- 1. [AMPS] 3CX800s in MLA-2500 (score: 1)
- Author: k8cc@ix.netcom.com (David A. Pruett)
- Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 19:32:14 -0400
- However, this is not likely to be a conversion for the faint of heart. As K6GT pointed out, the mechanical cooling requirements are fundamentally different (axial vs. transverse) between 3CX800s and
- /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00367.html (8,479 bytes)
- 2. [AMPS] 3CX800s in MLA-2500 (score: 1)
- Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch)
- Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 08:40:09 +0000
- To: <amps@contesting.com> Hi Dave, Another thing to consider is two tubes require less airflow than a single tube, for a given output power in a given circuit. I doubt people are going to have enough
- /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00379.html (7,948 bytes)
- 3. [AMPS] 3CX800s in MLA-2500 (score: 1)
- Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
- Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 11:42:25 EDT
- Wouldn't it be easier to consider 8874's as the first option? They are often available as commercial pulls for reasonable money....and Svetlana is expected to produce them soon. It would be nice if t
- /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00388.html (9,809 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu