Mail Archive Search: <+from:wa4tt@nlamerica.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:wa4tt@nlamerica.com: 58 ]

Total 58 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Amps] transformers (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 18:10:26 -0400; Meant to type: 1/2 Kw in. sri _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00456.html (8,068 bytes)
22. Re: [Amps] transformers (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 19:54:23 -0400; How could these amps produce such output, if they I believe what they're designed to do-- and what they will actually do are entirely different. Kind'a like Man being designed for one YL but some can; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00463.html (8,466 bytes)
23. Re: [Amps] transformers (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:19:43 -0400; Also, don't forget the feed thru from the driver needs to be deducted. / TT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/l; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00508.html (9,702 bytes)
24. Re: [Amps] transformers (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:35:25 -0400; Why no-- you shoulda seen how hard it was when trying to measure brilliance in that string of 300w light bulbs ! :>) _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00510.html (9,757 bytes)
25. Re: [Amps] transformers (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 12:39:41 -0400; As Rich asked, I was joking, realizing average stations aren't equiped for accurate measures. But since the discussion has gotten to --Max output from a SB220 -- then all measurement tolerances shoul; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00523.html (9,611 bytes)
26. Re: [Amps] AMPS (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 21:26:23 -0400; Joe answers: I was preparing to order the Herring, someone mentioned earlier, for dinner. But the awful stench of rotting "Mullet" blowing in from the West Coast has me thinking steak and potatoe in; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00825.html (10,088 bytes)
27. Re: [Amps] 572B grid (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 14:14:55 -0400; Wish I had seen this in '64. I could've raised the screen & plate v on the exciter. Then used my $ on something besides putting 6146's in my HT 37! :>) That old phasing rig would have really done som; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00955.html (8,854 bytes)
28. [Amps] Fw: "Tubes 201" - How Vacuum Tubes Really Work (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:33:02 -0400; Will; Anytime I become less negative, I become more positive. And I'm VERY POSITIVE you should go back and read Richs free advice to you in his post of 7-20-06 sent at 9:47 PM. You're starting to "Fl; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01052.html (7,357 bytes)
29. Re: [Amps] Tube 201 (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 23:16:05 -0400; Didn't really pertain to that paragraph, just the thread in general. From 3-500s, 811, and on down to 6v6s. Plus I knew you were a fan of the senator from Mass. :>) I have 3 or 4 editions-- I think; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01061.html (8,452 bytes)
30. Re: [Amps] Fw: "Tubes 201" - How Vacuum Tubes Really Work (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:00:54 -0400; Mr Rauch, The above link to Giocoletto's text seems to be broken. Maybe something missing on the end of URL . The other links worked fine. I appreciate the time you and others devote to providing fac; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01079.html (8,699 bytes)
31. Re: [Amps] Weak Amperex 3-500Z (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 11:32:08 -0400; On a similar note I have an Eimac -500z with a hole sucked in the side (approx .22 cal). If I can successfully remove the white powder thats now coating the inside, anyone have a suggestion for an ep; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01238.html (7,490 bytes)
32. Re: [Amps] plexiglas isolation in coils (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:42:36 -0400; Someone from Starkville must have contaminated Bobs cornflakes. Not the first time he's "nutted up" on Ameritron. I have an AL1200 changed to a 1500 (cuz I have spares if ever needed) no problems.Has; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01252.html (9,811 bytes)
33. Re: [Amps] plexiglas isolation in coils (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:21:13 -0400; I also meant to mention. Someone a while back asked about building his first amp using 813s. Homebrewing with the old radiationed cooled tubes is a good way to not have the noise problem. But the aud; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01253.html (9,965 bytes)
34. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 21:22:26 -0400; Heck Bill, They're Japanese, I'm just proud it's written in English. As politically correct as this country has become, its a wonder we get that much. /TT ____________________________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01338.html (9,463 bytes)
35. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 22:09:52 -0400; "Attention to detail" would include having a native English speaker proofread. I stand by my comment. Bill, W6WRT I'm just a "dirt road country boy", but I'm smart enough to know what they're talkin; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01343.html (9,747 bytes)
36. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 22:31:29 -0400; Yes, I've already been thru a good portion of it. And another lesson I've learned is change always starts from the bottom-- I've never asked for a "new deal" if I'm holding a Full House. Thats true--; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01347.html (10,199 bytes)
37. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 22:43:46 -0400; -- Original Message -- From: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net> John, About all the websites I've visited that were Japanese or Chinese have mis-spelled words where they try to translate to english.; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01349.html (9,928 bytes)
38. Re: [Amps] Grid Vs cathode drive (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:48:56 -0400; I remember when anything below 100w WAS considered QRP. /TT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00099.html (8,012 bytes)
39. Re: [Amps] Grid Vs cathode drive (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 13:15:18 -0400; Bill, Thats certainly true. A major portion of the new hams I knew in the late 50's early 60s got on with homebrew rigs. Single tube oscillators etc. BUT, below 100w was considered QRP. My 6L6 osc a; /archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00189.html (10,636 bytes)
40. Re: [Amps] Grid Vs cathode drive (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 13:33:12 -0400; I also meant to add-- in that day, most of us didn't want to belong to that "Club". We dreamed of 813s, 4-250s, and heaven forbid if we ever got hold of a 4-1000. QRP is fun-- last few years I've bee; /archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00191.html (10,034 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]