- 1. Topband: Inverted V shaped like a W (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Miller WB5OXQ in Waco" <wb5oxq@grandecom.net>
- Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 22:27:24 -0600
- I wonder how messed up an antenna for 160 would be if the center was supported at 55' and the legs had to be bent like a letter W in order to get the required length for 1/2 wave at 1.9 mhz. The ends
- /archives//html/Topband/2007-11/msg00026.html (6,678 bytes)
- 2. Topband: Inverted L or 1/4 wave sloper? (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Miller WB5OXQ in Waco" <wb5oxq@grandecom.net>
- Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 18:49:37 -0600
- I have a 50' tower with a tribander on top with which to support an inverted L or a 1/4 wave sloper. The beam is about 53' so the high end at 50' and the low end anywhere from 30' to a lowest of 6' T
- /archives//html/Topband/2007-11/msg00199.html (6,803 bytes)
- 3. Topband: gamma match a tower (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Miller WB5OXQ in Waco" <wb5oxq@grandecom.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:02:12 -0600
- I have a 50' tower with a tribander on top with which to support an inverted L or a 1/4 wave sloper. .... Actually the tower is 52' with a force 12 c3 trapless tribander at the top and another 10' of
- /archives//html/Topband/2007-11/msg00215.html (7,822 bytes)
- 4. Topband: Nobody can hear me (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Miller WB5OXQ in Waco" <wb5oxq@grandecom.net>
- Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 13:26:11 -0600
- I have not had time to build a new antenna for 160 so I tried the DX sloper. I could hear pretty well with several stations over S9 so I tried throwing my call in a couple of times at 100 watts and g
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-01/msg00242.html (7,324 bytes)
- 5. Topband: Re; no one can hear me (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Miller WB5OXQ in Waco" <wb5oxq@grandecom.net>
- Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:49:37 -0600
- Last night I got on 1889 and worked 2 Texas stations who reported I am getting out just fine on the band. Both reported hearing my over S9. They also helped me with a mic connector problem and a TX e
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-01/msg00274.html (6,965 bytes)
- 6. Topband: My 160m antenna (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Miller WB5OXQ in Waco" <wb5oxq@grandecom.net>
- Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 12:16:51 -0600
- I am currently using a alpha delta twin sloper for 160-80-40m. With a lot of tinkering I have made it work fairly well on 160 and it is amazingly broadband. The 160m wire has a coil in its midpoint w
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-02/msg00088.html (7,737 bytes)
- 7. Re: Topband: Fwd: Re: My 160m antenna (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Miller WB5OXQ in Waco" <wb5oxq@grandecom.net>
- Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:28:52 -0600
- Thanks for a couple of suggestions so far. I am getting 20 over reports on the great lakes area from my QTH in Texas so my main problem is reception. I thought more signal capture area could help the
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-02/msg00092.html (8,304 bytes)
- 8. Re: Topband: No doubt about it (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim WB5OXQ inb Waco, TX" <wb5oxq@grandecom.net>
- Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:08:41 -0600
- I was always under the impression that RST signals were created for CW not phone use. S meter readings are not very meaningful either since everybodys s meter reads different. Comments like strong si
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00125.html (7,675 bytes)
- 9. Topband: email change (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim and Ella" <wb5oxq@grandecom.net>
- Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 15:21:32 -0600
- Please change my email address from wb5oxq@ to wb5oxq_1@grandecom.net _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
- /archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00059.html (6,545 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu