Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:tonno.vahk@gmail.com: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Asking to borrow FT-5000 for WRTC (score: 1)
Author: "Tonno Vahk" <tonno.vahk@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 00:20:30 +0300
Hi all, I would like to ask if any kind FT-5000 owner anywhere within a reasonable distance from Boston (or coming there by car perhaps) would be willing to help us (me and ES2RR) out and lend us a r
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-04/msg00178.html (8,569 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Crimea, Taiwan and CQWW (score: 1)
Author: "Tonno Vahk" <tonno.vahk@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 21:52:08 +0300
The cases are not exactly comparable I guess. It is obvious that CQWW needs to make a decision in all those problematic cases. It is also obvious that the rules and principles are clear about pirate
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00162.html (14,095 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Need clarification from DL1MGB (score: 1)
Author: "Tonno Vahk" <tonno.vahk@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:37:01 +0200
Hi, Is this a joke? It can't be true in reality that the organizers meant to have assisted and non-assisted in the same qualification category and the scores compared to each other! So far I thought
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00309.html (13,202 bytes)

24. [CQ-Contest] Tower crash (score: 1)
Author: "Tonno Vahk" <tonno.vahk@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 15:54:19 +0300
Hi, To avoid the rumors about my 15m H Frame having crashed I posted pics to my QRZ page on the 45m tower that crashed just after WPX in a storm. It carried Optibeam monoband stacks and 3 elements on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-04/msg00062.html (6,676 bytes)

25. [CQ-Contest] CR3L (score: 1)
Author: "Tonno Vahk" <tonno.vahk@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 14:03:31 +0200
There we are. Another witch hunt launched and people calling someone cheater or unethical for no reason whatsoever. There is absolutely nothing unethical about doing a contest and then deciding based
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00194.html (8,121 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] CR3L Category Switch and PJ2T (score: 1)
Author: "Tonno Vahk" <tonno.vahk@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 14:27:28 +0200
The funny thing here is that even if CR3L had stayed in MM it would be way premature to hang gold medals on PJ2T guys:) Nobody seems to notice that W3LPL is just 0.6% away by the raw scores and judgi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00290.html (11,272 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] K9YC, WRTC, deep pockets (score: 1)
Author: "Tonno Vahk" <tonno.vahk@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 21:23:32 +0300
What Ranko proposed was that the potential qualifiers will commit to letting anybody into their station for inspection at any time during any qualifying contest (ideally this should still be agreed a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-08/msg00149.html (8,661 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] R: WAE PHONE CONTEST FREQ, To be or not to be? (score: 1)
Author: "Tonno Vahk" <tonno.vahk@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 11:27:43 +0300
Well, discussion is surely not useless if there is a rule that creates confusion and that the organizers have not been enforcing. We would surely welcome a clear statement by the organizers that as a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-09/msg00038.html (20,066 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting in 10 Years - SUMMARY!! (score: 1)
Author: "Tonno Vahk" <tonno.vahk@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 19:01:52 +0200
Well, 10 years has passed, it is February 2017 and I have to fulfil my promise of bringing those survey results up here again! You can see the post from February 2007 below summarizing opinions colle
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-02/msg00037.html (15,065 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] Russian Beats Out Canada for Magnetic North ... For Now (score: 1)
Author: Tonno Vahk <tonno.vahk@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 22:17:19 +0300
for me at KO38CS the declination is 9.43 degrees now and I have used 10 degrees for a while. Though 20 years ago the declination was 6.57 degrees and 10 years ago 7.75 degrees. So it is climbing:) 10
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-05/msg00016.html (8,527 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Question about category (score: 1)
Author: Tonno Vahk <tonno.vahk@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2020 11:47:54 +0300
Yes, of course you are single op unassisted. Firstly it is 100% clear that using a human antenna switch does not put you in Assisted category as you are not using any QSO Finding Assistance as clearl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00031.html (12,161 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] Question about category (score: 1)
Author: Tonno Vahk <tonno.vahk@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 10:36:54 +0300
Thanks for pointing that out Dave! I have not entered ARRL contests seriously for a while and had not noticed that. Of course that proves even more clearly that Operating does not include technical o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00039.html (11,756 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] Released Rules for CQ WW WPX SSB / CW (score: 1)
Author: Tonno Vahk <tonno.vahk@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 11:03:40 +0200
hi, just one remark - comparison of the number of entries in SO unassisted categories in CQWW or CQWPX is somewhat misleading because very big number of casual entrants just enter SO Unassisted categ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00138.html (11,124 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU Radiosport LY0HQ (score: 1)
Author: Tonno Vahk <tonno.vahk@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2022 23:36:29 +0300
Hi, the same way will Estonian HQ station ES9A/ES9HQ not take part showing support to our friends in Ukraine. 73 ES5TV ERAU HF Manager Lithuanian Amateur Radio Society and LY0HQ team also has decided
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-07/msg00056.html (7,883 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Scoring Question (score: 1)
Author: Tonno Vahk <tonno.vahk@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 11:09:56 +0300
Hi, Introduction of those score comparison areas within a single qualification area is a horrible idea. They did the same in EU1 (splitting Baltics and Scandinavia) and pretty much destroyed motivati
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-10/msg00085.html (17,480 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Scoring Question (score: 1)
Author: Tonno Vahk <tonno.vahk@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 18:32:20 +0300
Yes, that is how it is. Every now and then people want to give a chance to stations not on seaside or hilltop or otherwise not being competitive. That is a dead end. If the geography justifies creati
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-10/msg00091.html (12,573 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu