recently assembled a new computer from parts, using an IBM P150+ (Pentium clone) processor and discoverd to my horror that it is generating huge amounts of RF in the ham bands, particularly on 160
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-01/msg00027.html (21,907 bytes)

35. [CQ-Contest] 3*8 hour contests - NO! (score: 1)
Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com)
Date: Thu Apr 3 09:15:42 1997
There are few contests that use this format and they are all small and will remain small. The only contest that comes to mind that currently uses this format is the SARTG and it's, can I politely say
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-04/msg00035.html (7,991 bytes)

36. [CQ-Contest] "Ken Wolff" : Re: Humor - software (score: 1)
Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com)
Date: Wed Apr 9 08:30:16 1997
That's great, except the last rev number should be 9.27! 73, Tyler K3MM I forward the following exchange to the CT reflector without further comment. Fred Hopengarten, K1VR Six Willarch Road; Lincoln
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-04/msg00112.html (8,207 bytes)

37. [CQ-Contest] CUT NUMBERS - CUT CALL! (score: 1)
Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com)
Date: Wed May 28 17:15:46 1997
I'm with you, Larry. I think there is a time and place for using the alpha-bits...and that is when signals are generally loud and/or when you are running and/or running high power. Actually with the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-05/msg00268.html (9,308 bytes)

38. [CQ-Contest] Re: [TowerTalk] yagi comments (score: 1)
Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com)
Date: Mon Jun 16 16:19:32 1997
This is all very interesting...but what we really need is an independent third-party analysis of what happens to both of these philosophies when loaded with 1/2" radial ice and a little wind comes al
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-06/msg00181.html (13,152 bytes)

39. [CQ-Contest] DXBase 97 -- Getting Even Better! (score: 1)
Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com)
Date: Mon Jun 23 11:02:24 1997
Maybe I'm the only one, but while I really liked DOS DXbase as a product, I've been unhappy with the support. I shelled out what I consider above average bucks at Dayton for version 4.5 (2 years ago?
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-06/msg00245.html (8,148 bytes)

40. [CQ-Contest] DXBase 97 -- Getting Even Better!...or worse? (score: 1)
Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com)
Date: Tue Jun 24 18:18:53 1997
Well, DXBase already has some of the most inconvenient, restrictive copy protection around, so I aint buyin' that argument. I'm sure they would have wanted $15 or $25 to issue a new 4.5 registered to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-06/msg00261.html (10,245 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu