Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w8ji@w8ji.com: 132 ]

Total 132 documents matching your query.

41. [CQ-Contest] Solution (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 08:22:45 -0400
Start an official observer program with trained people using good equipment properly to monitor, and deduct points for wide signals when more than three agree the signal is too wide. ________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00208.html (10,244 bytes)

42. [CQ-Contest] Multiple direction antennas on one radio...why? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:30:48 -0400
This has my curiousity.....does anyone know what stations doing this really do? When I have a splitter, power divides from the exciter. Each amp has fixed gain. If I have one 10 dB gain amp and a 100
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00239.html (9,731 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] Multiple direction antennas on one radio..summary (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:31:03 -0400
It looks like this is a popular thing to do. I was considering it myself using the DX Engineering stacking system because one system could be adapted to do power ratio division between antennas prett
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00262.html (11,627 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] Multiple direction antennas on one radio...why? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:52:09 -0400
They would automatically crank back and up with an exciter into a splitter. Do a two-way, and each amp probably gets -3.5 dB drive. Do a 4 way, and it is -6.5 or so per amp. Do a 3-way, and it is ei
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00264.html (11,468 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] Plesant change / multiple antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:33:08 -0400
Bob, It's better to either match things closely and tune a marginal amp properly, or seriously over-couple the amp to reduce efficiency and use a much larger amp than required (then you have one pow
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00290.html (8,400 bytes)

46. [CQ-Contest] The real problem (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 09:55:23 -0400
The real problems we now have, that no one seems to want to worry about, are skimmers and remote receivers. All my work with receiving antennas and finding a good low noise location, and all I really
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00316.html (7,957 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] BOGUS RATES: Pot calling the kettle black? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 07:45:57 -0500
There is NO rule you have to give the other fellow's callsign. That went away years ago, I think around the 1980's. The rule is you have to give YOUR OWN callsign either at least once every ten minu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00120.html (8,642 bytes)

48. Re: [CQ-Contest] High-speed CW (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:17:06 -0500
I also do not remember the date of my first license, >> I remember the first date that gave me full privileges, but not my first license date. _______________________________________________ CQ-Conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00251.html (8,284 bytes)

49. Re: [CQ-Contest] First License (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 16:41:58 -0500
I like low bands because of my start. I had to drag radios and TV sets home from the dump and gut them for parts to build Ham gear, including receivers. My first transmitter was on aluminum foil lin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00266.html (8,206 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] reverse beacon network (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 12:26:37 -0500
It isn't just the antenna. It is every radio aspect of the location, antenna, and equipment that determines the S/N ratio. Then, on top of that, there is propagation. Even if antennas were identical
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00401.html (7,818 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] Correctly measuring coaxial phasing lines with an MFJ269 (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 20:50:58 -0500
Well I think I can guess at this. :-) Read the 269 Manual, unless someone removed it or modified it, it should be there. Someone did rewrite the manuals and mess things up, but they should be back ag
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00079.html (10,006 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] Echoes (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 09:48:29 -0500
Years ago on 20 meters before packet and stuff, when I wanted to find out if the band was open, I'd pop my microphone PTT button and listen for the return click. ____________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00151.html (7,890 bytes)

53. Re: [CQ-Contest] Receiving Antenna Splitter and Switching SystemQuestion (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:01:17 -0500
I use this system: http://www.w8ji.com/images/New%20Contest%20Room/Contest%20station%20CQWW2007/receiver-switch-matrix.jpg Except now I have PC boards laid out....the PC boards I have are cascadable,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00215.html (10,321 bytes)

54. Re: [CQ-Contest] EDZ (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:17:02 -0500
Carol, Don't use a 4:1 balun. The impedance presented by the feedline to the balun is not likely to be close to 200 ohms j0, and a 1:1 current balun always does a better job with mismatched loads fo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-01/msg00104.html (8,687 bytes)

55. [CQ-Contest] Skimmer spots (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 22:07:10 -0500
Help!!! Is there any way to stop the stream of spots from skimmers? They just ruin watching the packet cluster for DX! All I see is a constat steady stream of spots from every skimmer in the world! D
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-02/msg00020.html (6,752 bytes)

56. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer spots (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 05:36:55 -0500
Here is the answer I was looking for, thanks to Jim. I searched on line for the answer, and could not find it anywhere: _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-02/msg00023.html (7,763 bytes)

57. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer spots (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:23:35 -0500
I only use VE7CC as a rule, so it worked fine. It is a little strange that Internet searches, and search through the VE7CC pages, did not turn up such a simple answer!! It's back the way I like it n
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-02/msg00027.html (8,325 bytes)

58. Re: [CQ-Contest] How close is too close? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 11:56:20 -0500
Probably the MP. There is an unmodified 1000MP south of me, and I can't operate within 2 kHz of him even when he is barefoot. Some people are fine 300 Hz or 400 Hz away. Some people, even though bar
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-02/msg00181.html (10,008 bytes)

59. Re: [CQ-Contest] PTT inhibit (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 15:43:10 -0500
With the Winkeyer, you can use the PTT lines. MFJ makes a CW keyer, the 495, than can be manually keyed and has programmable keying delay. DX Engineering has a sequencer that passes through PTT lines
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-02/msg00185.html (11,005 bytes)

60. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer had finally arrived (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:03:12 -0500
Thanks Jeff. We will all do that from now on. :-) _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-02/msg00210.html (9,285 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu