Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:tim.n9puz@gmail.com: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Dipole Ends (score: 1)
Author: Tim N9PUZ <tim.n9puz@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:58:44 -0500
I'm going to hang the center of a dipole from my tower. The question is really about attaching the two ends of the support ropes running through a pulley and down to provide for some movement in the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00611.html (7,656 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] dipole ends: Tree attachments (score: 1)
Author: Tim N9PUZ <tim.n9puz@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:25:44 -0500
I knew at some point a suggestion would be made to replace the trees. I'm surprised it wasn't the first suggestion! Guys, thanks for the info so far regarding pulleys, bungees, etc. My main question
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00638.html (8,328 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Dipole Ends (score: 1)
Author: Tim N9PUZ <tim.n9puz@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:47:33 -0500
I won't have that sort of expense here. The antenna will be more of an inverted V because the existing trees on the property are not as tall as yours from the sound of it. An extension ladder will ea
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00654.html (8,918 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] 25G/House bracket (score: 1)
Author: Tim N9PUZ <tim.n9puz@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 15:33:07 -0500
Art, I don't have specific experience with what you're doing but here is info I have from an older Rohn Consumer Products guide. Drawing #A871302 in my Rohn book has a chart for 25G Bracketed Tower.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00045.html (8,674 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] (no subject) Vertical Antenna Instead of Tower Decision.... (score: 1)
Author: Tim N9PUZ <tim.n9puz@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 08:39:09 -0500
I had much the same question. From the diagram you already know where you want the tower. What type are you considering? Is there a big lead time on delivery? If you choose something like Rohn 25 or
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00271.html (9,106 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn Tap in Base? (score: 1)
Author: Tim N9PUZ <tim.n9puz@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:27:57 -0500
I don't know the part numbers but it is called a "drive in base." There is one with a plate and a single rod in the center and another with a plate and three rods. I imagine anywhere you can buy Rohn
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00332.html (7,281 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Why are gin poles so expensive? (score: 1)
Author: Tim N9PUZ <tim.n9puz@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 07:56:24 -0500
I do not know for sure but I expect that it's a combination of it being a much lower volume product that say tower sections and a whole bunch of product liability. Tim, N9PUZ ________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00025.html (7,736 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding with Polyphaser lightning arrestors (score: 1)
Author: Tim N9PUZ <tim.n9puz@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 08:04:38 -0500
I was reading this the other day. It apparently works in his situation. What keeps anything connected to the center conductor of the coax runs protected? Separate question... I've seen several places
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00137.html (8,761 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical with no radial wires (score: 1)
Author: Tim N9PUZ <tim.n9puz@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:09:17 -0500
I've had a GAP Titan DX for a few years and it works pretty well. It does not cover the entire 75/80 meter band. When you build it you have to choose a small segment of about 50 kHz. No radials neede
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00380.html (8,034 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Connector Assembly (score: 1)
Author: Tim N9PUZ <tim.n9puz@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:02:52 -0500
Neat tool. I can't see myself using the assembly tool but the companion cable stripper would be handy if you were building a bunch of cables. I have a new tower with 3 runs of 9913F7. Between those c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00448.html (7,886 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Amphenol PL259 (score: 1)
Author: Tim N9PUZ <tim.n9puz@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:26:34 -0500
I had to smile as I read this. I'm sure it's true but we hams would sure live up to our reputation for being cheap by purchasing Bury-Flex and then saving a dollar by not using a couple of brand name
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00594.html (9,695 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Outdoor Coax Issue (score: 1)
Author: Tim N9PUZ <tim.n9puz@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2008 10:09:33 -0600
If I remember correctly your vertical may end up being a temporary antenna until a tower can be installed next year, correct? For what it's worth about 6 years ago I put up a Gap Titan DX in the back
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00026.html (9,578 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical on a tower (score: 1)
Author: Tim N9PUZ <tim.n9puz@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 10:47:49 -0600
Hard to believe anyone would drink beer at Field Day. ;-) Tim, N9PUZ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00579.html (7,530 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Was "43ft Vertical Feeding Question and Balun Type" (score: 1)
Author: Tim N9PUZ <tim.n9puz@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:55:57 -0600
I don't believe the MFJ-998 is remote thus it doesn't eliminate the problems with high SWR on the feedline between antenna and tuner. Tim, N9PUZ _______________________________________________ ______
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00589.html (10,273 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Was "43ft Vertical Feeding (score: 1)
Author: Tim N9PUZ <tim.n9puz@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:40:33 -0600
It bodes well for working in the ice and snow that they are located in Nebraska too. Tim, N9PUZ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00710.html (10,549 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] New 259B Analyzer.... need Elmer(s) (score: 1)
Author: Tim N9PUZ <tim.n9puz@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:08:24 -0500
For items like the antenna analyzer that may be used infrequently I prefer NiCd batteries over NiMh. They typically have a lower self-discharge rate. Some older vintage MFJ-259B units did not have a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00439.html (8,042 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] Ladderline - what are the facts??/ (score: 1)
Author: Tim N9PUZ <tim.n9puz@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:01:13 -0500
In the case of the Cobra antennas the ladder line section is important to the operation of the antenna itself. They recommend if it is too long or difficult to route that you coil it outside and off
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00623.html (9,430 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] Compacted vs. Undisturbed Soil (score: 1)
Author: Tim N9PUZ <tim.n9puz@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:52:50 -0500
That sounds like something I'd want the PE who put his name on plan to answer. Tim, N9PUZ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mai
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00769.html (7,093 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] Wood constructed tower (score: 1)
Author: Tim N9PUZ <tim.n9puz@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:05:20 -0500
There is a local ham here that had a pole installed to support the far end of his wire antenna. He said he bought it from a local electrical contractor who drilled it for the pulley, etc., dug the ho
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00835.html (8,281 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] Assembly Manual for a Mosley Pro-77-A (score: 1)
Author: Tim N9PUZ <tim.n9puz@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 08:48:13 -0500
I got a quick response on a TA-33 Jr manual from Mosley in St. Louis. The lady emailed me a scanned copy the same day I talked to them. Tim, N9PUZ _______________________________________________ ____
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00377.html (7,380 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu