Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wn3vaw@verizon.net: 729 ]

Total 729 documents matching your query.

241. Re: [CQ-Contest] [RTTY] I just have to ask (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 16:45:31 -0500
Propagation beacons are one of the more useful tools in a DX'er's and contester's arsenal, as they can give you a passive indication of propagation on a particular band to a particular part of the wo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00114.html (11,869 bytes)

242. Re: [CQ-Contest] [RTTY] I just have to ask (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 22:32:36 -0400
With all due respect... the beacon network, as I recall, didn't get "shoved" into the digital sub-band; if anything, it was the other way around. Why are we even discussing the potential for moving t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00121.html (12,780 bytes)

243. Re: [CQ-Contest] multi-contesting (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:54:11 -0400
It didn't help that after MARAC had put their list together, some of the MARAC people started demanding that all state QSO parties switch to their abbrevriations. As I recall, one state QSO party did
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00465.html (11,671 bytes)

244. Re: [CQ-Contest] Do serial numbers in contests hinder participation? (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:06:20 -0400
I've had a few occasions, usually in the Pa QSO Party, when I've made contacts with stations in another contest. When the exchange with the "other" contest was a SN, I simply gave the same SN as my P
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00466.html (10,673 bytes)

245. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2008 WPX CW Contest Results now on-line (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:05:13 -0400
I just got off the phone with Randy N3ZK. His certificate arrived in the mail today -- once he got home, he was thrilled. (His wife called him at work to try to tell him what came, but something got
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00502.html (9,367 bytes)

246. Re: [CQ-Contest] multi-contesting (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:25:04 -0400
Aren't we putting the cart before the horse here? (1) How big a problem is it really to handle multiple state QSO parties or multiple contests on the same weekend at the same time? How many contester
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00503.html (21,136 bytes)

247. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX SSB and Earth Hour (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:27:43 -0400
No problem. I'll just have to fire up the Swan 350, take the covers off, and operate by the lights of the drivers & finals for an hour! <g> And remember, the only time you need to be Politically Corr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00534.html (9,898 bytes)

248. Re: [CQ-Contest] [PaQSO] 2009 PAQSO Party Announcements (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 17:48:13 -0400
Oh no. That would conflict with the Poisson d'Avril contest. Didn't see any announcements about it this year. Not to worry; since I'm announcing it, you should also know that I won it this year. Trus
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00025.html (14,011 bytes)

249. Re: [CQ-Contest] ETHICS (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:26:15 -0400
Not that I condone the practice of US amateurs not knowing where they're allowed to operate (far from it); the problem, Doug, that as a non-US licensed amateur, how would you be reasonably expected t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00061.html (8,564 bytes)

250. Re: [CQ-Contest] [PaQSO] 2009 PAQSO Party Announcements (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:33:41 -0400
Ah. I see the problem. I operated in the San Seriff Poisson d'Avril contest. And have already been declared the winner by my friend Siddhartha. You may have heard of him. He was very famous for a sho
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00063.html (10,109 bytes)

251. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes -Automatic Fill - 93 or 67 (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:38:09 -0400
Well, it's very simple. You copy and log what is sent, not what the computer says was done in years past. Failure to do so at your own (score's) peril. The check is supposed to be the year the operat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00168.html (11,132 bytes)

252. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check this (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:48:04 -0400
Tree, I think you can take your tongue out of your cheek now. My only point in mentioning the "lap" in checks is simply that for three more years, there will be certain checks that are not possible.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00210.html (9,556 bytes)

253. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Super Check Partial Files Available VER20090411 (11 Apr 2009) (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 07:35:21 -0400
Technically, no, since you are not getting live, real-time, on-air-at-the-time help from another human being... just a reference from past activities from a database file. But... if you're not comfor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00234.html (10,663 bytes)

254. Re: [CQ-Contest] Mobile operation uploads to LOTW (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 22:33:48 -0400
The information after the slash is important if it indicates a different DXCC entity than the one indicated by the station call (for example, KP2/W3WN). It is not important, for DXCC purposes, if it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-05/msg00086.html (14,495 bytes)

255. Re: [CQ-Contest] Mobile operation uploads to LOTW (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 20:57:11 -0400
I think Tom has missed my point. There is, so far as I know, NO single set series of rules governing the ?/? situation. There can?t be, as the rules can change due to the administration using them, t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-05/msg00109.html (14,708 bytes)

256. [CQ-Contest] Op Needed for IARU? (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:31:58 -0400
It appears that there's a better-than 50/50 chance that I'm going to be in Washington, DC (Alexandria VA actually) on the evening of Saturday, July 11th, with absolutely nothing to do except sit in t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00158.html (7,586 bytes)

257. Re: [CQ-Contest] Xtreme category, catch 22 (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:04:33 -0400
Well, I see your point Sandy. Here's the thing, though (IMHO, of course). It's one thing to set up & remotely operate, if you can manage the expense and other headaches, a station at some point on th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00251.html (15,435 bytes)

258. Re: [CQ-Contest] Xtreme Category: the sky is NOT falling (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:13:49 -0400
If I work a station in the contest who says he's in Pottslyvania, and another who says he's in Mooslyvania... but all the time the operators are sitting comfortably in their home QTH of Frostbite Fal
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00253.html (10,985 bytes)

259. Re: [CQ-Contest] Xtreme category, catch 22 (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:16:22 -0400
There's a rule too often ignored! < snip > The current rules advise that UNSPORTSMAN-LIKE BEHAVIOR will subject the entrant to DQ. < snip > _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00259.html (9,713 bytes)

260. [CQ-Contest] Extreme vs. Time Limited (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:30:07 -0400
I'm curious. Why is there such a strong push for this "Extreme" category, on the [as yet unproven] grounds that it will improve the radio art and increase participation by others. but appears to only
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00277.html (7,982 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu