Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:xdavid@cis-broadband.com: 950 ]

Total 950 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [TowerTalk] exploding concrete (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 12:24:31 -0700
I think that's the same article referenced here earlier by W9AC. And yes, the tower base by itself doesn't really qualify as a Ufer ground. The rebar cage, distributed throughout the foundation and l
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00533.html (8,794 bytes)

102. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 09:39:48 -0700
I'd bet that the manuals for many amateur antennas are indeed copies of copies, and a master copy in digital format probably never existed in the first place. In those cases, the manufacturers probab
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00681.html (9,689 bytes)

103. Re: [TowerTalk] Coper clad steel (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:59:37 -0700
I'm sure that is good stuff, but at $64 per 1000 feet for bare #16 you can do almost the same for #14 wire at Home Depot, especially if you include shipping. There is a guy on eBay who fairly regular
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00756.html (8,944 bytes)

104. Re: [TowerTalk] Extending a concrete base? (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:38:56 -0700
There are various additives that give cement products better adhesion, the most common being some form of acrylic. Milk was even sometimes used in the past. You can buy the acrylic additives in quart
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00780.html (9,778 bytes)

105. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m 1/4 Wave Vertical Results Thus Far... (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 21:34:23 -0700
Unless I missed something along the thread, I'm not sure he's using any sort of line isolator at the feedpoint either. If that's the case, he's probably got lots of interaction between the radials an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00829.html (9,125 bytes)

106. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Base Photos (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 23:20:11 -0700
You can also check out the many photos on the AN Wireless site. http://www.anwireless.com/photo.html 73, Dave AB7E _______________________________________________ ____________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00256.html (9,154 bytes)

107. Re: [TowerTalk] Shorty 40 (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:46:10 -0700
Force 12's own website says their more recent coil-loaded Delta 240 is intended to replace the older linear loaded EF-240S, their explanation being: "The most difficult aspect of the antenna was tuni
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00397.html (8,777 bytes)

108. Re: [TowerTalk] Shorty 40 (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:51:43 -0700
I've always liked the Moxon performance features (broad bandwidth, great F/B, smaller turning radius), and even considered buying the OptiBeam OB2-40M for a while until I decided to stick with the lo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00410.html (9,301 bytes)

109. Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted L for 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 15:37:11 -0700
Wrong again, Carl. I've seen it mentioned here several times on this reflector that radials such a small a percent of a wavelength above ground really don't act as tuned elevated radials since they c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00448.html (9,634 bytes)

110. Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted L for 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 15:50:13 -0700
I don't get it. That's going to generate several thousand documents to wade through, most of which won't address your claim. Why come back with such an obtuse and evasive answer if you actually have
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00449.html (10,204 bytes)

111. Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted L for 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 17:40:55 -0700
I'm going to take WA9FPT's advice from here on out, but just to clarify: a. The other comments come from people with more credibility than you have. b. I never said that it was necessary to pursue a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00457.html (13,287 bytes)

112. Re: [TowerTalk] Unique Short Radial Challenge (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 12:29:43 -0700
Rick, maybe the experts will correct me, but I don't think symmetry is particularly important for a radial system. You should get better performance in whichever direction you have more and longer ra
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00469.html (11,243 bytes)

113. [TowerTalk] Series Section Transmission Line Matching (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 12:55:24 -0700
I have a question for the math and/or transmission line experts on this list. The ARRL Handbook has some good info on using two different sections of transmission line, each with different characteri
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00470.html (8,139 bytes)

114. Re: [TowerTalk] Top loading HF-6V for 160 (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 15:12:36 -0700
I agree, Terry. If aesthetics aren't a big issue, I'd put as much surface area of metal up there as I could. In that vein, larger diameter wire is helpful as well. For what it may be worth, I have fo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00473.html (10,505 bytes)

115. Re: [TowerTalk] [NitPickTalk] Inverted L for 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 11:12:45 -0700
Hi, Brett. I think you are correct on all counts, even though I still think radials close to the ground (in terms of a wavelength) tend to as if they were actually on the ground. That sounds contradi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00498.html (13,120 bytes)

116. Re: [TowerTalk] Alternative To Rohn Anti-Climb Sections (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:07:17 -0700
That would seem to me to create more liability, not less .... Dave AB7E _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTal
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00556.html (9,123 bytes)

117. Re: [TowerTalk] Wire Antenna Dilemma...Help me decide! (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:18:00 -0700
With all due respect, I don't believe that is true. Higher is almost always better, especially on the low bands, at least if you're trying to work beyond the adjacent state. Better takeoff angle, low
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00629.html (11,775 bytes)

118. Re: [TowerTalk] tower accident (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 10:54:02 -0700
Tony, sorry to say this, but if you think free climbing a 42 foot tower is any safer than a taller one, we'll probably be reading more about you before you get old. Dave AB7E ________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00691.html (9,156 bytes)

119. Re: [TowerTalk] tower accident (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:40:29 -0700
Time for us to lighten up on Tony. He has taken the feedback to heart, ordered some safety gear, and intends to use it. 73, Dave AB7E _______________________________________________ _________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00734.html (9,365 bytes)

120. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Incident Survey (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:47:04 -0700
Doug, That seems awfully silly. Why would it take more than one instance to prove its value? There's already at least a few ex-hams who ended up permanently below ground solely because they DIDN'T ha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00748.html (8,834 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu