Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:us5we@bk.ru: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Topband: Improving the Fabulous CQ 160 Contest (score: 1)
Author: Victor Goncharsky <us5we@bk.ru>
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:41:15 +0300
I think the exchange 59(9) plus 6-character grid ie KN29AU will give the exact distance between the two. Most if not all contest software support this format which is widely used in VHF contesting. U
/archives//html/Topband/2009-01/msg00040.html (9,997 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: topband: Web Based Receivers.. (score: 1)
Author: Victor Goncharsky <us5we@bk.ru>
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 13:20:11 +0300
This common "non-stop calling" operating practice has nothing to do with WEB based receivers but rather poor receiving and bad operating skills. If one uses WEB receiver he can easily calculate the a
/archives//html/Topband/2010-01/msg00088.html (7,481 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Mother of all ferrite common-mode coaxial chokes (score: 1)
Author: "Victor Goncharsky US5WE" <us5we@bk.ru>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 01:49:06 -0800
Using them a lot between VHF and UHF boxes to break ground RF paths. Really helps to prevens all kinds of unpredictable oscillation effects. Planning to be on 160 this coming season to finish Tob Ban
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00144.html (9,069 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: The use of digital modes on 160 metres (score: 1)
Author: "Victor Goncharsky US5WE" <us5we@bk.ru>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 03:44:05 -0500
IARU R1 HF band plan. Just for information. http://www.iaru-r1.org/index.php?option=com_remository&Itemid=&func=fileinfo&id=404 -- 73 Vic US5WE/K1WE (UW5W in VHF contests) KN29AU UARL VHF committee C
/archives//html/Topband/2012-09/msg00098.html (8,051 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Need help to improve DX on 1/2 acre lot from CA(kr6c@juno.com) (score: 1)
Author: Victor Goncharsky <us5we@bk.ru>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 11:20:03 +0400
This is only partially true. If a DXpedition is carefully planned, like, say, VP6DX and I'm sure upcoming Clipperton will be, it will be heard by thousands and one needs everything he/she has +1 dB t
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00138.html (9,854 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: QSL 7O6T Socotra Isl (score: 1)
Author: Victor Goncharsky <us5we@bk.ru>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 19:31:12 +0400
I received 7O6T QSLs for 80-10 today directly. Paid $5 as requested. Missed them on 160 as started to chase for them on TB too late for EU. 73 Vic _________________ Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00001.html (7,866 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: HS0ZEE SUMMARY (score: 1)
Author: Victor Goncharsky <us5we@bk.ru>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 19:33:21 +0400
He called me in CQWW160 and it was painless QSO. 73 Vic _________________ Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00002.html (7,850 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL (score: 1)
Author: Victor Goncharsky <us5we@bk.ru>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 17:54:56 +0400
I was taught this kind of antenna during two semester course at radio department of Lvov Polytechnic at the begining of 70's. A lot of formulas and diagrams...  UA1DZ (SK) used this kind of array of
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00047.html (11,269 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: High performance RX antenna at T6LG (score: 1)
Author: Victor Goncharsky <us5we@bk.ru>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:51:12 +0400
Arunas, Was it shieded FTP-5, SFTP-5 or just unshieded UTP-5  At work we measured the single pair impedance being around 100 Ohm on 10 MHz. Do you use any kind balun-transformer at the receiving end?
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00151.html (11,172 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: 75 ohm coax to twisted pair Adaptors (score: 1)
Author: Victor Goncharsky <us5we@bk.ru>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 15:52:48 +0400
Hope this will be of some interest for those using twisted pair instead of coax. The company I work for is manufacuring all kinds of 75 Ohm / UTP balun adapters and surge protection units. The one I
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00273.html (9,951 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: A35 (score: 1)
Author: Victor Goncharsky <us5we@bk.ru>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 20:00:39 +0400
Hi folks, I have always  been thinking that Amsterdam I. is in Indian Ocean. Did they move it to Pacific for a DXpedition?  Seriously, I have finally was able to tune my new 27.5 meter vertical with
/archives//html/Topband/2014-04/msg00022.html (12,013 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: topband report from 4V1JB (score: 1)
Author: Victor Goncharsky <us5we@bk.ru>
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 16:36:14 +0300
Hi All, 4V1JR was the only Carribean multiplier than did not answer me on 10 meters (SOSB HIGH 10m this year). To get others one or two calls from newly installed 6 element quad  https://www.youtube.
/archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00059.html (8,962 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: JA's this morning on 160 (score: 1)
Author: Victor Goncharsky <us5we@bk.ru>
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 13:15:52 +0300
Hi Mike, We have the similar, very informative RUS-ENG site here. http://www.tesis.lebedev.ru/forecast_activity.html Both me and Helen have finished our EM-EO90WF activity and are back trying to comp
/archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00017.html (9,996 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: CQWW160 Remote receiver rule (score: 1)
Author: Victor Goncharsky <us5we@bk.ru>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 21:56:02 +0300
Hi folks, I have the receiving site in KN18QU with Afedri SDR-NET and bidirectional NW-SE (after terminator was removed) beverage. Setup is similar to VO1HP's. The distance between KN18QU and KN29AU
/archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00129.html (7,697 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: CQWW160 Remote receiver rule (score: 1)
Author: Victor Goncharsky <us5we@bk.ru>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:46:48 +0300
Hi Mike, I remember somebody in OK-land had similar idea. I see no problem when someone is making the RX site for his own personal use. -- 73, Victor Goncharsky US5WE/K1WE (UW5W in VHF contests, EO90
/archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00144.html (9,534 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: EP6T and outside world (score: 1)
Author: Victor Goncharsky <us5we@bk.ru>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:00:37 +0300
Hi Jim, I think authorities did their best to allow ON folks all frequencies they wanted. The problem,I think, is purely technical. Their low band signals aren't strong even here in KN29AU. Just comp
/archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00145.html (9,318 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: 160m WAS (need WY and NV) (score: 1)
Author: Victor Goncharsky <us5we@bk.ru>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 16:39:06 +0300
Just the request on the same subject but different band. I'm working hard to complete 5BWAS and need only 3 states on 80 meters AK, NE and NV. Trying to be there on CW almost daily around my SR (0600
/archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00210.html (8,134 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: 160m WAS (need WY and NV) (score: 1)
Author: Victor Goncharsky <us5we@bk.ru>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 23:25:32 +0300
Hi Jim, Thanks for the response. I've wrote a request to both superstations but no positive response. Will be trying with KL7KY and WL7E. I was also advised to get in touch with N7XM and N6ET in NV.
/archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00221.html (12,256 bytes)

19. Re: Topband: 160m WAS need AK via LOTW (score: 1)
Author: Victor Goncharsky <us5we@bk.ru>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 23:28:39 +0300
Thanks Dave, This is what I was looking for. CU on Low Bands -- 73, Victor Goncharsky US5WE/K1WE (UW5W in VHF contests, EO90WF in 2014), P.E. UARL Technical and VHF Committies DXCC Honor Roll #1 (Mix
/archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00222.html (9,795 bytes)

20. Re: Topband: Out-of-Turn Callers DX Expedition finances (score: 1)
Author: Victor Goncharsky <us5we@bk.ru>
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 11:14:43 +0300
Garry, In the good old days when I was learning the art of ham radio from Don Miller's DX and contest operations and my Dad UB5WF, I've got an idea of the ham spirit that makes all of us equal under
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00296.html (9,687 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu