Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w0eea@sbbco.net: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] A practical consideration (score: 1)
Author: <w0eea@sbbco.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 20:07:23 -0600
Hello Stan and the group, Sorry but you have your history wrong... The first contest won by rovers using grid circling was the January 1992 VHF Sweepstakes. WB9EEA/R (+AA9D) did one full four corners
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00375.html (10,449 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Multiple Calls, Same Rover [was: Septemebr VHF (score: 1)
Author: <w0eea@sbbco.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 20:46:59 -0600
Hi Ev and Tom, General Rule 3.5 is brought forward into the "General Rules for ARRL Contests on Bands Above 50 MHz" by Rule number 1.3 therein. Rule 1.3 is equal in force to rules 2.3.1 and 2.3.2...
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-09/msg00047.html (10,909 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Multiple Calls,Same Rover (score: 1)
Author: <w0eea@sbbco.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 21:27:38 -0600
Ev, Tom, Mark and others who find this topic of interest, After I posted my last message I went back and reread the relavent rules. Rules 2.3.1 and 2.3.2 are general prohibitions. Rule 1.3 restates t
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-09/msg00049.html (7,377 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Andros 2 piece N connectors (score: 1)
Author: <w0eea@sbbco.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 04:29:48 -0600
I am getting ready to install my VHF/UHF antennas soon. Anyone use the Andros 2-piece N connector? What do you think? I am a bit skeptical, always thought Amphenol made the best N connectors, was una
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00130.html (7,966 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] Pointing towards the weak ones (score: 1)
Author: <w0eea@sbbco.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 04:13:55 -0600
This is a common problem for any station that runs high power and big antennas. Realizing that we could be driving away new contesters by not being able to hear them, we installed a four stack of bi
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00131.html (7,979 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] Field Day is not a contest (score: 1)
Author: <w0eea@sbbco.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 13:31:15 -0600
Field Day entries are handled by the ARRL Contest Robot Received cover sheets and documentation emails are logged at: http://www.arrl.org/contests/claimed/ Pictures and comments are found at: http:/
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-06/msg00274.html (10,999 bytes)

7. [VHFcontesting] Integrity of various methods of confirming contacts. (score: 1)
Author: <w0eea@sbbco.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:44:30 -0600
Hi GangThere were some comments here recently about electronic QSLs. They entirely missed the point. Any QSL method is entirely dependant on the accuracy of the SENDERS of the confirmations and the i
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-07/msg00108.html (8,811 bytes)

8. [VHFcontesting] More contest observations (score: 1)
Author: <w0eea@sbbco.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 07:58:05 -0600
Hi, I just read some interesting comments from a ham out East who is going to give up roving because there are too many fixed stations on the air from formerly rare grids and too many rovers now oper
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-09/msg00050.html (7,852 bytes)

9. Re: [VHFcontesting] QSL's (score: 1)
Author: <w0eea@sbbco.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 11:38:52 -0700
Hi Nate, I sent the message to you via AIM because when I tried to send it to your email address it bounced. I don't know why. (You might try adding me to your approved email list.) Anyway that was
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-12/msg00032.html (6,819 bytes)

10. Re: [VHFcontesting] vhf/uhf activity (score: 1)
Author: <w0eea@sbbco.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 06:40:45 -0700
I run a multiop VHF station in Colorado. We looked at the big unidirectional array in Maine when a program about it was presented at the Central States meeting in Colorado Springs a while back. Havi
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-02/msg00085.html (10,564 bytes)

11. [VHFcontesting] W0EEA June contest plans (score: 1)
Author: <w0eea@sbbco.net>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 19:57:01 -0600
The W0EEA unlimited multi-op station will be active for the ARRL June VHF QSO Party June 9-11, 2007 from our usual location at DM79vh. Bands: ABCD9EFGHIJK We have set up HamIM for rx only unless some
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-05/msg00079.html (7,504 bytes)

12. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS vs. Real-time logging (score: 1)
Author: <w0eea@sbbco.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:44:31 -0600
I regularly make skeds before a contest begins. Also: Multioperator and Single Operator Assisted stations may use spotting nets. I would be absolutely against any change in the rules that would prev
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-08/msg00101.html (7,800 bytes)

13. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS and Contesting (score: 1)
Author: <w0eea@sbbco.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:18:38 -0600
2.1.3 (as well as 2.1) is part of the rules for a Single Operator Station. It has no effect on Rovers or Multi-operator Stations. So Multi-ops can use spotting networks as long as they don't spot th
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-08/msg00110.html (9,111 bytes)

14. [VHFcontesting] More VHF rover rules (score: 1)
Author: <w0eea@sbbco.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:23:46 -0700
Hi, Regarding the new Rover class rules for VHF contests: First a compliment to the ARRL. The new rules, if I am interpreting them correctly are a great improvement over the previous set of rules. I
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-12/msg00081.html (11,359 bytes)

15. Re: [VHFcontesting] 2008 ARRL January VHF Sweepstakes Rules (score: 1)
Author: <w0eea@sbbco.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 07:03:30 -0700
Hi Joe, See section 9.1 of the rules in the link above. The rules for this contest consist of the rules at that link, plus the applicable parts of "General Rules for All ARRL Contests," plus the appl
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-12/msg00103.html (9,162 bytes)

16. Re: [VHFcontesting] Single Operators, Ethics, and 6 Meters (score: 1)
Author: <w0eea@sbbco.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:30:28 -0600
-- Original Message -- Hi, To use Ping Jockey you have to be registered. Your interest, call sign and exchange are part of every message you send and on 'Earwigging' if you don't send anything. Unles
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00273.html (9,404 bytes)

17. Re: [VHFcontesting] missing log grid circling and undocumented rovers (score: 1)
Author: <w0eea@sbbco.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 07:09:19 -0600
How do you reconcile 100 plus QSOs? You don't have to. At the 101st QSO the Rover becomes an Unlimited Rover. The rule reads "A rover may not make more than 100 QSOs with any other one rover." Not t
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00265.html (9,203 bytes)

18. Re: [VHFcontesting] HELP! Looking for stacking info on 1.2GHZ yagis (score: 1)
Author: <w0eea@sbbco.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 18:25:21 -0700
Joe the increase in gain comes from narrowing the beam width. If you stack them vertically the vertical beam width is narrowed. Stack them side by side to narrow the horizontal beam width. Vertical s
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00208.html (8,061 bytes)

19. [VHFcontesting] Rules, opinions, and emails (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Smith" <w0eea@sbbco.net>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 03:51:35 -0600
Someone at the A.R.R.L. apparently believes that everyone who is going to enter any one of their contests is privy to every email and letter they have ever sent explaining, defining, or redefining th
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-05/msg00375.html (12,926 bytes)

20. Re: [VHFcontesting] a new Strategy for home and club stations (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Smith" <w0eea@sbbco.net>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 05:57:36 -0600
Hi James, If you are 'out in the field' you should have a GPS with you. The GPS shows time accurate to well within a second. So do most cell phones. 73, Jim W0EEA ___________________________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-05/msg00519.html (9,244 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu