Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ua4wae@mail.ru: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: inverted L issues (score: 1)
Author: ALEXEY OGORODOV <ua4wae@mail.ru>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 06:37:52 +0400
Hello, Right to the point.  At HD2A we installed an Inverted L with the following dimensions: vertical portion 16m horizontal portion 26m. The horizontal wire goes with slightly upward with with its
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00274.html (7,030 bytes)

2. Topband: 160INVERTED L (score: 1)
Author: ALEXEY OGORODOV <ua4wae@mail.ru>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 07:24:50 +0400
Hello, Thanks  to everyone who found time and desire to help us out. Special thanks to Jose, N4BAA for the very informative QSO. I've got enough information for starts. Let me try to implement some o
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00012.html (6,596 bytes)

3. Topband: A simple question about EWE (score: 1)
Author: ALEXEY OGORODOV <ua4wae@mail.ru>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 20:26:30 +0400
Hello,brethren-in-low-bands, Anyone who has had experience with EWE antennas please share the wealth of your knowledge: 1. How critical are the physical parameters of the aerial, e.g. if I go 3 meter
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00218.html (7,153 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: A35 (score: 1)
Author: ALEXEY OGORODOV <ua4wae@mail.ru>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 03:29:13 +0400
Steve, With all due respect to the renown ops, in Ecuador it sounds like they are having problems on every single band =) Barely audible. working weither EU JA or NA =) A disappointment.... BTW prett
/archives//html/Topband/2014-04/msg00018.html (7,370 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: A35 (score: 1)
Author: ALEXEY OGORODOV <ua4wae@mail.ru>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 18:54:34 +0400
Herb, That is exactly what I was reffering to. Also, using the opportunity to be heard by a large audience, Iīd like to ask future peditioners to pay more attention to SA cosidering that is not only
/archives//html/Topband/2014-04/msg00021.html (10,338 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Where was everyone last night (score: 1)
Author: ALEXEY OGORODOV <ua4wae@mail.ru>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 22:41:31 +0400
Hi all, I expected more from the event. Conditions were not bad altogether but very little activity. Some frustration from calling but not being heard. The best DX of the night - w1aw/kl7 ran by Kevi
/archives//html/Topband/2014-06/msg00179.html (7,180 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Where was everyone last night (score: 1)
Author: ALEXEY OGORODOV <ua4wae@mail.ru>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 01:59:29 +0400
Folks, I think it's a normal occurance - sometimes we hear, sometimes we don't. The whole magic of radio is in it otherwise we would've stuck to landlines and cellphones. Summer condition was at its
/archives//html/Topband/2014-06/msg00183.html (10,315 bytes)

8. Topband: anybody in Eu using JT-9 or JT-65 (score: 1)
Author: ALEXEY OGORODOV <ua4wae@mail.ru>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 19:00:55 +0400
Hello brethren, Iīm ready to be crucified yet I couldnīt resist asking a question: What's the value of JT modes qso for a dxer? IMHO Digimodes undermine the value of low band dxing. I don't arfue ove
/archives//html/Topband/2014-08/msg00095.html (7,647 bytes)

9. Topband: Stew Perry - aftermath (score: 1)
Author: ALEXEY OGORODOV <ua4wae@mail.ru>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 00:48:48 +0300
Hello brethren, It is somewhat reconciliating to know that conditions were ugly everywhere. I invested some 9 plus ours to get only 52 qs. The best distance DX was KH6AT, Bryce was loud and gave me g
/archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00423.html (7,225 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: CQWW160 Remote receiver rule (score: 1)
Author: ALEXEY OGORODOV <ua4wae@mail.ru>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:47:23 +0300
Hello brethren, Iīm one of  those who lives and operates from a noise-infested location. It is within my abilities to build a remote station a few miles away. Yet, I ask you and myself 'will it be of
/archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00121.html (10,996 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: CQWW160 Remote receiver rule (score: 1)
Author: ALEXEY OGORODOV <ua4wae@mail.ru>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 21:37:21 +0300
Brethren, why are there rules? In our case they were cset in order to create a reasonable fair playground limits for the MAJORITY of participants. The majority still falls into the conditions describ
/archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00125.html (13,761 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: CQWW160 Remote receiver rule (score: 1)
Author: ALEXEY OGORODOV <ua4wae@mail.ru>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 21:55:25 +0300
Wayne, true but we pretend that we live in a perfect world. =) Ham Radio is one of the easiest ways to feel acomplished. But thatīs another topic and rather of  psychological and social field. =) Ser
/archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00128.html (16,490 bytes)

13. Topband: EP6T and outside world (score: 1)
Author: ALEXEY OGORODOV <ua4wae@mail.ru>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 23:26:10 +0300
That has kept me preplexed since the expedition began - not a single word in the TB reflector. How come? Usually even a minor expedition with TB claims is being widely discussed. I think everyone in
/archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00131.html (7,302 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: CQWW160 Remote receiver rule (score: 1)
Author: ALEXEY OGORODOV <ua4wae@mail.ru>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 21:37:08 +0300
Dado and brethren concerned, You are right about the qso definition. And you are right again narrowing the subject to what would be commonly accepted as a QTH. As I remember from contesting back in 8
/archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00169.html (24,604 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: EP6T and outside world (score: 1)
Author: ALEXEY OGORODOV <ua4wae@mail.ru>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 21:45:34 +0300
Hello brethren, I have to complain and name the names. It is a second day in a row that I become the object of QRM. I come to a freq 3514 in particular, ask QRL? and, not receiving any objections, be
/archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00170.html (8,492 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: CW160 (score: 1)
Author: ALEXEY OGORODOV <ua4wae@mail.ru>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 01:15:44 +0300
Hi guys, Conditions are not bad. I'm running about 80-90 watts to my TL 23 meter Vertical with 40 radials. No RX to speak of if a 80M Inv L with 2 radials counts. So far 180 q's, some EU. No condx to
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00722.html (12,165 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu