Mail Archive Search: <+from:tmitche4@visteon.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:tmitche4@visteon.com: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] In search of NAQP Team (score: 1): Author: tmitche4@visteon.com (Mitchell, Tim T.K.); Date: Tue Jan 4 09:50:16 2000; Anyone need another member for NAQP CW and/or NAQP SSB team ? 73 Tim K9TM tmitche4@visteon.com tim.k9tm@totalink.net -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative reques; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-01/msg00008.html (6,294 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] NAQP SSB Team ? (score: 1): Author: tmitche4@visteon.com (Mitchell, Tim T.K.); Date: Tue Jan 11 14:46:03 2000; Anyone looking for people for their team ? I am available. 73 Tim K9TM tim.k9tm@totalink.net tmitche4@visteon.com -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests:; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-01/msg00022.html (6,295 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] New SS Category Proposal (score: 1): Author: tmitche4@visteon.com (Mitchell, Tim T.K.); Date: Wed Mar 15 10:13:36 2000; Oh boy, I have stayed out of this until this comment was made. Now I can't resist anymore. The absolute worst thing that could ever happen to SS is to change it to Q's and/or mults once per band! Thi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00209.html (12,709 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] "LAST 2" - Personal Experiences (score: 1): Author: tmitche4@visteon.com (Mitchell, Tim T.K.); Date: Tue Mar 28 10:00:50 2000; The sample case given went as it should, in my opinion. Here's why... You really only want the guy to give his call. If he gives the exchange, you are now stuck with an extra xmit anyway. I am assumi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00285.html (9,319 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] "LAST 2" - Personal Experiences (score: 1): Author: tmitche4@visteon.com (Mitchell, Tim T.K.); Date: Tue Mar 28 13:44:58 2000; Most important point first... Sorry I should have said this for the last line: KE9NA: IB0JTF qsl qrz ke9na I agree that it is very important to send the correct/edited/whatever callsign. My oversight; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00288.html (9,705 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] SO2R (score: 1): Author: tmitche4@visteon.com (Mitchell, Tim T.K.); Date: Fri Jun 2 09:55:25 2000; There is so much I would like to say on this topic but I will attempt to limit it so that the main points come across... - I don't believe in more watered down categories. IMHO we already have too ma; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00059.html (14,307 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] SO2R a new category? (score: 1): Author: tmitche4@visteon.com (Mitchell, Tim T.K.); Date: Fri Jun 2 12:49:01 2000; you're 2R. So in other words, if I listen on my sub-rcv and main rcv... I am 2R? It is still only 1R (physically). I can't listen while in xmit like a 'true' 2R but by this definition it is still a 2; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00069.html (9,161 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] SO2 Computer (score: 1): Author: tmitche4@visteon.com (Mitchell, Tim T.K.); Date: Thu Jun 22 13:14:38 2000; Over the years I have experimented with several ways of doing this as well. The only thing that using 2 computers made easier was the ability to screw-up and break the rules (xmit on 2 radios at the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00216.html (8,464 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] NAQP CW & RTTY Roundup (score: 1): Author: tmitche4@visteon.com (Mitchell, Tim T.K.); Date: Wed Dec 22 15:24:46 1999; When the latest NCJ came out I noticed that NAQP CW and ARRL RTTY Roundup are on the same weekend this year. I notified both sponsors and both did not seem to see any problem. The problem for me then; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-12/msg00228.html (7,479 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]