Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+3\-500\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+3\-500\'s\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] 3-500's (score: 1): Author: n1rj@pivot.net (Roger D. Johnson); Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1999 20:41:56 -0500; A friend is looking for a pair of 3-500's for his TL-922. Any consensus on which brands are good and/or which to avoid? 73, Roger -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amp; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00592.html (6,545 bytes)
2. [AMPS] 3-500's (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 01:44:15 -0800; ? RF Parts allegedly sells 3-500Zs that have a Mu (c. 130) that is similiar to the orig. Eimacs. Amperex tubes are ok, however, they have more Mu and require 0v bias, so the 922's zener will need to; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00604.html (6,972 bytes)
3. [Amps] 3-500's (score: 1): Author: "Chuck & Vicki Tifft" <cftifft@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:26:15 -0800; I have had a couple 3KA's and a 2K-4 (Peter Dahl) in the past that all run 3.8 to 3.9KV under load on the tubes and NEVER a problem. W6RD _______________________________________________ Amps mailing; /archives//html/Amps/2008-02/msg00117.html (6,261 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]