Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:zbrlecic@TORHOSP.TORONTO.ON.CA: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] QSL'ing (score: 1)
Author: zbrlecic@torhosp.toronto.on.ca (Brlecic, Zoran)
Date: Mon Feb 16 22:52:04 1998
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. -- =_NextPart_000_01BD3B2C.EDAC1700 Content-Type: text/plain To
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00153.html (12,844 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Re: Optimum Keyer Speed for WPX (score: 1)
Author: zbrlecic@torhosp.toronto.on.ca (Brlecic, Zoran)
Date: Tue May 27 17:46:00 1997
hasbeen started I have found stations sending numbers for their first qso's, wrote Why would you do that? What difference does it make whether you log in 4 or 004? Zoran VA3GW -- CQ-Contest on WWW:
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-05/msg00242.html (8,175 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] RE: cut nums (score: 1)
Author: zbrlecic@torhosp.toronto.on.ca (Brlecic, Zoran)
Date: Fri May 30 18:04:00 1997
Just to add another perspective to the cut numbers saga: in the Canada Day contest, the exchange for Ontario stations is 599 ON. You wanna guess how many people interpret that as 59(9) 09? 73 ... Zor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-05/msg00351.html (6,680 bytes)

4. JATKO:[CQ-Contest] X5 Prefix (score: 1)
Author: zbrlecic@torhosp.toronto.on.ca (Brlecic, Zoran)
Date: Wed Jun 25 12:34:00 1997
The question is meaningless, because X5 stations are physically located in the territory of Bosnia-Herzegovina. No license from anybody in the world, except from the authorized body within the Repub
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-06/msg00279.html (7,508 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Canada Day Contest Results (score: 1)
Author: zbrlecic@torhosp.toronto.on.ca (Brlecic, Zoran)
Date: Wed Jul 2 19:13:00 1997
Hi, everybody! Does anyone know if and where it's possible to find on the Internet the Canada Day Contest results from the last couple of years? The RAC site has nothing. Can anyone provide some info
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00027.html (6,571 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] QSL practices. (score: 1)
Author: zbrlecic@torhosp.toronto.on.ca (Brlecic, Zoran)
Date: Wed Oct 15 12:41:00 1997
I hope some of these guys finally get the message: not qsling does not pay off. I've been using a similar tactics in my casual contesting, and I am sure I am not the only one. Yankee Clipper guys an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-10/msg00200.html (8,451 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] CQWW: M/S or M/M? (score: 1)
Author: zbrlecic@torhosp.toronto.on.ca (Brlecic, Zoran)
Date: Wed Nov 5 11:50:00 1997
But can someone explain how a station with 17 operators, 10 transceivers, 6 amplifiers,and 14 PC's can be a a Multiop/Singletransmitter effort rather than multi/multi? Thanks, Martin ZL1ANJ It does n
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00083.html (7,108 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] Re: VO2RAC in RAC contest - Labrador (score: 1)
Author: zbrlecic@TORHOSP.TORONTO.ON.CA (Brlecic, Zoran)
Date: Tue Dec 30 15:49:43 1997
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. -- =_NextPart_000_01BD19E9.9AB99590 Content-Type: text/plain; c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00517.html (17,911 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu