Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+811H\'s\s+on\s+CB\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+811H\'s\s+on\s+CB\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] 811H's on CB (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 15:31:47 -0400; I'm disturbed by the posts from our "friend" in Texas that a lot of 811H amplifiers are turning up on CB. I'm trying to think of a solution for this problem. I'm considering suggesting parts be left; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00451.html (8,102 bytes)
2. [AMPS] 811H's on CB (score: 1): Author: watson@epiloglaser.com (George K. Watson); Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 13:48:44 -0600; Unfortunately, there is no way to police this activity effectively as there would always be amateur licensee/CB enthusiast crossovers to defeat Mr. Rauch's proposed solution. There is probably no sol; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00454.html (8,160 bytes)
3. [AMPS] 811H's on CB (score: 1): Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (michael watts); Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 13:07:28 -0700 (PDT); It seems to me that refusing to perform repair work, whether warranty or not, without proof of a ham license is a reasonable voluntary action that the amp makers could engage in. It wouldn't all of t; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00456.html (9,645 bytes)
4. [AMPS] 811H's on CB (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 20:38:38 -0400; Some years ago I did that with an amplifier owned by a California lawyer, because he had no license and used the amp to run communications on an amateur band in off road races somewhere in the deser; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00465.html (8,874 bytes)
5. [AMPS] 811H's on CB (score: 1): Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (michael watts); Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 18:05:47 -0700 (PDT); Hi Tom, I can't help with the actual legal advice. But if you get to the point where you are getting legal advice on this issue, you might also investigate the feasibility of "terms of sale" that inc; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00469.html (10,316 bytes)
6. [AMPS] 811H's on CB (score: 1): Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (michael watts); Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 18:20:25 -0700 (PDT); Tom, Another thought, and I know this is pushing the limits a bit: Since we have broad latitude in the terms of license that we grant for software, is it possible that this idea could be extended to; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00471.html (13,056 bytes)
7. [AMPS] 811H's on CB (score: 1): Author: kc5ajx@hotmail.com (Rick Bullon); Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 01:52:42 GMT; Hello Tom I brought this subject up with Mr Hollingsworth office awhile ago suggesting that the FCC change the rules stating that you had to have a General class license to buy an amp ( Tech Plus and; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00472.html (10,956 bytes)
8. [AMPS] 811H's on CB (score: 1): Author: da_kang@hotmail.com (Jeff Wolf); Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 15:46:13 GMT; Well, design the amplifier so it isn't so easy to modify for 10/11 meter operation. Simple enough fix. The "green wire" modification was so simple that most CBers that wanna run high power can figur; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00485.html (13,027 bytes)
9. [AMPS] 811H's on CB (score: 1): Author: Wt8r@aol.com (Wt8r@aol.com); Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 16:37:21 EDT; Well, design the amplifier so it isn't so easy to modify for 10/11 meter operation. Simple enough fix. The "green wire" modification was so simple that most CBers that wanna run high power can figure; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00498.html (14,974 bytes)
10. [AMPS] 811H's on CB (score: 1): Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (michael watts); Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 15:58:53 -0700 (PDT); You misunderstand the point of my suggestion to license the "use" of the amp. It was not my intention to imply that CBers would refrain from using such an amp because the of the license agreement, pe; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00501.html (16,127 bytes)
11. [AMPS] 811H's on CB (score: 1): Author: Eric Dobrowansky" <kk2ed@adelphia.net (Eric Dobrowansky); Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 20:29:08 -0400; Flame suit on........ (I DO NOT promote such activity, but I am also not blind to the real world!) I love listening to fellow hams complain about CBers encroaching on 10 or 12m. Hams just love to "bl; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00505.html (15,315 bytes)
12. [AMPS] 811H's on CB (score: 1): Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (michael watts); Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 17:41:50 -0700 (PDT); You understate the interference problem. Here in Northern California the lower 25Khz of 10meters is filled with CBers on AM and SSB. There have two instances in the last week where I was unable to wo; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00506.html (16,836 bytes)
13. [AMPS] 811H's on CB (score: 1): Author: Wt8r@aol.com (Wt8r@aol.com); Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 21:04:18 EDT; What a bunch of COD SWALLOP...to hear you tell it, CB'ers know everything and Hams know nothing. My guess is that most CB'ers have trouble telling their right hand from their left. Yeah, and I'd rath; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00508.html (9,932 bytes)
14. [AMPS] 811H's on CB (score: 1): Author: w2fca@qsl.net (Frank Ayers); Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 21:23:31 -0400; During one 1010 CW contest I heard no less than 10 different conversations in the low end of ten, including one that proudly announced he was "Pirate Radio #1". There are good shooting hunters who ig; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00509.html (9,288 bytes)
15. [AMPS] 811H's on CB (score: 1): Author: da_kang@hotmail.com (Jeff Wolf); Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 14:19:13 GMT; No, it isn't. I was posting to Tom that if he wanted the 11 meter opps to stop using his amplifiers on the 11 meter band, don't make it so easy to modify. If he TRULY does care, and is not posting t; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00524.html (15,960 bytes)
16. [AMPS] 811H's on CB (score: 1): Author: k7dd@earthlink.net (Mike Baker); Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 09:26:55 -0700; Hello Tom and the group, I am reading your e-mail a few days late so I may have not seen most or even any of the replies yet but here is my nickels worth of thought on the subject. During the "70s I; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00534.html (14,518 bytes)
17. [AMPS] 811H's on CB (score: 1): Author: n3hrt@us.hsanet.net (Martin Gary); Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 12:44:53 -0400; That was OUTSTANDING! I couldn't agree more. Finally someone with some common sense! Martin - N3HRT Hello Tom and the group, I am reading your e-mail a few days late so I may have not seen most or ev; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00536.html (13,413 bytes)
18. [AMPS] 811H's on CB (score: 1): Author: Nice_guy@Mindspring.com (Barry); Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 18:35:17 -0400; I concur with Eric totally, I am pushin 30 years as a Ham and Amateur Radio was my entry into electronics as a teen. Not CB. I really don't C modern Ham Radio that much diff from CB when I tune both; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00552.html (10,222 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]