Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:victor@brecnet.com: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Low HF Band Propagation (score: 1)
Author: victor@brecnet.com (Victor Blackwell)
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 11:32:44 -0400
SECC Gang, If you work 80-40-30 meters, here is an approach of knowing what is happening propagation wise. The web site is up and running in a bare bones manner. Support information is being added we
/archives//html/SECC/2001-04/msg00030.html (6,234 bytes)

2. [SECC] 160 band plan comments (score: 1)
Author: victor@brecnet.com (Victor Blackwell)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 17:38:41 -0500
Splits on forty is just fine. SSB would be unworkable without it. And many stations on work splits on CW. Check out what happens during large pileups. Ask Joe when he gets back. Vic AD8K -- SECC on t
/archives//html/SECC/2001-03/msg00068.html (7,364 bytes)

3. [SECC] 160 band plan comments (score: 1)
Author: victor@brecnet.com (Victor Blackwell)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 20:13:08 -0500
Think of splits as lid control. Simplex is horrible these days. The lids call even when they can't hear the DX. Vic AD8K -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.c
/archives//html/SECC/2001-03/msg00070.html (7,527 bytes)

4. [SECC] 160 band plan comments (score: 1)
Author: victor@brecnet.com (Victor Blackwell)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:08:21 -0500
Hey, maybe you are right. I noticed you mentioned SSB. Sorry don't know a thing about it on 160. Just keep it out of the window so we can work split on CW. Vic AD8K -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.c
/archives//html/SECC/2001-03/msg00081.html (7,464 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu