Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:tree@kkn.net: 446 ]

Total 446 documents matching your query.

181. [CQ-Contest] Cut number for "3" (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 17:00:57 -0800
I hadn't ever heard this before, but I did some research on the web and found this page that lists cut numbers for morse code numbers: http://www.ac6v.com/morseaids.htm#AB According to this - the cut
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00057.html (6,849 bytes)

182. [CQ-Contest] Random acts of kindness (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 07:25:26 -0800
I must disagree with the senior senator from Texas on this point. I am not sure the line is that black and white. I wish it were. Comparing the random acts of kindness of 30 years ago to the ones of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00115.html (8,379 bytes)

183. [CQ-Contest] Another angle on assisted versus "being helped" (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 10:47:12 -0800
Back "in the good old days" of contesting, if you were not lucky enough to have a VE8 or VE1 call you, you had to decide if you wanted to stop CQing and go into S&P mode to find one. Knowing when and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00140.html (7,964 bytes)

184. Re: [CQ-Contest] Another angle on assisted versus "being helped", (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 13:35:12 -0800
VE4XT asks: This really helps paint a clear picture on why exchanging this type of information is best not done at all (if you are unassisted). In the case you outline - since I found the station wit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00143.html (7,664 bytes)

185. Re: [CQ-Contest] Random acts of kindness, Unassisted Categories,Rules, etc. (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 17:53:29 -0800
This is an interesting question. About 20 years ago, I produced the "Z80 Op" that could make QSOs on its own. Is that an operator? One thing is for sure - as technology improves, the "art of contesti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00157.html (9,537 bytes)

186. [CQ-Contest] Stew Perry Distance Challenge and spotting (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 10:57:35 -0800
Bill - W6WRT observes: That obviously wouldn't inclue a two meter spotting net - or some kind of frequency that converts "packet" spots to audio for the blind. BTW - The Stew Perry contest rules ment
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00239.html (7,374 bytes)

187. [CQ-Contest] I can see the difference... (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:54:40 -0800
This feels more like a very technical argument - which focus's on the definition of the words - rather than what the end result is. Either one of the can generate a response from a helpful person, w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00292.html (10,141 bytes)

188. [CQ-Contest] Humour,straight keys - and bands you aren't set up for... (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:02:27 -0800
I always enjoy tying two threads together, but I think I can do better this time. I had stopped reading the cq-contest threads, but I tuned into a conversation on 75 meters and someone mentioned ther
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00381.html (8,625 bytes)

189. [CQ-Contest] SS off time calculations (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:36:39 -0800
All - I had meant to get around to publishing something in the NCJ about this, but just never get around to it... And apologies to W2EV for this being posted in an informal place. For anyone who does
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00383.html (11,670 bytes)

190. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS off time calculations (Attn: Possible StupidQuestion!) (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 09:27:31 -0800
Hmmm - guess this is something that always was there when I started contesting about 40 years ago. There are easy answers - being able to be competitive without totally destroying yourself for return
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00424.html (9,514 bytes)

191. [CQ-Contest] Simple on-time / off-time calculations (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:26:19 -0800
Yes - you can do it that way. I think this example might help... We will ignore that an off-time has to be at least 30 minutes for this. If you have the following two QSOs - you have NO off time: QSO
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00436.html (7,569 bytes)

192. [CQ-Contest] 28 minute breaks (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:35:15 -0800
That is correct. The only exception being if the break was taken at the start or the end of the contest - where the 30 minute minimum requirement is not enforced. Tree _______________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00437.html (7,182 bytes)

193. [CQ-Contest] Incorrect conclusions about un-assisted versus assisted (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 14:45:25 -0800
When I see this comment - I just have to jump up and down and make as much noise as I can - as it is the totally wrong conclusion to jump to. The reason that you see typically lower un-assisted score
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00467.html (8,132 bytes)

194. Re: [CQ-Contest] Optical and galvanic isolation (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 14:53:06 -0800
I have seen some problem associated with ground loops go away when properly using transformers for isolation. I think this is most important on transmit audio than on the headphone side - but if you
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00468.html (8,948 bytes)

195. Re: [CQ-Contest] Incorrect conclusions about un-assisted versusassisted (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:10:59 -0800
I think the difference between SO2R and packet is that the majority of people think that SO2R technology still leaves just the single operator in the equation. Is it an advantage - yes - but it isn'
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00482.html (9,897 bytes)

196. [CQ-Contest] Top-ops adapting to new technology (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:42:44 -0800
I totally agree the top ops could adapt to using packet if they were forced to. The point I think is being missed is that the top ops do not want to use packet. They do not want someone helping them
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00484.html (7,566 bytes)

197. [CQ-Contest] Single-op assisted versus unassisted (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:48:15 -0800
Perhaps I typed un when I shouldn't have. I was never trying to say that assisted scores are higher than unassisted. I was trying to explain why that was the case. You are right - I mistyped. This s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00485.html (7,667 bytes)

198. [CQ-Contest] What happens when you spot (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 09:46:08 -0800
I think your three answers pretty much cover it - except for one that I am surprised didn't make it: 4. To increase the # of stations the DX station can work. Recently, I have started seeing people w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00499.html (9,645 bytes)

199. [CQ-Contest] QSX frequency (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 08:10:33 -0800
I think the suggestion already made to just say "UP" takes care of this issue without creating the problem I was describing. Agree? Tree _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest ma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00578.html (7,236 bytes)

200. [CQ-Contest] Caught using assistance (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 10:10:38 -0800
Interesting case of getting caught using "assistance": "Chess Player Banned 10 Years For Cheating With Bluetooth, Computer" http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=196702108 H
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00651.html (6,517 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu