Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ve4xt@mts.net: 348 ]

Total 348 documents matching your query.

281. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 12:36:13 -0500
I'm with OV. The word 'any' is pretty all-inclusive. After 30 years in professional writing, I have a pretty good idea what the word 'any' means. Those that speculate that it only refers to other peo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00196.html (15,300 bytes)

282. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:21:29 -0500
It seems the only people now arguing that computer logging, auto-tune amplifiers or the like should constitute "assistance" are those arguing for the unfettered release of Skimmer into the contesting
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00240.html (9,335 bytes)

283. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:56:11 -0500
Then, Joe, one question: why do you? 73, kelly ve4xt _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00247.html (8,848 bytes)

284. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:55:37 -0500
_______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00249.html (14,196 bytes)

285. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 21:35:23 -0500
I think the key is to define what constitutes assistance. Once you have done that, then an operator either IS or IS NOT assisted. Assistance, for the purposes of this contest, shall be construed to m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00263.html (15,996 bytes)

286. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:03:48 -0500
Hi Chris, Interesting suggestion, though I suspect it has a flaw that you may not yet have considered. Not everybody who wishes to SO2R wishes to use 1kw or play in the same pond as the QRO boys. Ple
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00337.html (16,480 bytes)

287. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Skimmer - Don't Change Anything (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:10:01 -0500
Paul, Why are those arguing to treat something that walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and looks like a duck as a duck "whiners"? I am not whining about Skimmer: I celebrate the advance in technol
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00344.html (10,941 bytes)

288. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:08:11 -0500
Mike, K1MK wrote:> If we do not presume competence on the part of the writer as to how This is EXACTLY why I can't fathom how anyone could argue that the WW rule "DX Alerting assistance of any kind..
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00461.html (9,003 bytes)

289. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 08:19:08 -0500
Hi Paul, Your assumption of my (and perhaps others') interests in deeming Skimmer assistance is just a touch off the mark. I am not worried about something that makes what we do more efficient. Effic
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00471.html (11,946 bytes)

290. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:44:55 -0500
Exactly my point. You did not copy the callsign. Thanks for making it crystal clear. 73, kelly ve4xt _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00477.html (8,994 bytes)

291. Re: [CQ-Contest] Busted Exchanges - how to log them? (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:05:05 -0500
If the local got all the information he needed from the VE8, the contact counts, even if it took a few tries. I've overheard many contest Qs that go like this: ...contest Whiskey Five Big Zipper W5BZ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00244.html (11,269 bytes)

292. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL and Open Logs - Time for the next step? (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:21:04 -0500
As much as Vladimir's example below is repugnant, and those who told him such should be deeply ashamed, and as much as I may not wish to see the "open log" concept applied to all contests, I wonder i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00293.html (11,280 bytes)

293. Re: [CQ-Contest] 99% of uniques are busted (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 13:37:14 -0500
You do not need to send in a log to not see your call shown as a unique. If you have a unique in the log, it means that station worked you and absolutely nobody else who submitted a log. Possible? Ye
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00042.html (9,235 bytes)

294. [CQ-Contest] WW CW, looking for FL chair (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:43:08 -0500
Hi all, My family is planning a holiday to Disneyworld, and I've convinced my wife to let it end/begin just before/after the WW CW. I am interested in operating WW CW from the general vicinity. My pr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00272.html (7,829 bytes)

295. Re: [CQ-Contest] How do you get better? (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:47:51 -0500
With all due respect, Shelby, I think this is incredibly narrow-minded. At its word, your suggestion would bar anyone who is less than perfect from any contest, since we are ALL using contests to get
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-10/msg00338.html (10,582 bytes)

296. [CQ-Contest] n1mm (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 20:37:55 -0600
Hi all, Does N1MM support the QSY rule in Sprint the way TR does? (In other words, can it be set so it does NOT assume that it's OK to keep CQing after the first CQed QSO?) Cheers, Kelly Ve4xt ______
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00103.html (6,367 bytes)

297. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Exchange sequence (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 08:11:48 -0600
Isn't it possible that by inserting an example... W1AW 123 B NU1AW 71 CT ...in the rules, the League is specifying how the exchange should be sent? That said, an object of the contest is not to pract
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00110.html (10,482 bytes)

298. Re: [CQ-Contest] Learning Morse (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 21:22:16 -0600
Hi Rick, One thing I've noticed about MOST CW training software is it assumes a quiet, QRM-free environment. Probably OK for getting started, but in a contesting environment, you'll be dealing with a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00168.html (10,130 bytes)

299. [CQ-Contest] CQ Orlando, Fla. (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:00:50 -0600
Hi all, I'm leaving for Orlando on Sunday. Will be there from Nov. 16 to Nov. 27. If anyone in the area would like to propose an eyeball, please let me know. I'll be checking this e-mail as much as p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00226.html (6,738 bytes)

300. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spotting Errors (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 08:40:33 -0600
Here's another perspective: not to totally disagree with Ken's advice, but you have to pick your spots when deciding to wade into a pileup to only ask the running station for his call. At 6y1v on the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00085.html (12,568 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu