But (at least for the forseeable future) you won't get everyone to post scores in realtime. Not everyone has or can get a high speed Internet connection. For example, suppose I somehow glom onto a hu
Yes Paul, criticism of public logs will continue. And the innocent will be unjustly accused and forced unfairly to defend themselves. The end result? Contesters will begin to wonder if it's worth the
If you need an older machine running Win98SE to run CT on, contact me off reflector & we can talk about it! 73 --Original Message-- From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@
Personally, I'm not a big enough little pistol to even worry about a threat like that, let alone get one. I think you should have the headers of that little ditty examined and traced. If it came from
Agreed! And he should be well commended for it! Pity that he's kicked over so many rocks and exposed so many little pests that scurry away, metaphorically speaking, that most have either quit or are
"My question is - why MUST the call be part of the exchange when it's already "exchanged" as part of the QSO initiation process?" Why not? The exchange is the exchange. It specifies that certain info
DQ might be a bit harsh. Surely if a penalty is called for, it doesn't have to be all or nothing! Still... the exchange is a touch lengthy but pretty clear. SN, precedence (power/class), call, year o
So, let me get this straight, David. You're saying that because the Cabrillo file format for SS doesn't sequence the log information in the same exact order it's sent, we can therefore ignore SS rule
I for one don't have a problem with this. If you disagree with the exchange or the rigid format the exchange is supposed to be sent in, then take it up with the League and argue your point. And pleas
You are? From Ireland? This I've got to see... <snip> It's good to feel "wanted" :-) I am eligible now to play in SS, as is any non-W/VE citizen who has a CEPT licence. My interest in SS was sparked
Not quite. First: The US Department of Commerce didn't start issuing Amateur Radio licenses until 1912. So even though there are a handful of stations that first went on the air in 1909 (W1MX (1XM) M
And people wonder why I gave up WN3VAW. After 30+ years of busted calls, enough was enough < g >! To this day, I wonder how many cards are sitting at the bureau for N3VAW (who was a Tech the last tim
I don't get it. For all the kvetching & moaning that has been ongoing on this reflector about whether or not we really have a significant problem with cheating... Dave come along and provides a stati
All the more reason to publicize this information. If someone is faking LZ9A's call on the cluster, as LZ2HM says, the station ops should be made aware of it ASAP. It would be a real nasty stunt if a
Let's apply a little use of Occam's Razor to this. If all of the stations listed on the 3655 group's web site had 2nd harmonic problems while on 160, wouldn't there be a little bit more heard about i
But it's sure funny that ONLY the operators on 3655 have actively complained about 2nd harmonics. If the problem was on the transmitter end of the folks on 160, wouldn't it stand to reason that you'd
Sorry. I don't think that this is wise. It brings to mind a small incident many, many moons ago, under my previous call. I had just started in a state QSO party. My fourth or fifth contact informed m
Or W3WH, W3WC, and W3WN (as happened last weekend), let alone W3WN and N2WN and other call combinations that are VERY similar. Work now, dupe sheet later! 73 I'll second that! Particularly when both
We've been debating this topic on and off for at least 15 years, and yet one question remains unanswered: Why do YOU want to look at MY log? It's one thing for the log to be turned in as part of the