Mail Archive Search: <+from:ve7jkz@telus.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:ve7jkz@telus.net: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Radio Antenna Engineering - Laport (score: 1): Author: Brian_ve7jkz <ve7jkz@telus.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 23:32:37 -0700; Nonsense. For research purposes, just put up a balloon vertical on a calm day in some remote area. Set up a transmit source a mile away and compare received signal strength vs height. Temporarily rol; /archives//html/Topband/2011-09/msg00115.html (8,330 bytes)
2. Topband: ARRL 160 conditions (score: 1): Author: Brian_ve7jkz <ve7jkz@telus.net>; Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 09:02:01 -0800; Very disappointing indeed, although always nice to work the east coast, ME, WNY, VA, MAR (PEI) etc from the wet coast. And CE3 was a nice one. For the propagation experts out there did the poor condi; /archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00042.html (7,845 bytes)
3. Topband: ARRL 160 Conditions (score: 1): Author: Brian_ve7jkz <ve7jkz@telus.net>; Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:11:37 -0800; Lots of useful stuff posted, but I haven't seen anything on why propagation was so poor. Is this is a function of solar flux up, 160m down, or what? It's often said that 160/80 are much better at the; /archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00105.html (7,766 bytes)
4. Topband: Conway Reef (score: 1): Author: Brian_ve7jkz <ve7jkz@telus.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 17:05:32 -0700; A couple of mornings ago I worked RW0CR at 1209Z, then 3D2C at 1305Z. Pretty much one hour before my local sunrise. Brian VE7JKZ _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9; /archives//html/Topband/2012-09/msg00341.html (6,422 bytes)
5. Topband: TX5K (score: 1): Author: Brian_ve7jkz <ve7jkz@telus.net>; Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 11:23:34 -0800; An excellent operation indeed as previously noted. I would call it a model operation. I listened to them last night cq'ing EU and working stations I couldn't hear, darn it. Then after an hour or so t; /archives//html/Topband/2013-03/msg00048.html (6,655 bytes)
6. Topband: Low dipole for receiving (score: 1): Author: Brian_ve7jkz <ve7jkz@telus.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 20:38:35 -0700; I've been looking at a very low dipole to hopefully assist in receiving. Living in suburbia space is limited but thanks to a helpful neighbor I could put up something in the shape of an L. I would ha; /archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00253.html (7,071 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: Low dipole for receiving (score: 1): Author: Brian_ve7jkz <ve7jkz@telus.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 07:34:03 -0700; Good suggestion Bill. Yes, I could get a loop around the place, probably close to a half wave on 160 as well. Tnx for the suggestion. Brian VE7JKZ On 9/18/2013 4:40 AM, BY THE LAKE wrote: Do you have; /archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00255.html (8,264 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: Low dipole for receiving (score: 1): Author: Brian_ve7jkz <ve7jkz@telus.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 07:45:59 -0700; I wonder too if it's worth the effort, Grant, OTOH there's not much to lose for a few hours work to install and then try out. I've tried various loops and things over the years and the BC band filter; /archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00256.html (9,875 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: Low dipole for receiving (score: 1): Author: Brian_ve7jkz <ve7jkz@telus.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 08:41:42 -0700; Thanks John, interesting and encouraging. Brian VE7JKZ On 9/18/2013 7:54 AM, John Kaufmann wrote: I also use a low dipole, ten feet high, as a supplementary receiving antenna. It's a random length, n; /archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00258.html (9,077 bytes)
10. Re: Topband: Low dipole for receiving (score: 1): Author: Brian_ve7jkz <ve7jkz@telus.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 22:09:04 -0700; Tnx Tim, interesting reading. Brian VE7JKZ "Inexpensive Receive Antennas for Top Band" http://topbanddinner.com/page_presentations.html The low dipole at K3LR (20 feet high) is one of my favorite (pe; /archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00270.html (9,844 bytes)
11. Re: Topband: Low dipole for receiving (score: 1): Author: Brian_ve7jkz <ve7jkz@telus.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 22:15:04 -0700; I've read good things about the Wellbrook Ashton, but I've not had much success with various types of loops over the years and the Wellbrook is big bucks; more than I'm willing to put out if it turns; /archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00271.html (11,375 bytes)
12. Topband: N1MM and 3830 (160m Contest) (score: 1): Author: Brian_ve7jkz <ve7jkz@telus.net>; Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2013 13:43:16 -0800; My score summary from N1MM reports 313 Qs, 692 points, 66 sections, for a total score of 45,672. (692*66=45,672). 3830 requires I report QSOs, sections, countries, and then total score. How do I rela; /archives//html/Topband/2013-12/msg00092.html (6,740 bytes)
13. Topband: Dallas Lankford antennas (score: 1): Author: Brian_ve7jkz <ve7jkz@telus.net>; Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 19:44:10 -0800; Dallas speaks highly of his vertical receiving antennas which he refers to as 'low noise'. Approx 23 feet or so in height with a transformer 5ft above ground, then a pair of wires to a similar transf; /archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00081.html (6,654 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]