_________________________________________________________ Why destroy the connector? If it looks like Telfon (opaque white), touch a very hot iron to the plastic. If it doesn't melt, it's Teflon. If
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:58:25 +0200, Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com> wrote: _________________________________________________________ Bad attitude. Into the killfile he goes. -- Bill, W7TI
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 21:17:38 -0400, "Jerry Muller" <k0tv@adelphia.net> wrote: _________________________________________________________ Seems to me that you're the one that got off easy. I can see th
_________________________________________________________ Well, I'll be glad to 'splain it to you, Rob. Many people (myself NOT included) buy their home partly for their own property and partly for t
I said no such thing. Read my post again. Of course it does. An attitude like yours is why there are "neighbor problems" in the first place. More nonsense. A 50 foot tower is quite a different thing
Surely you jest. You are "free" to obey the law, just like everyone else. Your "Personal Property Rights" are what the gummint says they are, no more and no less. Did you honestly think otherwise? Th
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 20:51:53 -0000, "Bob Puharic" <wf3h@ptd.net> wrote: Sorry my friend, America is indeed a democracy. There are several versions of democracy; a republic is just one kind. Get out y
_________________________________________________________ Check the header and see. We're talking about the relationship between hams, their towers and local zoning boards. Comprende? -- 73, Bill W7T
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 18:15:18 -0400, "Jerry Muller" <k0tv@adelphia.net> wrote: _________________________________________________________ I can't really tell from the pictures, Jerry, and what I think
_________________________________________________________ The town right next to me is called Flamingo Heights. Wait till they hear about this. :-) -- 73, Bill W7TI
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 18:13:13 -0700, Scott Townley <nx7u@arrl.net> wrote: _________________________________________________________ Reminds me of the good 'ol days. Back in the late '50s, QST had at l
<massive snip> _________________________________________________________ Jim, you obviously believe hams have all the rights and neighbors have none. Fine. Believe what you want. -- 73, Bill W7TI
_________________________________________________________ The right to live in an attractive neighborhood. It's why they don't build nice houses next to junkyards or steel mills. You and I may think
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 09:07:33 -0500, "srefurd" <srefurd@earthlink.net> wrote: Believe me, I am the last one to want restrictions on towers, but I think we need to be aware of the neighbor's point of v
That's what most of us do. Sorry, but that's not true. Think about it for a moment: Every zoning ordinance or regulation now in effect (not just antennas) was at one time nonexistent. All of them wer
Restrictive covenants are a different issue from zoning laws. I've not dealt with covenants personally, but I understand they are MUCH harder to get around. Zoning laws can be appealed or changed by
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 12:27:59 -0400, "J.P. Kleinhaus" <w2xx@cloud9.net> wrote: _________________________________________________________ $20,000 is appalling. I can't believe you paid it. I never woul
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 09:46:02 -0700, Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net> wrote: _________________________________________________________ You argument is fallacious for the simple fact that a city majority
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 11:55:10 -0500, "Gene Bigham" <jbigham2@kc.rr.com> wrote: _________________________________________________________ Gene has exactly the right approach. Anyone suffering from test
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003 07:57:47 -0400, Jerry Muller <k0tv@adelphia.net> wrote: We're getting a bit emotional here by using the word "stomp", but the majority does indeed have the right to overrule a min