Mail Archive Search: <+from:w2wg@comcast.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:w2wg@comcast.net: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: T - vertical improvement (score: 1): Author: "Robert Carroll" <w2wg@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:17:41 -0400; I have often done this, but N4GG educated me on another aspect of the old micas. While they usually carry a voltage rating, they normally do not carry a current rating. I never worried about this unt; /archives//html/Topband/2009-07/msg00116.html (12,655 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: "return" current - what is it? (score: 1): Author: "Robert Carroll" <w2wg@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 11:45:41 -0400; Knowing both Tom and Yuri to be two of the best and brightest, I am sure this is going to be an interesting discussion, and only the devil is making me stir the pot a little in an impractical way. Ki; /archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00120.html (12,853 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: LU5OM shortened dipole (inverted vee) doing a nice job (score: 1): Author: w2wg@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:40:33 +0000 (UTC); Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App --Original Message-- Hi folks Let me add some comments on Gary and Bruce savvy remarks. The real question is "how many antennas you have for 160m?" Using Manuel e; /archives//html/Topband/2017-07/msg00048.html (14,775 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: DX Engineering final field test of the 3Y0Z Bouvet 160 metres vertical (score: 1): Author: w2wg@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 20:54:45 +0000 (UTC); Sentiment from XFINITY Connect Mobile App --Original Message--_-thefirsttotototo The DX Engineering and Bouvet Island teams have worked together to design an efficient 90 foot top loaded 160 meter ve; /archives//html/Topband/2017-08/msg00069.html (8,329 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]