Mail Archive Search: <+from:w2pm@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:w2pm@aol.com: 320 ]

Total 320 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Follow-Up - RCS-4 & Beverages Project. (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:13:14 EDT; As it turns out I have a a/b remote relay which uses DC signaling on the coax line. However, I noticed significant degradation on the A antenna - 4:1 SWR up from 1:1 before the relay.. I think this i; /archives//html/Topband/2002-10/msg00138.html (7,196 bytes)
2. Topband: Coupling between bev and other antennas (score: 1): Author: w2pm@aol.com (w2pm@aol.com); Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 07:22:25 -0400; Aside from coupling effects there is a serious price to pay when using elevated raised radials - true noise repeaters. 2 of my flags had to moved from over 200 ft away "pointing thru" the radials to; /archives//html/Topband/2002-09/msg00086.html (7,987 bytes)
3. Topband: beverage antennas (score: 1): Author: w2pm@aol.com (w2pm@aol.com); Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 22:52:22 -0400; /archives//html/Topband/2002-08/msg00054.html (7,198 bytes)
4. Topband: 4U1UN and VP9 activity (score: 1): Author: w2pm@aol.com (w2pm@aol.com); Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 11:23:59 -0400; In weekend visits to NYC I stay at the UN Plaza hotel directly across the street and have a great view of the roof and the antennas. Back in April there was a very sickly looking vertical, about 30'; /archives//html/Topband/2002-08/msg00069.html (7,634 bytes)
5. Topband: Discouraging News re 4U1UN (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 22:32:06 -0400; I spoke to a key person here in NY close to the situation and shared the views here re a 4U1UN operation especially on 160. However, as some suspected, internal politics re the ham station and club -; /archives//html/Topband/2002-08/msg00104.html (7,269 bytes)
6. Topband: Ameco PCL-P preamp (score: 1): Author: w2pm@aol.com (w2pm@aol.com); Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 23:28:56 -0400; I use an ICE 135 for 160 and 80 with a half size flag and pennant - which are very low in output and I have found similar results that the preamp does not help when the gain is cranked up. However, i; /archives//html/Topband/2002-07/msg00118.html (7,223 bytes)
7. Topband: Lightning and Beverages (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 09:05:43 EDT; Im wondering if anyone has seen this problem on the Flags and Pennants? Ive been thru several nasty storms here and still the K9AY transformers and my terminating resistors (1/4 watt carbons encased; /archives//html/Topband/2002-04/msg00064.html (8,316 bytes)
8. Topband: TEN-TEC IS LISTENING! (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 16:01:28 EST; I wonder what with all the specialized reflectors re: ham radio and the ready access why marketing people at the rig makers would'nt get a bit of smarts on this before they go on product designs and; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00078.html (8,894 bytes)
9. Topband: TEN-TEC IS LISTENING! (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 03:43:08 +0000; I've been wondering why the makers have long abandoned the slave receiver feature as on the TR4/R4 and S Line combos? The flexibility of two separate receivers coupled with a tight integration of eit; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00086.html (8,129 bytes)
10. Topband: Reactance problem (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 06:21:08 EST; I don't suggest this is the issue here but I have found after extensive work with it that the MFJ259B is quite sensitive to BC band and/or any other "strong RF" coming in off the antenna in question.; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00119.html (8,024 bytes)
11. Topband: Reactance problem (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 06:26:23 EST; Another possible "issue" with the MFJ259B I found (but did not contribute to accuracy)was not so untypical fit and finish issues with MFJ product quality. This is not a flame on them but my objective; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00120.html (8,381 bytes)
12. Topband: Noise and reception (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 07:28:40 EST; David - Re your post on (ill considered)critical comments of various antennas and the need to attract more low band ops, etc. I think what Tom, W8JI often says should be taken into serious considerat; /archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00091.html (9,015 bytes)
13. Topband: Confessions of A Known Criminal (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 13:31:33 +0000; Perhaps a "Gentlemen's Band" and a band which allows contests are not compatible - except for the SP test, a contest is a contest - mostly rude and inconsiderate activity and there is nothing unique; /archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00202.html (7,050 bytes)
14. Topband: Directional Receive Antennas (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 19:12:39 EST; I have been diligently experimenting with receive antennas here in suburban, NOISY, NNJ for several months and have carefully studied the many great posts here as well as ON4UN's book and other sourc; /archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00215.html (9,141 bytes)
15. Topband: Dedicated topband transceiver (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 15:19:26 +0000; I have noticed that the distinct unique pleasures of a topband pileup (vs 20 meters) what with the far more courtious and knowledable operatoring is somewhat offset by the severe amount of keyclicks; /archives//html/Topband/2002-01/msg00094.html (7,254 bytes)
16. Topband: "Noise zone" (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 16:56:17 EST; Reading thru K1ZM's book recently I noticed K2DSV listing as DXCC 44 on 160. Ive known Don Wilson for years but never knew he was a 160 man. I emailed the other day and he mentioned something I never; /archives//html/Topband/2001-11/msg00033.html (6,684 bytes)
17. Topband: Riley is Wrong (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 08:58:48 EDT; Riley's use of Federal enforcement action on a volunteer bandplan is wrong. It will not withstand a legal challenge and can be the basis of undermining the great efforts he has done thusfar (except w; /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00172.html (7,192 bytes)
18. Topband: Beacons or ref. signals for topband? (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2001 12:35:48 EDT; Altho I have been unable to listen since April there has been for many years a French RTTY station on 2065. I was told by several NYC area old timers this is from Paris. Pete Malvasi, W2PM -- FAQ on; /archives//html/Topband/2001-08/msg00018.html (6,949 bytes)
19. Topband: Wideband Noise on 160 (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 11:10:03 EST; Recently I found another unusual wideband noise source for a new ham closeby - his water bed heater - which was in the OFF position! Only pulling it out of the wall outlet solved the problem which wa; /archives//html/Topband/2000-12/msg00155.html (8,074 bytes)
20. Topband: TopBand Receivers (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2000 12:22:51 EDT; I'm just wondering if you ops with the A4's and R4C's are using these in conjunction with your new technology rigs by just remote muting the old receiver? If so isn't it kind of difficult to spot the; /archives//html/Topband/2000-08/msg00066.html (7,852 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]