Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w4nti: 723 ] [ at (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ mindspring.com: 1467 ]

Total 499 documents matching your query.

21. [SECC] Clicks in the loop (score: 67)
Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel Jeswald)
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 20:03:41 -0600
I think you have figured it out. It is very likely a electric fence charging system. W1RFI at ARRL could help I think. Dan/W4NTI (40 - 50hz) that is picked up by a K9AY loop? The noise is more pronou
/archives//html/SECC/2006-12/msg00003.html (7,528 bytes)

22. [SECC] 160 meter ARRL (score: 67)
Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel Jeswald)
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:18:46 -0600
Since the ALABAMA Contest Group is still not "approved" at ARRL I changed my submission to the SECC. It ain't much, but hope it helps. Dan/W4NTI ARRL 160-Meter Contest Call: W4NTI Operator(s): W4NTI
/archives//html/SECC/2006-12/msg00034.html (6,679 bytes)

23. [SECC] Claimed Scores, Last Weekend's Contests (score: 67)
Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel Jeswald)
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 18:29:29 -0600
You got that right....SECC was very well representated this time around. Dan/W4NTI in
/archives//html/SECC/2006-12/msg00036.html (8,119 bytes)

24. [SECC] no code license (score: 67)
Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel Jeswald)
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:32:21 -0600
Great idea, wonderful plan. However I think youv'e been down under too long. Stateside acting like good hams with a give away license? I have my doubts. But your right, something needs to be done. My
/archives//html/SECC/2006-12/msg00075.html (9,650 bytes)

25. [SECC] For the Advancement of Amateur Radio (score: 67)
Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel Jeswald)
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:04:07 -0600
ARRL never supported NO CODE. In fact they requested FCC to KEEP some CW, at LEAST the 5WPM for the Extra. And prior to that they NEVER asked for such a large expansion of the 80 meter phone band. An
/archives//html/SECC/2006-12/msg00077.html (8,328 bytes)

26. [SECC] SKN (score: 67)
Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel Jeswald)
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:27:52 -0600
For the purest SKN is Straight Key Night, which means the proverbial Hand Key, the Pump, etc. But I'm glad to see bugs being "allowed". My 60 year old fist and Uncle Arthur makes it real rough with a
/archives//html/SECC/2006-12/msg00095.html (7,641 bytes)

27. [SECC] SKN (score: 67)
Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel Jeswald)
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 19:23:49 -0600
Thanks Tommy, That makes me feel better, now what did I do with that cane? Merry and a Happy Dan/W4NTI easier.
/archives//html/SECC/2006-12/msg00097.html (9,370 bytes)

28. [SECC] FW: SS CW W4NTI Single Op LP (score: 71)
Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel Jeswald)
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 17:02:51 -0600
I have decided to submit under the SECC for this one since youse guys are still going for that gavel. Hope it helps some. I was going for the sweep and didn't push too hard for Q's. Dan/W4NTI Alabama
/archives//html/SECC/2006-11/msg00016.html (7,764 bytes)

29. [SECC] re CWSS - Close Scores! (score: 67)
Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel Jeswald)
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 16:59:30 -0600
Congratulations on the sweep. And I DID submit for SECC. Not a high score, but it may help. I was going for a sweep and I got it. The ACG is not yet got the paperwork in, so I expect some more entrie
/archives//html/SECC/2006-11/msg00026.html (8,070 bytes)

30. [SECC] Winning SS (score: 67)
Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 15:00:50 -0500
I think all things considered, i.e. location, sunspot cycle, etc....that 40 and 20 will be about it this year. 40 should really' be outstanding IF we have room to do CW in. 160 has a major problem wi
/archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00004.html (8,538 bytes)

31. [SECC] More in common than different (score: 67)
Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 15:07:13 -0500
About all I managed to get up this year was a 75/80 meter crossed dipole deal. I just cut two inverted V's, one high and one low and I get a great SWR of 1.5 very low and 1.5 very high. Thus I can do
/archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00005.html (8,940 bytes)

32. [SECC] Public Apology (score: 67)
Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:08:04 -0500
Accepted Dan/W4NTI
/archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00028.html (7,067 bytes)

33. [SECC] 160 M Cross the Pond Beacon Experiment (score: 67)
Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 19:15:20 -0500
Here is the copy of the 160 Experiment for those that don't take the ARRL bulletins. I was NOT aware of the time involved when this original happened happened. I'm not a 160 expert by any means, but
/archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00039.html (10,804 bytes)

34. [SECC] Alabama Contest Group and SECC Club Circle (score: 67)
Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:17:17 -0500
Me too. I'm physically handicapped and have a lot of trouble sitting and operating any length of time. Guess I'm dead wood too. And of course being in Alabama, I don't contribute anything of value. D
/archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00064.html (9,323 bytes)

35. [SECC] Club procedures (score: 67)
Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 18:55:06 -0500
Which is WHY I JOINED in the first place. Dan/W4NTI Part of the insignificant Alabama contingent.
/archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00074.html (7,432 bytes)

36. [SECC] 80 meters (score: 67)
Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 17:10:52 -0500
The Canadians are going to less then thrilled when the "bubbas" move into "their space". I haven't operated that far down in the band on phone since I was in Germany. Gonna be like old times in the 7
/archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00109.html (7,502 bytes)

37. [SECC] 80 meters (score: 67)
Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:57:36 -0500
I think a LOT of you guys out there remember when twenty meters was moved from 14.2 to 14.150....back in the 80s as I recall. I was on that particular time and the South Americans went nuts yelling w
/archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00116.html (8,303 bytes)

38. [SECC] [ACG] Pa QSO Party Log Format (score: 67)
Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 20:12:44 -0500
They accepted my N3FJP log and it was in the .log .sum .dup format. Dan/W4NTI
/archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00124.html (7,549 bytes)

39. [SECC] [ACG] Request for Comments to CQWW Contest Committee About Catgories of Stations Participating in Real Time Scoreboards (score: 67)
Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:36:30 -0500
IMHO if you use PACKET or TELNET DX CLUSTER you are ASSISTED. PERIOD. Dan/W4NTI
/archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00151.html (8,609 bytes)

40. [SECC] TI8M Again (score: 67)
Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:42:54 -0500
You guys always have a good signal up here in Bama. Heck....it's supposed to be for FUN, right? See you in the pileups. Dan/W4NTI
/archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00152.html (7,292 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu