Mail Archive Search: <+from:w2up@voicenet.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:w2up@voicenet.com: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. N6AA's note (score: 1): Author: w2up@voicenet.com (Barry Kutner); Date: Fri Sep 27 10:01:09 1996; Dick - I'm confused. I've read many notes here on the reflector, and heard K3WW's presentation at Dayton showing that "single op distracted" scores are lower than single-op without packet, most of th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-09/msg00150.html (9,677 bytes)
2. SOA vs SO (score: 1): Author: w2up@voicenet.com (Barry Kutner); Date: Fri Sep 27 15:29:56 1996; One comment I've seen repeated over the years is that the better single-ops don't use packet, while the SOAs are a different class of operator and/or station; hence, the better scores in SO vs SOA. T; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-09/msg00152.html (21,567 bytes)
3. WAE e-mailed logs confirmations? (score: 1): Author: w2up@voicenet.com (Barry Kutner); Date: Thu Oct 10 14:39:46 1996; I sent my WAE SSB logs several weeks ago to the compuserve.com address given, but have received no confirmation of receipt despite inquiries. Has anyone received confirmation of receipt of logs? Tnx/; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-10/msg00071.html (18,917 bytes)
4. RTTY Internet sprINT results (score: 1): Author: w2up@voicenet.com (Barry Kutner); Date: Tue Oct 15 11:35:14 1996; First RTTY Internet sprINT Results W2UP 105 K0RC 94 KF3P 90 WS7I 87 KN6DV 82 K1IU 82 WB5B 80 W7RSJ 61 KB9KWL 59 VE7CFD 41 WA4JQS 37 VE7SOD 21 RA0FU 9 WF1B 5 AB5KD 5 Comments: KF3P: Well, that was int; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-10/msg00099.html (22,786 bytes)
5. Little fish..... (score: 1): Author: w2up@voicenet.com (Barry Kutner); Date: Mon Oct 28 15:16:08 1996; I believe most "big guns" truly are gentleman. Many are on this reflector, and frequently comment and help with their experience and knowledge. The problem, as I see it, is that the "little pistol" o; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-10/msg00181.html (21,892 bytes)
6. Summary - low pass filters (score: 1): Author: w2up@voicenet.com (Barry Kutner); Date: Mon Nov 11 14:32:03 1996; Got a good number of replies to my inquiry. The overwhelming majority felt a LP filter still should be used, even if the neighborhood is CATV-ized. Regarding choice of LP filters, the ICE filter won; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-11/msg00173.html (12,368 bytes)
7. SO 2 radio backlash? (score: 1): Author: w2up@voicenet.com (Barry Kutner); Date: Mon Nov 18 11:22:36 1996; Over the years, I've heard stories about "arrangements" made so that one doesn't have to leave the operating position when nature calls. Anyone have further info or experience? 73 Barry P.S. I try t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-11/msg00248.html (8,219 bytes)
8. Two More SS Jammming Incidents (score: 1): Author: w2up@voicenet.com (Barry Kutner); Date: Wed Nov 20 16:48:52 1996; Perhaps 160 is NOT the "Gentlemen's Band" Whoever still calls it that is living in the past. I think 160 should be called the "let's all call the DX from the packet spot whether we hear him or not" b; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-11/msg00296.html (11,140 bytes)
9. Logging dupes and sponsor log checking (score: 1): Author: w2up@voicenet.com (Barry Kutner); Date: Mon Dec 9 10:57:42 1996; I agree, Rich. In CQWW CW I called 8R1K on one band and was told "QSO before." Took about 90 seconds for me to convince him he wasn't in my log. What a waste of time for both of us! I had about 70 du; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-12/msg00091.html (9,308 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]