Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w4atl@shermanbanks.net: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer - Proposal & Compromise (score: 1)
Author: "Sherman Banks" <w4atl@shermanbanks.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 13:51:55 -0400
So as I understand it a computer can encode CW but is banned from decoding it. Where is the line drawn with calling CQ? If we are consistent, then the computer should be banned from encoding and deco
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00117.html (7,763 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge (score: 1)
Author: "Sherman Banks" <w4atl@shermanbanks.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:18:00 -0400
I think what we (the not so smart people according to VE4XT), are looking for is consistency in the arguments. Packet spotting was banned for SO because other operators are feeding the SO with inform
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00241.html (11,178 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu