Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wn3vaw@fyi.net: 125 ]

Total 125 documents matching your query.

81. [CQ-Contest] Oh well, there's always next year... (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 17:47:11 -0500
Was it my imagination, or were conditions downright terrible today (Sunday) in the contest? If 10 was open to EU for more than about an hour or so today, I'd be downright surprised... Wish now my bos
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00277.html (8,946 bytes)

82. Re: [CQ-Contest] Oh well, there's always next year... (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 07:27:58 -0500
Hmmm. Interesting. 10 PM opening? On Sunday? Wouldn't that have been, oh, 0300 Z after the contest ended? It is unfortunate that my schedule only permitted me to operate Sunday morning and afternoon
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00282.html (11,317 bytes)

83. [CQ-Contest] Remote Antennas and More (score: 1)
Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW)
Date: Mon Feb 7 16:58:57 2000
It sounds like the wording of this rule may need tweaked to allow for modern technology. The spirit of the original rule & related rules, IMHO, was to restrict the operating station to one physical l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-02/msg00035.html (10,651 bytes)

84. [CQ-Contest] Remote Antennas and More (score: 1)
Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW)
Date: Tue Feb 8 17:47:38 2000
Keeping in mind that we never will anticipate the unintended consequences... (or else they'd be intended, right?) 1) DXCC status would be determined by the physical location of the station. 2) Multip
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-02/msg00044.html (9,466 bytes)

85. [CQ-Contest] Re: CQ Contest Digest V3 #44 (score: 1)
Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW)
Date: Sat Feb 26 23:49:35 2000
It's not just an east coast vs. midwest vs. left coast problem. There is nothing more frustrating than finally finding a frequency, while running a modest station, and having the Big Gun an hour up t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-02/msg00188.html (7,159 bytes)

86. [CQ-Contest] Re: CQ Contest Digest V3 #45 (score: 1)
Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW)
Date: Sun Feb 27 22:22:30 2000
What a sad mind-set... It's OK to push someone around if they don't complain about it? BTW... I've noticed this in some recent state QSO parties and other smaller contests -- some non-participants ge
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-02/msg00199.html (7,495 bytes)

87. [CQ-Contest] push around/interference (score: 1)
Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW)
Date: Tue Feb 29 06:19:22 2000
This is one morning I didn't need coffee to wake up. "Why is this so hard to understand?" In a few lines of pseudo-legalesee double-talk, you have justified every bit of unethical, unsportsmanlike co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-02/msg00210.html (8,180 bytes)

88. [CQ-Contest] Does might make right (score: 1)
Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW)
Date: Tue Feb 29 06:50:47 2000
In most of the smaller contests I've been in -- the ones that tend to be a lot more fun and have a lot less to do with inflating one's own ego -- it is not at all unusual for an op who needs to make
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-02/msg00212.html (9,715 bytes)

89. [CQ-Contest] Cal QSO Party (CQP) is 6 Weeks Away!! (score: 1)
Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW)
Date: Fri Aug 20 01:28:26 1999
You're absolutely right... it's not to early to make plans for THE foremost* state QSO party. But it's SEVEN weeks away... Pennsylvania QSO Party, October 9 & 10. So once you warm up with the Left Co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00153.html (7,243 bytes)

90. [CQ-Contest] Cal QSO Party (CQP) is 6 Weeks Away!! (score: 1)
Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW)
Date: Fri Aug 20 01:28:26 1999
You're absolutely right... it's not to early to make plans for THE foremost* state QSO party. But it's SEVEN weeks away... Pennsylvania QSO Party, October 9 & 10. So once you warm up with the Left Co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00414.html (7,242 bytes)

91. [CQ-Contest] WPX Contest Question (score: 1)
Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW)
Date: Tue Apr 2 14:54:58 2002
Gary, I think the short answer is that now that almost every US prefix possible is available (with the exception of the KP/NP/WP blocks from 6 thru 0, as I don't think any of the old old Palmyra KP6
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00017.html (8,580 bytes)

92. [CQ-Contest] politically correct (score: 1)
Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW)
Date: Wed Apr 3 12:54:38 2002
Tom, I'm not sure where you're coming from. When I say that I'm not "serious" in a contest, that only means that I'm out there to hand out Q's, usually S&P, for the benefit of other operators. It's a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00024.html (8,792 bytes)

93. [CQ-Contest] eQSL change of policy (score: 1)
Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW)
Date: Wed Apr 3 23:48:05 2002
K1IR's post disappoints me. Why is any change blamed on ARRL HQ, why is it always bad, and why is always the ARRL which is at fault? Why is ARRL once again being blamed for the conniptions of the 200
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00034.html (11,406 bytes)

94. [CQ-Contest] eQSL change of policy (score: 1)
Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW)
Date: Thu Apr 4 18:00:14 2002
1. I am not saying ARRL is always right. I am saying that ARRL is not automatically always in the wrong. I disagree with ARRL Leadership on many issues, and if you don't believe that, go look at the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00046.html (12,831 bytes)

95. [CQ-Contest] eQSL change of policy (score: 1)
Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW)
Date: Thu Apr 4 18:47:46 2002
Ron, You make an interesting point. Why does ARRL want to define a standard and determine the rules? Could it be because DXCC is their awards program? Where they "slow" to pick up the ball? I think t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00047.html (10,823 bytes)

96. [CQ-Contest] Re eQSL change of policy... (score: 1)
Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW)
Date: Sat Apr 6 13:54:36 2002
Cormac, Good questions. Short answers: 1. For many years, the US FCC has not legally required us to keep a logbook -- and some don't. We are encouraged to do so but it's no longer a legal requirement
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00075.html (7,737 bytes)

97. [CQ-Contest] ARRL awards/contest logs (score: 1)
Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW)
Date: Mon Apr 8 15:17:21 2002
I believe this is the direction they're headed in with the implementation of the Cabrillo format, and ultimately with Logbook of the World (although that's not all LotW is going to do). 73, ron wn3va
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00089.html (7,196 bytes)

98. [CQ-Contest] eQSL change of policy (score: 1)
Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW)
Date: Mon Apr 8 15:27:24 2002
Most of the cards I've been getting lately have either been filled out by hand, or the label has been either signed or stamped in some way to indicate "verified by" the QSL manager(s) and their assis
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00090.html (10,950 bytes)

99. [CQ-Contest] NS3T's wild accusation (score: 1)
Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW)
Date: Sat Apr 13 13:42:50 2002
Tom, My experience was exactly the opposite -- I had a lot of DX stations (I stopped counting at 30) ask me to put them on the cluster. I had 2 or 3 that seemed perturbed when I declined -- one S5 st
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00144.html (8,128 bytes)

100. [CQ-Contest] Field Day Logging (score: 1)
Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW)
Date: Sat Apr 20 19:08:16 2002
I've just been asked by my club's Field Day chairman to serve on the computer/logging committee. First order of business is to decide on a logging program for this year. Two complications: 1) we have
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00261.html (7,249 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu