Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+4CX\-800s\s+vs\s+4CX1600s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+4CX\-800s\s+vs\s+4CX1600s\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] 4CX-800s vs 4CX1600s (score: 1): Author: k1ta@contesting.com (Bob Marston); Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 08:08:44 -0800; Greetings Steve and Group Here are my observations on the 800 vs 1600 issue. First the plate dissipation number speaks to one factor, the ability of the anode cooler to dissipate excess heat at a rat; /archives//html/Amps/2000-11/msg00001.html (8,078 bytes)
2. [AMPS] 4CX-800s vs 4CX1600s (score: 1): Author: kc4slk@csrlink.net (Mike Sawyer); Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 11:27:34 -0500; Bob, I'm sure George will eventually read this. The last time I contacted George there was some now-forgotten thread being dragged out ( as is usual the case here), and I in passing, asked him about; /archives//html/Amps/2000-02/msg00605.html (10,488 bytes)
3. [AMPS] 4CX-800s vs 4CX1600s (score: 1): Author: w8ik@arrl.net (Joe Subich, W8IK); Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 11:52:24 -0500; There are at least two US commercial manufacturers using the 4CX1600B. TenTec in the Titan II, and QRO Technologies in the HF-3KDX series. 73, ... Joe Subich, W8IK/4 <W8IK@ARRL.NET> -- FAQ on WWW: h; /archives//html/Amps/2000-02/msg00606.html (7,703 bytes)
4. [AMPS] 4CX-800s vs 4CX1600s (score: 1): Author: gdaught6@leland.Stanford.EDU (George T. Daughters); Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 08:09:33 -0800; < snip > Ten-Tec and QRO now offer amps based on the 4cx1600b. Svetlana has, indeed, had difficulty with delivery. Maybe that's fixed now. I don't know. Here's an update. The "Sunnyvale/St. Petersbur; /archives//html/Amps/2000-02/msg00632.html (8,635 bytes)
5. [AMPS] 4CX-800s vs 4CX1600s (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:07:08 -0700; I have never heard an amplifier that had an RF actuated ECBS which sounded other than the feculence you described, George. The problem with RF actuation is that during Tx, the bias rapidly switches; /archives//html/Amps/2000-02/msg00636.html (9,071 bytes)
6. [AMPS] 4CX-800s vs 4CX1600s (score: 1): Author: nasfred@1bigred.com (Nancy Sims); Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 21:59:58 -0500; Been using the 4CX1600B at 1500 watts for several years for RTTY contesting along with serving as net control for the Midwest RTTY Net every Thursday. No trouble with the tube. -- FAQ on WWW: http://; /archives//html/Amps/2000-02/msg00642.html (9,572 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]