Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:vr2bg@harts.org.hk: 134 ]

Total 134 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TowerTalk] New antenna system (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 15:11:29 +0000
Bandwidth must be as cheap as petrol in some places... 73, HL1/VR2BrettGraham _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless We
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00250.html (12,204 bytes)

62. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 15:59:25 +0000
N4ZR added: There have been lots of reports of single feed problems with the C-31XR (and lots of people who are quite happy with the single feed) but the idea of needing to feed a C-3 with 3 separate
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00295.html (8,466 bytes)

63. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 14:09:44 +0000
W6RMK asked: In order to get a reasonable match, perhaps, but wouldn't being able to use one C-3 on >1 band simultaneously be a good reason to go with separate feeders? ;^) And there's a demanding te
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00308.html (9,996 bytes)

64. [TowerTalk] C-3E/A (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 01:08:33 +0000
I just put up a second-hand C-3, which I've converted to separate feeds. 10 & 20 are fine, but on 15m the driver is reasonant near 20 Mc & becomes more reasonable when the 20m driver is either shorte
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00618.html (7,029 bytes)

65. Re: [TowerTalk] (another)Problem That Needs Ideas (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 16:10:28 +0000
N4GI asked: Don't have an RCS8V, but it reminds me of a problem I occasionally have with a sixpack switch... One or two of the ports on one side are intermittent unless I click the brake of my ham ro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00181.html (8,619 bytes)

66. Re: [TowerTalk] Problem That Needs Ideas (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 00:08:25 +0000
KK9A added: Interesting theory Brett. I own two Sixpaks and I've had similar problems with each, especially when using a Top Ten band decoder to control them. I felt the problem was there was not eno
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00200.html (10,033 bytes)

67. Re: [TowerTalk] pushup mast source and other comments (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 08:55:04 +0000
W6RMK commented on K5UJ's suggestion on securing guys to a push-up mast: go with ropes Do you clamp the rope around the eye, or at some distance? I'm having a tough time visualizing exactly what you'
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00549.html (10,197 bytes)

68. Re: [TowerTalk] pushup mast source and other comments (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 22:50:20 +0000
K5UJ continued: I clamp the rope about 2 inches away from the eye. it probably doesn't matter much except that if you try to snug the pliars right up on the eye, it would be harder to do and squeeze
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00579.html (10,148 bytes)

69. Re: [TowerTalk] The other side of the story (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 02:21:23 +0000
I have watched this, thinking from the beginning how unfortunate to see what goods returned to an address the seller may no longer be located at could turn into. Hopefully at least we have all learne
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00419.html (7,857 bytes)

70. Re: [TowerTalk] geo888@cs.com (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 00:05:21 +0000
Yes, let's bin everybody with arrl.net, contesting.com & all other forwarding or alias domain email addresses. Just because one bloke screwed up, sod the lot of 'em, those lazy buggers! I hope I can
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00425.html (8,709 bytes)

71. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Trees, Mountains, 15 degrees... (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:12:29 +0000
W7PUP asked if a 15 degree takeoff is of concern. Worst directions for me have been as high as 18 degrees. Had 16 degrees to NA LP from the only QTH where I've been heard in W1 on 160m. Had about a 1
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg01139.html (8,434 bytes)

72. Re: [TowerTalk] hi-pwr balun for tri-band quad available anywhere? (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 02:49:03 +0000
K7VS asked: As in feeding the three loops simultaneously? If so, not much point doing so as the pattern will be mucked up with the parallel drivers. I have opted for RG303 & beads for choking the fee
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00223.html (7,640 bytes)

73. Re: [TowerTalk] Was: Getting antennas into the shack. Now: SO2Rantenna switching (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 00:39:33 +0000
WS1L had asked about antenna switching matrixes. Certainly a prospective homebrew project, though purchasing something means somebody else gets to source the relays, do the physical fabrication & get
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00364.html (8,112 bytes)

74. Re: [TowerTalk] How can a SteppIR Perform So Well? (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 22:01:20 +0000
There is one thing the SteppIR cannot do. Operate on >1 band simultaneously. 73, VR2BrettGraham _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Tow
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00500.html (8,962 bytes)

75. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna attributes (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 01:47:02 +0000
N2EA added: <snip> The thing I've found as I do more SO2R is that there is a lot of stuff out there (read: multipliers) to be had long after I would have pretty much given up on that band with only o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00515.html (9,005 bytes)

76. Re: [TowerTalk] How can a SteppIR Perform So Well? (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 01:55:48 +0000
NM5G added: That's a tribander plus something for 40, being used on one band of the tribander & 40 at the same time. I mean using two bands of the tribander at the same time. 73, VR2BrettGraham _____
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00517.html (8,766 bytes)

77. Re: [TowerTalk] How can a SteppIR Perform So Well? (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 02:24:17 +0000
NI1N added: Yes, beaming one direction on two bands sometimes is not helpful. That's why - along with trying to avoid interaction - the SteppIR perpendicular to the beam is a great solution when the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00522.html (10,358 bytes)

78. Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum Fence wire for elevated radials (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 00:29:30 +0000
K3NC asked: Potential for breakage due to flexing? At some point, I expect to see the same of the copper-cladded steel wire in the ladder line I use for my stub-tuned elevated radials. Even single ra
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00775.html (8,412 bytes)

79. Re: [TowerTalk] QUAD FEEDING (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 01:37:01 +0000
"bobt" asked: Have a look at W4RNL's analysis of feeding quads (www.cebik.com). I've put up four LBQs, two of them I regularly used. I recently had a chance to use one that has split feeders & proper
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00799.html (11,817 bytes)

80. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: Moxon rectangles (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 04:27:25 +0000
GW3NJW posted: Sounds familiar. I have made several wire-only Moxons for the upper HF bands based on the dimension calculator on W4RNL's site. The antennas were mounted say 13m above ground (5m above
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00825.html (9,996 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu