Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wrt@dslextreme.com: 143 ]

Total 143 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [RTTY] Re: Noise with MMTTY (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 09:07:51 -0800
_________________________________________________________ I've noticed a similar effect on CW myself. Often I can copy CW better with a wide filter instead of a narrow one, even though the apparent n
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00327.html (8,333 bytes)

102. Re: [RTTY] Filters (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 07:21:24 -0800
_________________________________________________________ When I'm using a 250 Hz filter, quite often when two stations are within 10-20 Hz of each other and nearly the same strength, I can tune off
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00358.html (7,859 bytes)

103. Re: [RTTY] Inrad filters for rtty question (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 07:29:02 -0800
_________________________________________________________ As long as one has an oscilloscope for tuning, it's easy to tell which way to tune based on the angle of the ellipse. It never takes me more
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00359.html (8,492 bytes)

104. Re: [RTTY] Re: Noise with MMTTY (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 07:41:38 -0800
<snip> _________________________________________________________ Fascinating insight. Thanks, Kok. -- 73, Bill W6WRT QSLs via LoTW _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RT
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00361.html (8,913 bytes)

105. Re: [RTTY] Re: Noise with MMTTY (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 07:46:59 -0800
_________________________________________________________ Quite correct. RTTY is a form of FM (think of a carrier being frequency modulated by a square wave) and as such, it has sidebands. For a 170
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00362.html (9,164 bytes)

106. Re: [RTTY] Re: Noise with MMTTY (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 07:48:58 -0800
_________________________________________________________ You don't have to go to that expense. A TS-870S has near-perfect filters for RTTY. -- Bill, W6WRT QSLs via LoTW _____________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00363.html (8,404 bytes)

107. Re: [RTTY] Re: Noise with MMTTY (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 07:57:41 -0800
_________________________________________________________ I think the best use of AFC is to have a separate tuning indicator such as an oscilloscope and do the tuning with it. Then when you have the
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00364.html (9,338 bytes)

108. Re: [RTTY] Region III Band Plan (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 08:05:52 -0800
_________________________________________________________ Here in Region II, the ARRL has designated 7040 as the RTTY DX calling frequency, while for decades 7040 has been recognized as the CW QRP ca
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00365.html (7,506 bytes)

109. Re: MMTTY AFC, O-scope (Re: [RTTY] Re: Noise with MMTTY (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 08:41:19 -0800
_________________________________________________________ I split the difference, tuning so the bars (ellipses) are equally "off". Seems to work ok as long as they don't exceed 200 Hz by much. It see
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00367.html (8,930 bytes)

110. Re: MMTTY AFC, O-scope (Re: [RTTY] Re: Noise with MMTTY (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 09:27:15 -0800
_________________________________________________________ According to Brian, K6STI - whose opinion I highly respect - the wider shift provides more resistance to selective fading, as you mention abo
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00369.html (9,922 bytes)

111. Re: [RTTY] Filters (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 07:12:34 -0800
_________________________________________________________ I think it does have to do with bandwidth, in the sense that if you have a very wide filter (500 Hz or more) tuning off to one side will not
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00404.html (8,228 bytes)

112. Re: [RTTY] Spring Break RTTY Sprint (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 09:03:12 -0700
_________________________________________________________ It will be soon. I have stopped paper QSL's unless there is an SASE enclosed, and when I run out of my current supply of QSL's, I'll stop ent
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00047.html (8,406 bytes)

113. Re: [RTTY] DXP38 went Ooops need to explore new ways to do rtty andother modes (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 20:41:30 -0700
_________________________________________________________ Of all the free programs, MMTTY is among the best if not the best. Download it at http://www.qsl.net/mmhamsoft/mmtty/ Don't be intimidated by
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00066.html (7,881 bytes)

114. Re: [RTTY] Mailing List (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 20:45:49 -0700
_________________________________________________________ And why not, pray tell? Yahoo groups works fine for me - six different groups subscribed to with nary a problem. And you can't beat the price
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00067.html (7,684 bytes)

115. Re: [RTTY] Mailing List (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 20:45:53 -0700
_________________________________________________________ www.groups.yahoo.com would be my guess. I subscribe to six different groups on yahoo and they all work fine. I see no reason for an individua
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00068.html (7,713 bytes)

116. Re: [RTTY] Spring Break RTTY Sprint (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 20:48:06 -0700
_________________________________________________________ You might as well ask how are you going to QSL with those guys who never order blank QSLs. If they want to QSL via LoTW they will find a way.
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00069.html (9,262 bytes)

117. Re: [RTTY] T33C (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 20:53:57 -0700
_________________________________________________________ Please just indicate the actual RF frequency. If you're using FSK that should be what the dial says. With AFSK, who knows but you? :-) RF fre
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00070.html (7,732 bytes)

118. Re: [RTTY] Finally bit the bullet... (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 21:19:46 -0700
_________________________________________________________ It is good, but getting it set up can be a bit tricky. Keep after it and do join the WriteLog reflector at contesting.com and also see Don's
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00071.html (7,294 bytes)

119. Re: DX Spotting was: [RTTY] T33C (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 08:58:19 -0700
_________________________________________________________ C'mon guys, we all have our preferences for hamming. Personally, I admire KS0M for making Honor Roll the hard way. I still have two to go an
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00125.html (9,314 bytes)

120. Re: [RTTY] RTTY QSOs in T33C online log (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 07:35:22 -0700
_________________________________________________________ My RTTY Q's appeared within about 24 hours, same as CW/SSB. -- Bill, W6WRT QSLs via LoTW _______________________________________________ RTTY
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00136.html (6,810 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 120
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
This search system is powered by Namazu