Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+572b\'s\s+as\s+a\s+robust\s+oscillator\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+572b\'s\s+as\s+a\s+robust\s+oscillator\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] 572b's as a robust oscillator (score: 1): Author: krr2ak@juno.com (Jerry Devine); Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 07:07:18 UTC; Not sure, Can not find any data here on the 572-b in regards to this. I'm sure it's writen down some where, I just haven't found the hiding place... But I can tell you that 8000pf and it shunted by; /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00434.html (8,792 bytes)
2. [AMPS] 572b's as a robust oscillator (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 12:35:31 -0400; Not a chance it will be the same on 50 MHz, the stray capacitances and lead inductances will change it greatly. 73, Tom W8JI w8ji@contesting.com -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html; /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00442.html (7,662 bytes)
3. [AMPS] 572b's as a robust oscillator (score: 1): Author: wb8jkr@juno.com (Mark S Graalman); Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 15:48:50 EDT; 8000pf and .1 uH on 1.8 Mhz??!!!!!!!!! Mark WB8JKR ___________________________________________________________________ Get the Internet just the way you want it. Free software, free e-mail, and free; /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00443.html (7,495 bytes)
4. [AMPS] 572b's as a robust oscillator (score: 1): Author: krr2ak@juno.com (Jerry Devine); Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 23:56:38 UTC; Thanks for pointing this error out Mark. 8000pf and 1.0µh are the correct values. Scaled to 50.1 Mhz I calculated they would be near 295pf and .0342µh then use yeole grid dip meter to fi; /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00448.html (7,749 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]