Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wt4i@cfl.rr.com: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Bandwidth of a RTTY signal (was:SO2R RTTY Radio) (score: 1)
Author: wt4i@cfl.rr.com (Bruce Lifter, WT4I rr)
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 19:09:17 -0400
It is my experience that both 250Hz and 500Hz filters both have their strengths. I generally run with 500 Hz filters unless the bands get too crowded. I like to hear what is close to me. Additionally
/archives//html/RTTY/2001-08/msg00316.html (11,926 bytes)

2. [RTTY] Spectrum of RTTY signal (score: 1)
Author: wt4i@cfl.rr.com (Bruce Lifter, WT4I rr)
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 19:15:21 -0400
I did my best to take Chen's figure and overlay one of INRAD's 250Hz filters. (I did a screen capture dumped it into paint and then played "connect the dots" with the data extrapolated from the INRAD
/archives//html/RTTY/2001-08/msg00348.html (10,009 bytes)

3. [RTTY] Re: NAQP SCORE (score: 1)
Author: wt4i@cfl.rr.com (Bruce Lifter, WT4I rr)
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 09:56:24 -0400
In my opinion, 3830 is not the right answer. I have been subscribed to 3830 for a year or more. To me it is too cold and sanitized. There is almost never any replies to the postings. It makes me wond
/archives//html/RTTY/2001-07/msg00212.html (9,237 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu