Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:vhfplus@gmail.com: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: What kind of mast is good for inverted L? (score: 1)
Author: Jack Parker <vhfplus@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:23:56 -0700
I have used 40 feet of fibreglass cammo support tube. Ten 4-foot tubes on each end of the inverted-L. Just minimal 1/4-wave radials (3 or 4) and guyed at 3 levels with Dacron line. It held up nicely
/archives//html/Topband/2009-09/msg00096.html (9,066 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: L network matching (score: 1)
Author: Jack Parker <vhfplus@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 21:37:33 -0700
Here's another possibility: http://home.sandiego.edu/~ekim/e194rfs01/jwmatcher/matcher2.html I've used this a couple of times and it seems to work. 73, -- Jack, W6NF Silver Springs, NV DM09ji _______
/archives//html/Topband/2009-10/msg00129.html (8,359 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Opening last nite Oct 14 (score: 1)
Author: Jack Parker <vhfplus@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:37:06 -0700
R1FJM was huge here at 0741Z. My noise level was S9 and he was well above that! A new one for me on Topband, but most DX *is* new for me :>) -- Jack, W6NF Silver Springs, NV DM09ji __________________
/archives//html/Topband/2009-10/msg00159.html (8,298 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: TX3A this morning (score: 1)
Author: Jack Parker <vhfplus@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 05:31:32 -0800
A chip shot here at 0935Z...honest 599, little QSB and easy even with my 100 watts. Now for 80 and 40. -- Jack, W6NF Silver Springs, NV DM09ji _______________________________________________ 160 mete
/archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00196.html (8,573 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: R1FJM 160m QSL (score: 1)
Author: Jack Parker <vhfplus@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 05:26:14 -0800
Don't know about paper QSLs but I have a confirmation from R1FJM in Logbook of The World...worked 10/14/2009 and LoTW confirmation received the next day. -- Jack, W6NF Silver Springs, NV DM09ji _____
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00059.html (7,426 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Correlation between AM BCB propagation and topband? (score: 1)
Author: "Jack/W6NF" <vhfplus@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 05:35:09 -0800
Hi, Rick: Just the old broadcaster in me but the station in Reno on 780 is KKOH, not KOH. They still refer to themselves as KOH, trying to claim a bit of the legacy they lost when Citadel bought the
/archives//html/Topband/2010-01/msg00057.html (10,009 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: SDR-IQ experience during CQ 160 contest (score: 1)
Author: "Jack/W6NF" <vhfplus@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 11:34:11 -0800
I have just ordered one of KB9YIG's SoftRock v9.0/USB kits with the programmable oscillator and BPF. I intend to play with this as a 2nd receiver on 160 using the N6RK loop antenna. I was concerned a
/archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00077.html (8,755 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Topband QSL Library (score: 1)
Author: Jack/W6NF <vhfplus@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:15:33 -0800
I bought my XYL (K7MKL) a photo album which is 3 cards high by one car wide. Two cards, back to back, in each slot and big enough for the cards she has now. I also bought a couple of packs of expansi
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00143.html (8,925 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Topband QSL Library (score: 1)
Author: Jack/W6NF <vhfplus@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:50:14 -0800
Just curious: How many medium quality QSL card scans will a typical digital picture frame support? I am in the process of making a display of QSLs from some 330 DXCC entities (not mine, unfortunately
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00154.html (8,067 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: VP6T (score: 1)
Author: Jack/W6NF <vhfplus@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:33:17 -0800
My XYL, K7MKL, has had her Extra for less than a year and her General not much more than that. She is thrilled by the DX QSLs she's been able to acquire and wants to get one from every DXCC entity sh
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00024.html (9,183 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Proper Decorum On The "Gentleman's Band"... (score: 1)
Author: Jack/W6NF <vhfplus@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:28:33 -0800
But, then, at 5w EIRP I guess the playing field is level. You just have to work on your receive antenna! -- Jack, W6NF Silver Springs, NV DM09ji _______________________________________________ UR RST
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00097.html (10,480 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Proper Decorum On The "Gentleman's Band"... (score: 1)
Author: Jack/W6NF <vhfplus@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:13:23 -0800
You should see the loading coil used at the Fallon LORAN station! At least the diameter if a 55 gallon drum to match the 600-foot vertical. Quite impressive. -- Jack, W6NF Silver Springs, NV DM09ji _
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00103.html (12,186 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: Vertical vs yagi (score: 1)
Author: Jack/W6NF <vhfplus@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:18:22 -0800
Hi, Josep: Given the simplicity and minimal expense, the 2 element vertical performs well. Before being able to afford the Comtek 4-square phasing system last year I had a 2-element 40-meter array up
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00223.html (9,945 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: EIRP Measurement (score: 1)
Author: Jack/W6NF <vhfplus@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:05:01 -0800
It's been many years since I have had to make any AM broadcast field measurements. I don't recall if the Potomac Instruments, or other, FIMs go much below 550kHz. 73, -- Jack, W6NF Silver Springs, NV
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00306.html (8,882 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: EIRP Measurement (score: 1)
Author: Jack/W6NF <vhfplus@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:22:37 -0800
Yes, I am aware of that, having been CE at several DAs, including one critical night-time array. I was thinking that, if the FIMs covered the necessary frequencies, EIRP could be inferred by measurin
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00313.html (10,975 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu