Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:xdavid@cis-broadband.com: 506 ]

Total 506 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:38:46 -0700
I think maybe you misconstrued my comment. I never proposed nor meant to constrain suggestions or comments on this topic. I've found each and every part of th discussion to be interesting, and I assu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00267.html (16,158 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Skimmer - Don't Change Anything (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 11:10:13 -0700
I've never understood the argument that the rules shouldn't be modified to deal with Skimmer and similar technologies simply because Skimmer doesn't yet work well enough to make a significant differe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00376.html (12,203 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] Eliminate SO Unassisted? (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:13:41 -0700
Enforceability is irrelevant. We already have all kinds of rules that are impossible to enforce. It's impossible to detect if a single op is getting help with mults from a second ham in the shack. It
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00407.html (9,052 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking errors (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 20:19:14 -0700
I'm not sure I've ever seen righteous indignation carried to such ridiculously unwarranted extremes on such a relatively minor issue, and directed toward such an undeserving crew of volunteers. Someb
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00129.html (9,829 bytes)

45. [CQ-Contest] ARRL Triple Play Award (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 19:49:32 -0700
From the latest ARRL Letter: "The Board voted to create a Triple Play Award. This new award, set to be implemented by January 2009, will be given to those amateurs who achieve Worked All States (WAS)
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00193.html (8,001 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL and Open Logs - Time for the next step? (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:42:02 -0700
Maybe I misunderstood Pete's proposal, but I thought the presumption behind it was that QSOs verified by the contest sponsor (especially if the sponsor was the ARRL) could be loaded into LoTW as vali
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00249.html (11,305 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2008 ARRL DX Phone Results and opting out (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:28:07 -0700
I believe that has been proposed at least a few times before and the ARRL has always rejected it out of hand ... usually coupled with some nonsense about QST being the flagship publication that every
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00000.html (8,387 bytes)

48. [CQ-Contest] Virtualization Software (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:52:06 -0700
My oldest son is a software engineer working for a company in Tucson, but on his own he's lately been playing around with computer virtualization, a software concept that essentially allows a user to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00036.html (8,232 bytes)

49. Re: [CQ-Contest] Angle of received signal QUERY (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:37:48 -0700
Hi, Tony. The optimum angle (takeoff or reception) for signals is a function of your latitude/longitude, the particular path you are trying to work, and the magnitude of solar flux. N6BV ran tons of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00143.html (11,006 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 21:43:59 -0700
Which do you think is more likely to drive away the average, honest contester ... knowing that others will have access to his honest log or knowing that the cheats are going to be protected by a code
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00140.html (8,757 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW rtty - condx ?! (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 19:46:02 -0700
Yeah, it worked both ways. I worked a very loud Scandinavian station that was having a devil of a time raising stateside stations on SSB. He was really puzzled about that until I told him about the R
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00338.html (8,634 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] How do you get better? A few more ideas... (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2008 12:06:40 -0700
I've been DXing for 40 years, but I'm a relative newcomer to contesting so I created a simple Excel spreadsheet to help me analyze the logs of others to get some insight into strategy and potential o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00019.html (10,365 bytes)

53. [CQ-Contest] CW Practice (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2008 23:23:08 -0700
With N1MM, I've gone entire CW contests without touching a key, and since I don't ragchew much my sending is getting pretty rusty. I could just use the sidetone on the rig to practice sending stuff f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00022.html (7,589 bytes)

54. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Keying Cable (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 08:32:26 -0700
Some optocouplers have single transistor outputs, and some have Darlingtons (less common). The Darlingtons have higher gain (more sensitive to input current) but like any Darlington they won't pull d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00175.html (9,442 bytes)

55. Re: [CQ-Contest] Malicious Interference during SS (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:08:28 -0700
14275 is the notorious hangout of VE7KFM (aka "Radio Canada" as he calls himself) and a handful of stateside outlaws who live purely to compete with him for profanity and idiocy. They show up at vari
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00400.html (9,796 bytes)

56. [CQ-Contest] QSO Acknowledgement (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:54:23 -0700
While making S&P passes across the band in the contest this last weekend there were several DX stations who simply gave their callsign again at the end of a contact ... no TU, no "dit dit" or other c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00053.html (7,238 bytes)

57. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 11:04:01 -0700
I realize your proposal is well-intentioned, but I just have to speak up here. Not only do I think it is extremely unworkable due to it's complexity and bureaucratic nature, I think it would be prone
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00254.html (15,404 bytes)

58. Re: [CQ-Contest] The dupes? (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:05:44 -0700
Jukka, as I mentioned to you in a private email, the problem is that in perhaps 90% of the cases the other station will simply depart the frequency as soon as you send QSO B4 and pause for a reply. M
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00312.html (11,627 bytes)

59. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW CW & 6Y1V Logs (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:08:49 -0700
I don't get it. There is NOTHING in anyone's logs that isn't public knowledge one way or another (assuming someone wanted to go through the trouble to monitor your station). And if the "presumption o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-01/msg00267.html (12,118 bytes)

60. [CQ-Contest] [Re: CQWW CW & 6Y1V Logs] (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:48:45 -0700
I don't think there's anything "wrong" with KY1V deciding not to submit his log ... for any reason. I do, however, think it's misguided and inconsistent of him to make a public spectacle of it in ord
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-01/msg00285.html (8,227 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu