Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wc1m@msn.com: 276 ]

Total 276 documents matching your query.

161. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR problem-update from the front lines (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:03:18 -0400
Once again, we're back to the power supply. I guess I have to agree with Jerry that before taking the antenna down you should try a power supply with more current capacity or a big cap on the SteppIR
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00598.html (24,608 bytes)

162. Re: [TowerTalk] Correct placement and use of Chicago Grips? (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:20:11 -0400
The procedure is pretty straightforward and the parts don't interfere with each other as much as you might think. I use five-hole equalizer plates that are welded to the anchor rods. The extra holes
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00897.html (12,127 bytes)

163. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower design question (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:25:30 -0400
Never heard that story! Remind me not to climb that tower... Yet another reason to use a pier-pin base -- you can't install the first section upside down! 73, Dick WC1M ______________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00898.html (10,583 bytes)

164. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 13:34:17 -0400
I don't want to get in the middle of this, but I just ran EZNEC models comparing the 4-el SteppIR and Force-12 EF-420 on 20m at 96'. The SteppIR boom is 32'; the EF-420 boom is 30' (and presumably op
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00908.html (13,458 bytes)

165. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 10:45:37 -0400
_______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00011.html (15,093 bytes)

166. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 12:38:30 -0400
Yeah, I think there's something wrong with the F/B in my models. I'm looking into it. The figures I posted included ground gain. The forward gain of 14.36 for SteppIR and 14.29 for Force12 are about
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00015.html (17,261 bytes)

167. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacked Steppirs (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 10:19:18 -0400
I've had a single 4-el SteppIR for about 2 1/2 years and I'm in the process of building a 3-stack of 4-el SteppIRs. I'm familiar with the control box design but haven't actually done what you're sugg
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00061.html (10,167 bytes)

168. Re: [TowerTalk] Trylon safety rail system (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 10:39:53 -0400
Even more limited when you have three TIC rings in the way! Steve, do you have experience with any of the cable safety systems out there? Are they effective? Are they any less expensive? In my case,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00062.html (8,642 bytes)

169. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR Controller (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 13:09:31 -0400
I wasn't aware that the FT-1000MP had a problem, but the FT-1000D definitely does, at least with the old controller firmware. Yaesu has done a particularly bad job designing its protocols. For exampl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00082.html (9,991 bytes)

170. Re: [TowerTalk] Does anybody even make the antennas they advertise? (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 00:43:45 -0400
Tax on inventory? The Feds don't tax inventory, only net income. Neither does my state (NH). We tax real estate and business profits, but not inventory. Are there states that actually tax inventory?
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00174.html (8,842 bytes)

171. Re: [TowerTalk] Does anybody even make the antennas they advertise? (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 10:51:51 -0400
Almost. There's an exception to that maxim which illustrates how the paradigm has shifted away from Just-in-Time and Build-to-Order for US companies that outsource overseas to places like China. Typ
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00193.html (11,077 bytes)

172. Re: [TowerTalk] How do you move a gin pole *safely* up the tower? (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 08:00:43 -0400
It sounds like you're not collapsing the gin pole (bringing the head down to the clamp) when you are trying to move it. That definitely makes it much harder to attach the clamp. I tried it a couple o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00597.html (11,194 bytes)

173. Re: [TowerTalk] How do you move a gin pole *safely* up the tower? (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 13:20:42 -0400
I'd probably do that with the standard Rohn gin pole or equivalent, but I used a heavy-duty gin pole from WB0B for my Rohn 55. It's a *lot* heavier than the Rohn gin pole. It might have worked to tie
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00637.html (15,628 bytes)

174. Re: [TowerTalk] How do you move a gin pole *safely* up the tower? (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 13:52:59 -0400
I like the step where you clip the second pulley to the top of the section as it goes past. That eliminates climbing to rig it at the top of the next section. Wish I'd thought of that! ______________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00639.html (14,256 bytes)

175. Re: [TowerTalk] Rebar Cage Question (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 22:34:25 -0400
That may be the case for your local building/electrical code, or perhaps what your inspector *thinks* is required, but it's not required by our local code. That's because it's not required by the Na
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00997.html (12,527 bytes)

176. [TowerTalk] WC1M tower work "complete" (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:18:47 -0400
Is it ever complete? No, I expect plenty of tweaking and maintenance down the line. But at long last the initial heavy lifting has been completed. My 110' Rohn 55 tower now sports a 40-2CD @110' and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg01142.html (8,577 bytes)

177. Re: [TowerTalk] Cadweld Question (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 15:31:41 -0400
When I bought my first Cadweld materials, I purchased a ground rod driving adapter (or whatever it's actually called.) I believe it's a standard part supplied by Erico. At any rate, I got it through
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00010.html (9,367 bytes)

178. Re: [TowerTalk] Cadweld Question (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 15:36:59 -0400
When I bought my first Cadweld materials, I purchased a ground rod driving adapter (or whatever it's actually called.) I believe it's a standard part supplied by Erico. At any rate, I got it through
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00011.html (9,154 bytes)

179. Re: [TowerTalk] CRITTERS AND CABLES (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 21:17:52 -0400
In these parts, any cable laying on the ground is likely to get chewed sooner or later. Some cables must be tastier than others. The critters on my property like LMR-400UF a lot more than Belden 9913
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00026.html (16,694 bytes)

180. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground System (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 23:57:00 -0400
According to literature from Polyphaser, if the ground systems are separated by more than 75 feet, they don't "see each other", so it doesn't make sense to bond them. I believe the reason is that the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00346.html (9,787 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu