Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w9sz@prairienet.org: 586 ]

Total 586 documents matching your query.

281. [CQ-Contest] Left Coast Logs of the Future? (score: 1)
Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup)
Date: Wed Jul 31 23:40:23 2002
I guess that could be true. If you really want to prevent someone from doing something while still giving the apparency that you want them to do it, you can come up with all sorts of methods. It is a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00008.html (7,826 bytes)

282. [CQ-Contest] CW or SSB FCC says neither. (score: 1)
Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup)
Date: Fri Jul 19 00:06:50 2002
I dunno - it's still a hobby to me. I do it for fun. I've been doing CW for 35 years because I'm good at it and I think it's fun. I work with a guy who does Highland games. On some weekends they dres
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00247.html (8,453 bytes)

283. [CQ-Contest] Clarification CW, SSB and the FCC (score: 1)
Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup)
Date: Sun Jul 21 12:58:50 2002
I have been active on RTTY, PSK31, MFSK16, Hellschreiber, etc. and I really don't see any difference in what is actually done with any of these modes. Some are wider in spectrum, some are narrower, s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00304.html (8,708 bytes)

284. [CQ-Contest] Follow The Money (score: 1)
Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup)
Date: Mon Jul 22 23:56:03 2002
That's pretty much the case around here. There are a few people who get on and ragchew on 144 MHz SSB but the higher bands are pretty empty except for contests. We just got a group going in this area
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00320.html (10,284 bytes)

285. [CQ-Contest] ARRL report on line scores decision (score: 1)
Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup)
Date: Tue Jul 23 12:06:41 2002
All the "good stuff" (for the technically-minded) is in QEX these days. The last issue I got, which had articles on software-defined radio, was superb. And then there's NCJ. QST doesn't appeal to me
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00333.html (8,748 bytes)

286. [CQ-Contest] removing FD residue (score: 1)
Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup)
Date: Tue Jul 23 14:33:13 2002
On the Microchip PIC microcontroller application notes website is an idea for a novel mosquito repeller. It simply produces a very quiet duplication of the sound of a dragonfly's wings. The dragonfly
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00350.html (7,944 bytes)

287. [CQ-Contest] Re: QST Line Scores (score: 1)
Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup)
Date: Fri Jul 26 09:40:24 2002
Yes, but can they string up a 40 meter dipole? Solder parts onto a PC poard? (I won't even say surface-mount IC's.) Replace a water pump on an Intrepid? (I replaced a water pump on a 1963 Chevy when
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00447.html (9,777 bytes)

288. [CQ-Contest] Re: QST Line Scores (score: 1)
Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup)
Date: Fri Jul 26 12:17:04 2002
Yes, it sure is easier to locate them on the web than in other places. I haven't even looked at any of the local magazine stands in years, so I don't know if QST or CQ or any ham radio mags are there
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00456.html (9,909 bytes)

289. [CQ-Contest] CW or SSB FCC says neither. (score: 1)
Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup)
Date: Mon Aug 5 09:49:07 2002
The new digital modes are far superior to CW or SSB in being able to copy weak signals. But they take more time to make a QSO. If you're trying to compare rates, that is a factor. Just like a view ca
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-08/msg00049.html (9,330 bytes)

290. [CQ-Contest] CW or SSB FCC says neither. (score: 1)
Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup)
Date: Mon Aug 5 18:59:22 2002
Digipan allows you to copy 2 PSK31 signals at once. W1SQLPSK allows you to copy up to 20 (yes, twenty!) PSK31 signals at once. None, however, allow you to transmit more than one signal at once. I'm n
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-08/msg00058.html (7,762 bytes)

291. [CQ-Contest] but are YOU really (score: 1)
Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup)
Date: Tue Aug 6 09:40:07 2002
The operator still has to read the signal on the screen. The operator still has to reply with his answers. To me, the operator is still copying the signals - he's using his eyes instead of his ears.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-08/msg00072.html (10,247 bytes)

292. [CQ-Contest] Flags wanted.. (score: 1)
Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup)
Date: Mon Aug 26 23:43:07 2002
Most of the islands you've listed are owned by other countries and would fly the flag of the parent country. The CIA World Fact Book might be a good place to look. Zack W9SZ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-08/msg00266.html (6,668 bytes)

293. [CQ-Contest] Re: ts-850 (score: 1)
Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup)
Date: Fri Aug 30 11:18:22 2002
Many contesters and DXers have recommended the TS-850 to me as one of the best deals in its price range, so I bought one a couple months ago. I've been more than happy with it so far. The receiver is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-08/msg00331.html (8,605 bytes)

294. [CQ-Contest] Re "No QSL Needed" (score: 1)
Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup)
Date: Fri Oct 11 11:33:22 2002
How about QDQ "Don't QSL"? Zack W9SZ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00102.html (7,843 bytes)

295. [CQ-Contest] Packet Spots in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup)
Date: Tue Oct 29 07:52:50 2002
Curious ... Curiouser and curiouser ... And the beat goes on ... If that was some sort of a weird yet honest mistake, it could be overlooked as one of the many technological glitches present in the m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00219.html (9,193 bytes)

296. [CQ-Contest] Out of Band operating (score: 1)
Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup)
Date: Thu Oct 31 10:36:02 2002
I think a little leniency should be granted when someone uses the wrong VFO. I've done it when operating the graveyard shifts in a contest and with very little sleep in the early morning hours couldn
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00289.html (8,863 bytes)

297. [CQ-Contest] SS CW thoughts (score: 1)
Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup)
Date: Thu Oct 31 10:39:59 2002
It's always April 1st for Dr. Bafoofnik! Zack W9SZ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00290.html (8,325 bytes)

298. [CQ-Contest] Out of Band operating (score: 1)
Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup)
Date: Thu Oct 31 13:54:14 2002
I have never seen this figure written anywhere. I have worked many DX stations up about 0.7 kHz from the bottom of the CW band. This should be adequate if you're not sending at 200 wpm! 100 Hz is a l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00304.html (9,413 bytes)

299. Re: [CQ-Contest] Longest Callsign Possible? (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:09:40 -0500 (CDT)
Heehee - under week signal conditions that would be verrry interesting! I had enough trouble just getting "EN61gq" across on CW in the 10 GHz contest yesterday. :-] 73, Zack W9SZ ____________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00204.html (9,377 bytes)

300. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Logs Needed (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 08:52:51 -0500 (CDT)
That's pretty neat! Is this to be a real-time thing that displays stations worked as you work them? I have some other questions but maybe I should wait until you give more details of what it is and w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00127.html (8,279 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu