Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:tree@kkn.net: 675 ]

Total 675 documents matching your query.

301. Re: [Trlog] WPX Multi-2 Serial Numbers (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 10:23:45 -0600
That must be with some other logging software than TR. :-) I think the answer to any situation where the serial number situation gets difficult is to use QSO numbers by band (a control-j option). I t
/archives//html/TRLog/2004-01/msg00048.html (7,394 bytes)

302. Re: [Trlog] Tnx to all you helpful guys!!! RE: CTRL+O & Auto-CQSpeedUP (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 12:29:42 -0600
Well, N7DR does the manual - so maybe he can claify it. I doubt I will be adding domestic QTHs to this report. When you are DX in the ARRL, you run guys - and when you type in the domestic QTH (or w
/archives//html/TRLog/2004-01/msg00052.html (8,306 bytes)

303. Re: [Trlog] Runaway WPM Speed With Auto-CQ (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 19:26:15 -0600
The command is executed when it comes up in the CW being sent. Tree _______________________________________________ Trlog mailing list Trlog@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinf
/archives//html/TRLog/2004-01/msg00059.html (8,119 bytes)

304. Re: [Trlog] Out-of-band indication gone in 6.79 (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:40:20 -0600
Pretty much now - if the radio returns a frequency that is not in a band, the program will not change bands. This was done to pretty much put an end to the NONCW issue. Sorry. Maybe after I get the
/archives//html/TRLog/2004-01/msg00089.html (7,062 bytes)

305. Re: [Trlog] Swapping Operator Names for Multi-Single? (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 10:43:06 -0600
Not really. This isn't done in practice as it creates too much confusion during the contest. Much more practical to choose one name and use it for the whole contest. Tree ____________________________
/archives//html/TRLog/2004-01/msg00125.html (6,850 bytes)

306. Re: [Trlog] TR Logged SSB QSOs as CW (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 12:13:03 -0600
Do you have the radio interfaced to the program? How was TR showing SSB? Tree _______________________________________________ Trlog mailing list Trlog@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailm
/archives//html/TRLog/2004-01/msg00132.html (7,092 bytes)

307. Re: [Trlog] TR Logged SSB QSOs as CW (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 00:48:47 -0600
No - nothing specific to the NAQP. This sounds like another reason why I am pulling my hair out redoing the whole radio interface section of the code. You might try 6.84 or something earlier until I
/archives//html/TRLog/2004-01/msg00136.html (7,968 bytes)

308. [Trlog] New version update (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 14:56:19 -0600
I thought I would update everyone on the status of the next version. As you might remember, this version has some major changes in how the radio communication is done. In fact, it affects all of the
/archives//html/TRLog/2004-01/msg00153.html (6,911 bytes)

309. Re: [Trlog] Sprint in Simulator (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 15:14:51 -0600
Someone always has this problem. The program is looking for entries in you TRMASTER.DTA file that have a name and QTH. It uses those for the contacts. My guess is that you don't have one with that in
/archives//html/TRLog/2004-01/msg00184.html (6,805 bytes)

310. Re: [Trlog] Not Enough Room for PrefixRec (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:13:01 -0600
It isn't the # of countries that is the problem. It is the number of different prefixes. Tree _______________________________________________ Trlog mailing list Trlog@contesting.com http://lists.cont
/archives//html/TRLog/2004-02/msg00008.html (7,564 bytes)

311. Re: [Trlog] ARRL VHF SS Sweepstakes (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 21:05:17 -0600
/R is fine. Or nothing. Tree _______________________________________________ Trlog mailing list Trlog@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/trlog
/archives//html/TRLog/2004-02/msg00015.html (6,358 bytes)

312. Re: [Trlog] RE: Jumping up to 679 (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 23:58:39 -0600
I predict most problems current experienced (that are the fault of TR) will get fixed by the overhaul. I also preduct some new problems not currently experienced will arise! Made a big breakthrough
/archives//html/TRLog/2004-02/msg00060.html (6,624 bytes)

313. Re: [Trlog] Another Bandmap issue (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 18:26:47 -0600
Tree says he is focused on the new radio control stuff and can't think about the bandmap right now. Tree _______________________________________________ Trlog mailing list Trlog@contesting.com http:/
/archives//html/TRLog/2004-02/msg00064.html (7,609 bytes)

314. Re: [Trlog] Cabrillo Log submission +++ (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 19:31:34 -0600
Yes. No. You should have just worked the dupes and logged them. Tree _______________________________________________ Trlog mailing list Trlog@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listin
/archives//html/TRLog/2004-03/msg00009.html (7,231 bytes)

315. RE: [lu6etb@cvtci.com.ar: [Trlog] WPX Multi-Single numbering]] (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 17:06:09 -0600
Here is the answer to Arturo's question: From: "merchant@garlic.com" <merchant@garlic.com> To: tree@kkn.net Subject: RE: [lu6etb@cvtci.com.ar: [Trlog] WPX Multi-Single numbering] Date: Thu, 25 Mar 20
/archives//html/TRLog/2004-03/msg00030.html (9,758 bytes)

316. Re: [lu6etb@cvtci.com.ar: [Trlog] WPX Multi-Single numbering]] (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:04:27 -0600
Yes. That is correct, but K6AW is now the WPX chairman. Yes - same answer. Tree _______________________________________________ Trlog mailing list Trlog@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mai
/archives//html/TRLog/2004-03/msg00033.html (7,473 bytes)

317. Re: [Trlog] RE: Incremental tuning from keyboard (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:43:18 -0600
I think this is the case for all radios that support VFO increment and decrement commands. Go into the S&P mode and use the shift keys. Tree _______________________________________________ Trlog mail
/archives//html/TRLog/2004-03/msg00040.html (7,367 bytes)

318. Re: [Trlog] RE: Incremental tuning from keyboard (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:47:39 -0600
The overhead associated with doing all of those commands over the serial port makes it pretty impractical. I have tried using this technique to adjust the RIT on some of the radios that don't have an
/archives//html/TRLog/2004-03/msg00042.html (8,114 bytes)

319. Re: [Trlog] Need help getting back on using TR (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 19:37:40 -0500
COM1 = SERIAL1 Tree Cell 503 913 8123 _______________________________________________ Trlog mailing list Trlog@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/trlog
/archives//html/TRLog/2004-04/msg00011.html (6,737 bytes)

320. [Trlog] Radio interface work (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 14:11:36 -0500
Well - as you no doubt have noticed, there haven't been any updates for awhile. I am continuing to work on the major effort of fixing the radio interface issues with a more elegant solution. Unfortun
/archives//html/TRLog/2004-05/msg00018.html (7,032 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu