Mail Archive Search: <+from:tree@kkn.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:tree@kkn.net: 675 ]

Total 675 documents matching your query.

101. [TRLog] Re: OS compatibility (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR); Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 08:33:51 -0800; No plans for Linux or Windows versions anytime soon. Tree -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com P; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-12/msg00119.html (7,600 bytes)
102. [TRLog] Re: OS compatibility (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR); Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 08:32:29 -0800; It is true that some motherboards are "legacy free". I have seen designs that omit the parallel port. Perhaps the day is coming where there will be no serial ports (other than USB) and no parallel p; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-12/msg00134.html (9,175 bytes)
103. [TRLog] contesting.com server update (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR); Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 12:46:36 -0800; This message is from W4AN - who sponsors the contesting.com website and mail lists. I think you will all agree that having this service available is a BIG plus - not just for the trlog reflector, but; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-12/msg00142.html (8,361 bytes)
104. [TRLog] Donations (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR); Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 08:38:50 -0800; approved: wa6tut Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 11:20:15 -0500 (EST) From: "Bill Fisher, W4AN" <w4an@CONTESTING.COM> X-Sender: w4an@fresno.akorn.net To: all-lists@CONTESTING.COM Subject: Contesting.com Serve; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-12/msg00151.html (7,330 bytes)
105. [TRLog] Re: TRLog V6.61 (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Larry Tree Tyree N6TR); Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 11:47:28 -0800; Interesting - I will check into this tonight. Tree -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems:; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-12/msg00172.html (7,251 bytes)
106. [TRLog] Re: TRLog V6.61 (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR); Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 12:00:31 -0800; Yup. It appears that some of the last few changes (including the update to the version number) might not have made it into the program I released. Once I figure out the Icom issue already reported,; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-12/msg00173.html (7,050 bytes)
107. [TRLog] Problems with IC-706 and Ver 661 (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR); Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 06:40:15 -0800; Sorry - my fault. My list didn't have the 706 on it, and I forgot to add it. I will be sending out another release soon and this will be added. Tree -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlo; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-12/msg00179.html (6,934 bytes)
108. [TRLog] Stewed Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR); Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 12:26:22 -0800; As some of you are finding out - TR Log's Cabrillo output is being bounced by the picky robot. Whoever wrote that robot code should get a sense of humor... Oh wait... I wrote that code too. I will ha; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-12/msg00180.html (6,888 bytes)
109. [TRLog] RAC Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR); Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 18:46:46 -0800; Actaully, the first thing that should be done is one of the following: 1. Have the RAC talk to the Cabrillo Gods. 2. Have the RAC refrain from using the word Cabrillo, unless they say something like; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-12/msg00190.html (8,365 bytes)
110. [TRLog] Stew Pery and Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR); Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 15:11:43 -0800; There appears to be some confusion about Cabrillo and the Stew Perry. This message is intended to clear that up. 1. Cabrillo is not required. 2. Cabrillo would be preferred - if you can. 3. The robot; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-12/msg00197.html (6,370 bytes)
111. [TRLog] IC-765 Radio Control (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR); Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 08:02:18 -0800; That would be very useful. Tree -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-trlog@conte; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-11/msg00004.html (7,822 bytes)
112. [TRLog] POST dupe processing (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR); Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 21:06:24 -0800; That version of POST had a problem - that was documented here on the reflector. Tree -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative requests: trl; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-11/msg00048.html (7,029 bytes)
113. [TRLog] Time (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR); Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 22:43:31 -0800; I added a routine to POST to do this. Howver, I don't think it was in the 6.59 release. I had to use it myself as I started the contest with the clock set two hours ahead. I'll send out a new releas; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-11/msg00049.html (6,772 bytes)
114. [TRLog] Control A??? (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR); Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 09:28:34 -0800; No Control-A needed. Give it a try. Tree -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-tr; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-11/msg00053.html (7,088 bytes)
115. [TRLog] Operating time? (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR); Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 13:02:03 -0800; I could probably add a routine to POST to do this - since I could use the same routine I wrote for the log checking software. Tree -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog Submissions: trl; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-11/msg00058.html (7,105 bytes)
116. [TRLog] Cabrillo inconsistency (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR); Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 06:51:42 -0800; I can confirm. I can't tell you why the web page doesn't show this. I think Trey has pretty much just left things up there. In retrospect, he has said he should have probably done it that way in the; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-11/msg00067.html (7,161 bytes)
117. [TRLog] Alt-I only works in SS if the exchange window just has the NR (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR); Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 22:14:51 -0800; This feature only works if all you have is a number (like in the WPX). Tree -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative requests: trlog-REQUES; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-11/msg00078.html (7,812 bytes)
118. [TRLog] Alt-D bug -- I found it (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR); Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 18:53:17 -0800; Well, technically, the QSO that is started on the second radio is a S&P QSO and is handled by the SearchAndPounce section of the code. When EES&P is set to FALSE, this function will not exit with th; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-11/msg00088.html (7,645 bytes)
119. [TRLog] Update addresses (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR); Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 06:59:42 -0800; I sent out 6.60 last night (release notes follow). A number of addresses bounced when I sent it out: I will delete these. If you have a new address, please advise. 73 Tree Release notes for TR Loggin; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-11/msg00089.html (45,950 bytes)
120. [TRLog] Questions (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR); Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 06:05:38 -0800; interrupting a CQ on radio 1? Yes - reach over to radio two and use the bandswitch. Nope - all upgrades are done via e-mail now. Tree -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog Submissions:; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-11/msg00095.html (6,973 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 120
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]