Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+$no\s+subject$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+$no\s+subject$\s*$/: 209 ]

Total 209 documents matching your query.

21. [AMPS] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: KB9GKC@aol.com (KB9GKC@aol.com); Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 10:53:56 EDT; remove -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search: http://ww; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00346.html (6,809 bytes)
22. [AMPS] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: w6ru@lightspeed.net (Terry Gaiser); Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 09:47:24 -0700; All you guys that are trying so desperately to exit this list are blowing it. Send your "remove" request to amps-REQUEST@contesting.com NOT the "Submissions" URL. Terry W6RU -- Original Message -- --; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00350.html (7,746 bytes)
23. [AMPS] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: gaskoub@mhtc.net (George Skoubis); Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 21:27:48 -0500; remove -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search: http://ww; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00353.html (6,788 bytes)
24. [AMPS] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 03:04:15 -0700; ? It's almost as if they are so mad they can't see straight. - cheers, Terry. Rich... R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00369.html (7,273 bytes)
25. [AMPS] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: zeitler@ibm.net (zeitler@ibm.net); Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 22:21:25 -0800; Perhaps Sir Carl, perhaps. For unknown reasons R.L. Drake engineers chose to run only c. 2700 volts on the plates which is a real shame. The amp really likes HV or around 3600. This is a beutiful am; /archives//html/Amps/1998-12/msg00000.html (17,265 bytes)
26. [AMPS] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 10:44:08 -0500; Hey...cut out that sir stuff! For unknown reasons R.L. Drake engineers The ultimate conversion is plugging in a pair of 3CX1200A7's, building a real PS and driving with a cranked up FT-1000D. Also a; /archives//html/Amps/1998-12/msg00006.html (20,314 bytes)
27. [AMPS] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Tue, 1 Dec 98 15:25:42 -0600; I know what you mean hear Carl, but it kinda has a funny meaning if you read it again. I think the last thing I want an amp to do is to "FLY." With all the debate on oscillations and Tom Rauch desig; /archives//html/Amps/1998-12/msg00011.html (7,412 bytes)
28. [AMPS] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 20:13:11 -0500; That was deliberate Jon...you should know me by now! What gets me upset is those...particularly lurkers and newcomers.... that dont understand my attempts at humor, caustic it may be. I grew up watch; /archives//html/Amps/1998-12/msg00015.html (9,124 bytes)
29. FW: [AMPS] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: w4eto@rmii.com (Richard W. Ehrhorn); Date: Fri, 4 Dec 1998 14:29:46 -0700; Hi Bill... Enjoyed reading you posting (below) - naturally! But with all due respect, even ALPHAs aren't "TOTALLY" idiot-proof. The reason is - and please understand that the following absolutely is; /archives//html/Amps/1998-12/msg00055.html (10,799 bytes)
30. [AMPS] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: zeitler@ibm.net (zeitler@ibm.net); Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 17:08:35 -0800; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_006F_01BE1C84.110EDC80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =20 Dan, the point of a; /archives//html/Amps/1998-11/msg00000.html (24,587 bytes)
31. [AMPS] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 20:50:57 -0500; SNIP Just sit in the Hawaiian sun and watch the moss and other tropical things grow on that roller inductor. I'll bet you it is arced beyond repair in 2yrs or less. AH, the Edsel had so much good pre; /archives//html/Amps/1998-11/msg00001.html (9,435 bytes)
32. [AMPS] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Mon, 30 Nov 98 20:55:53 -0600; Alan, I am not trying to take Dan's side in this. But you did say that it has the BEST RF components in the tank of ANY amp. Why then are you criticizing it now? Are you saying that some components; /archives//html/Amps/1998-11/msg00004.html (9,744 bytes)
33. [AMPS] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 21:52:14 -0500; The RF deck..yes. the PS was worse than Heath or Dentron. I would guess that amp (and the L-7) were designed by 2 committees that never talked to each other. Second to that is the Command HF-2500. Do; /archives//html/Amps/1998-11/msg00008.html (16,572 bytes)
34. [AMPS] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: k7xm@qsl.net (Hugh Phillips - K7XM); Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 20:49:42 -0700; Can't we move on to something more productive! 73, Hugh K7XM -- 73, Hugh K7XM Elizabeth, Co., 35 miles SE of Denver @ 63ØØ feet ex: KR7Y,KS6O (KS6O/OHØ, KS6O/SMØ, Ø; /archives//html/Amps/1998-11/msg00009.html (10,870 bytes)
35. [AMPS] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 22:45:32 -0500; On Mon, 30 Nov 1998 18:58:20 -0800 "Radiodan W7RF" <RFpower@radiodan.com> writes: Since when have I ever sold a refurbed SB-220? You are pretty confused old boy! I do sell 6M only conversions but mak; /archives//html/Amps/1998-11/msg00011.html (11,928 bytes)
36. [AMPS] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: K4ab@aol.com (K4ab@aol.com); Date: Sat, 28 Nov 1998 16:13:14 EST; For the second time in as many contests, my Ameritron AL-1500 developed a problem during the contest. Probably not a major problem, but certainly a nuisance. My question...what is the most durable, l; /archives//html/Amps/1998-11/msg00360.html (7,876 bytes)
37. [AMPS] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: RFpower@radiodan.com (Radiodan W7RF); Date: Sat, 28 Nov 1998 14:12:51 -0800; HI Larry, They're not small, light, or compact, but they are THE most Rugged, Reliable amplifiers anywhere. Get a HENRY. No brag........just FACT! 73, Dan Magro W7RF, (member SCDXC, SCCC) Rugged, Rel; /archives//html/Amps/1998-11/msg00361.html (9,948 bytes)
38. [AMPS] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Sat, 28 Nov 1998 18:10:03 -0500; A few simple mods will improve that amps reliability.....something MFJ will not even admit to. IMO it is the Alpha 91b if you dont mind manual tune...take a look at the major DXpeditions of the past; /archives//html/Amps/1998-11/msg00362.html (10,901 bytes)
39. [AMPS] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Sat, 28 Nov 1998 18:42:48 -0500; On Sat, 28 Nov 1998 14:12:51 -0800 "Radiodan W7RF" <RFpower@radiodan.com> writes: And I wouldnt give one house room but I'm not trying to sell them either. Lets just agree to disagree and not parlay; /archives//html/Amps/1998-11/msg00364.html (12,292 bytes)
40. [AMPS] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: RFpower@radiodan.com (Radiodan W7RF); Date: Sat, 28 Nov 1998 16:15:05 -0800; No battle, You know what they say opinions are like...... Everybodys got one. 73, Dan Magro W7RF, (member SCDXC, SCCC) Rugged, Reliable Henry HF Amps are "Instant on" for RF Power now! DXers/Conteste; /archives//html/Amps/1998-11/msg00365.html (14,379 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]