Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w9ac@arrl.net: 361 ]

Total 361 documents matching your query.

121. [TenTec] Orion commentary (score: 1)
Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 09:33:45 -0500
A most excellent response Scott and on behalf of the entire Ten-Tec community, thank you for staying tuned to your customers. This is the exactly the kind of factory dialog that will assist in dispel
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00554.html (16,540 bytes)

122. [TenTec] Orion power output (score: 1)
Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 07:11:13 -0500
The 1 dB single-tone acoustical differential is 1) a measurement of Sound Pressure Level (SPL) by the ear and is not referenced to R.F. level, and 2) is only approximate and is a function of audio f
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00746.html (8,827 bytes)

123. [TenTec] RE: More About Clix (score: 1)
Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 07:24:06 -0500
The operative word here is "reasonable." Al, I don't disagree with your statement in the least, but for most of us, securing a vector signal analyzer simply isn't an option for our measurements. -Pau
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00014.html (9,521 bytes)

124. [TenTec] RE: More About Clix (score: 1)
Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 15:27:19 -0500
In theory, I believe that some of the sound card analysis programs can work, but I'm not sure if they sample fast enough to detect the change in pitch...although we're probably speaking of less than
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00029.html (14,796 bytes)

125. [TenTec] OMNI VI "click/chirp" (score: 1)
Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 12:01:26 -0500
Solutions to better Omni Six keying, including establishing the proper timing to external, non-Ten-Tec amplifiers can be found in the Ten-Tec Reflector archives. Most notably, you will find extensive
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00282.html (10,899 bytes)

126. [TenTec] Digital Speech Processing & Pegasus (score: 1)
Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 15:09:59 -0500
Professional broadcast engineers have been using similar techniques for more than twenty years, beginning with devices like the Dorrough DAP310, Inovonics 230/231-MAP-II, and later with Orban's line
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00315.html (10,379 bytes)

127. Re: [TenTec] Verbal agreements, etc. (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 21:39:42 -0400
the amplifier > and asking for my mailing address and preferred method of shipment. A few points worth mentioning: generally, contract law is state-specific -- particularly when the sale of goods ar
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00650.html (11,509 bytes)

128. Re: [TenTec] Triton 540 (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 11:27:17 -0400
I replaced the T/R relay in my Triton 540 with a high-voltage NPN transistor. I believe it is a 2N5551. The collector is open to the T/R line in the event I want to use an external amp. The transisto
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-09/msg00215.html (8,767 bytes)

129. Re: [TenTec] Pegasus relay problems (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 09:46:57 -0400
FWIW - I've had three separate Pegasus rigs in here during the past four years and have never had a single problem with any of them. -Paul, W9AC my one It ____________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00284.html (7,817 bytes)

130. Re: [TenTec] Jorge: 6+ / Acom 1000 (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 10:12:26 -0400
I ran a pair of ACOM amps with my Omni Six back in 1999 and the ACOM is more than fast enough to keep up with the Omni, even without using the bi-directional keying loop. -Paul, W9AC ________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00345.html (8,628 bytes)

131. Re: [TenTec] Inrad 2.8K mod (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:45:39 -0500
2.8KHz Sort of... Originally, the INRAD 2.8 kHz filter for the 9 MHz I.F. slot was designed to widen the transmit passband to allow the CW carrier offset to rest sell within the filter passband and
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00908.html (7,628 bytes)

132. Re: [TenTec] FW: [Icom] RE: Icom Japan IC-7800 announcement (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 07:17:48 -0500
"If you do not want your remarks to be repeated, then don't make them." Really? This isn't a matter of copyright law or internet security. But it is a matter of common-courtesy and decency. He simply
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00598.html (19,427 bytes)

133. [TenTec] FS: Omni Six - Option 3 DSP (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:01:16 -0500
For Sale: Omni Six modified to "Plus" with factory option 3 upgrade. Beautiful condition - a solid "10" with no visible marks, wear or blemishes. Facts about this Omni Six: - Full output on all bands
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00343.html (8,377 bytes)

134. [TenTec] Re: Ten-tec Triton IV (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:13:01 -0500
For Sale: Late Ten-Tec analog Triton IV - ("Model 540" on front panel"). A solid "9" on a 0-10 scale, in very nice condition. With CW filter and N4LQ pure sine-wave sidetone mod. Non-invasive mod for
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00344.html (7,270 bytes)

135. Re: [TenTec] Orion Expanded Test Report (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:48:16 -0500
This may be yesterday's news, but I see that Elecraft has posted the Orion on its rig comparison page. Not surprisingly, they continue to show the K2 on top and even show the Orion's IP2 numbers in t
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00410.html (8,408 bytes)

136. Re: [TenTec] Re: K2 beats Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 07:34:52 -0500
Anyone know if the League has documented and disclosed its step-by-step Product Review testing methods and procedures? Specifically, is each measuring instrument calibrated against a traceable standa
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00468.html (8,732 bytes)

137. Re: [TenTec] Re: K2 beats Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 08:00:44 -0500
Anyone know if the League has documented and disclosed its step-by-step Product Review testing methods and procedures? Specifically, is each measuring instrument calibrated against a traceable standa
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00470.html (7,254 bytes)

138. Re: [TenTec] Re: K2 beats Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 10:47:13 -0500
Thanks Cliff, I just read the ARRL's Test Procedures Manual and while detail is provided with respect to individual procedures, as far as I can see, the document does not address equipment calibratio
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00479.html (10,172 bytes)

139. Re: [TenTec] Re: K2 beats Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 12:24:29 -0500
Agreed. It would be interesting to run performance tests on a sample of ten Orions and ten K2's from different builders and compare performance consistency across units. This may actually be more im
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00487.html (9,177 bytes)

140. Re: [TenTec] Here We Go Again (was Spectrum Hogs) (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 09:26:04 -0500
Exactly Barry. There is such limited use of Hi-Fi SSB at the moment, yet some folks just cannot pass up a opportunity to perpetuate controversy. The issue is not, and has never been, a real issue exc
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00698.html (8,753 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu