Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:tod@k0to.us: 169 ]

Total 169 documents matching your query.

141. [TowerTalk] Fabricated common mode chokes and their impedances (score: 1)
Author: "Tod" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:51:14 -0600
This probably has a limited audience but I do know that there are some readers on this list interested in fabrication of high impedance common mode chokes for their stations. I built and measured 18
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00399.html (7,943 bytes)

142. Re: [TowerTalk] Fabricated common mode chokes and their impedances (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 08:01:08 -0600
How high is the SWR on your feed line Roger? If I was using a feed line that had 3:1 or higher I expect I would want to use something other than RG58, RG59 or RG8X. Davis BuryFlex certainly will do t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00412.html (10,352 bytes)

143. Re: [TowerTalk] Fabricated common mode chokes and their impedances (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 08:13:39 -0600
What version are you using Larry. I do not have a problem here downloading it with a Mac or with a PC. The file size is 4.4 MB so that might be a problem for some people. Also, if you are using a ver
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00413.html (10,281 bytes)

144. Re: [TowerTalk] Testing chokes with 31 material (score: 1)
Author: "Tod" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:59:16 -0600
Hi Ron: as you have described. I have the AIM 4170C from W5BIG, but it is not a VNA. I think the VNA instrument is an AIM 2180 and the AIM 4170 is an antenna Analyzer. I tried using the AIM 4170 to m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00447.html (11,646 bytes)

145. Re: [TowerTalk] Testing chokes with 31 material (score: 1)
Author: "Tod" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:02:02 -0600
RonL A follow up to my earlier response with respect to measuring the chokes using an AMI 4170. This afternoon I measured two chokes with the AIM 4170 and ploted the results on the two cores, 4 turns
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00467.html (8,998 bytes)

146. Re: [TowerTalk] coaxial jumpers (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - Idaho" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:50:18 -0700
RG400U works very well for in the shack jumpers. [As long as you are only running the legal limit power]. Double silver shielding, Teflon dielectric, etc. Easiest to use crimp connectors rather than
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-11/msg00344.html (7,939 bytes)

147. Re: [TowerTalk] SWR Problem Balun or lightning protection? (score: 1)
Author: Tod - ID <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 08:50:00 -0700
This is an interesting thread which has gotten difficult to follow. Let me see if I understand it correctly. 1. When you transmit at high power either with a continuous carrier [ RTTY] or with a high
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00506.html (11,243 bytes)

148. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter antenna - Radials (score: 1)
Author: Tod Olson <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 08:33:58 -0600
For those who can get a copy of QEX to read, check out the very extensive writeup on radials in the recent edition. Much better to read through that several times than to try to understand things by
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00208.html (9,196 bytes)

149. Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation (score: 1)
Author: Tod Olson <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 12:02:06 -0600
Once again, experiment trumps theory! There is a lot of room in the ham world for polite skeptics who take the time to run experiments, make measurements and then share the results. Tod, K0TO _______
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00359.html (9,773 bytes)

150. [TowerTalk] Theory and Experiment (score: 1)
Author: Tod Olson <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 07:52:29 -0600
Dave is quite correct in what he wrote. There are poor theories and poor experiments and lots of folks who are confused by both. My comments were intended to follow on after the email by Jim, VE7RF,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00383.html (10,721 bytes)

151. Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation (score: 1)
Author: Tod Olson <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:26:02 -0600
Jim: I read with some interest the following section from one of your emails on this subject. I read that you are saying it is possible to have 1:1 SWR on the feed line and simultaneously have signif
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00384.html (10,926 bytes)

152. Re: [TowerTalk] CM current and SWR meter changes (score: 1)
Author: Tod Olson <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:14:28 -0600
Whoops. Net impedance at the 'feed point'? ? Of the antenna, of the feed line at the station? I am not sure I understand the use of the term "net impedance' Steve. Mentally I am picturing two impedan
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00397.html (11,897 bytes)

153. Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation (score: 1)
Author: Tod Olson <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:20:38 -0600
I had just posted a comment when I received you email Ian. I think you have summed things up pretty effectively. The discussion has proceeded without the benefit of a set of equations that would have
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00398.html (12,359 bytes)

154. Re: [TowerTalk] The Antenna System (score: 1)
Author: Tod Olson <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 20:47:24 -0600
Ward Silver, N0AX, said: -- "Also, it would greatly facilitate the discussion were we to be able to include drawings - I noticed several misunderstandings that would not have occured if the text was
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00425.html (10,558 bytes)

155. Re: [TowerTalk] Posting figures (score: 1)
Author: Tod Olson <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 10:30:15 -0600
Hi Wilson. I little bit of timing error on this end. I sent out the email and was 'called off the job by SWMBO and forgot to create the TowerTalk directory at http://www.k0to.us/HAM/File_Share/TowerT
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00451.html (7,874 bytes)

156. Re: [TowerTalk] Baluns for RX antennas (score: 1)
Author: Tod Olson <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 08:32:54 -0600
Craig: What measurement equipment and set up did you use to determine the Z of the chokes that you built? Do you have any pictures of the measurement setup? Do you have any graphs or data beyond the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00471.html (10,786 bytes)

157. Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation (score: 1)
Author: Tod Olson <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:28:28 -0600
Steve, Jim, Ian: The exchanges have been interesting and useful. Now, it would be great if we had some equations [and diagrams] that laid out how it fits together. Once that is done people can be ref
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00510.html (9,894 bytes)

158. Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation (score: 1)
Author: Tod Olson <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:32:47 -0600
Dave: One my most memorable Professors in undergraduate school taught us early on that, "ALWAYS AND NEVER ARE TWO WORDS YOU MUST ALWAYS NEVER USE ! " A generally applicable rule. I like your other ru
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00511.html (10,972 bytes)

159. Re: [TowerTalk] Tick thread (score: 1)
Author: Tod Olson <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:01:26 -0600
Are you thinking of Rickettsia or Rocky Mountain Fever? _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00577.html (8,800 bytes)

160. Re: [TowerTalk] Help With First Tower (score: 1)
Author: Tod Olson <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 19:36:37 -0600
I went back and read the original e-mail. It said 130 mph maximum gust. I am pretty sure that meeting the most recent spec for the area in Idaho that I placed the the tower the maximum wind gust spec
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-05/msg00093.html (9,257 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu