Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+A\s+look\s+underneath\s+the\s+Ugly\s+amp\.\s+chassis\.\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] A look underneath the Ugly amp. chassis. (score: 1)
Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures)
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 08:59:50 -0700
I added a chassis view of the Ugly amp. to my Web site. Warning. This is a high-res JPEG file, so it takes a while to download. However, you can pretty much see what's what. The grid roller coil [fro
/archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00108.html (9,563 bytes)

2. [AMPS] A look underneath the Ugly amp. chassis. (score: 1)
Author: mike@g0mjw.freeserve.co.uk (G0MJW)
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 17:12:33 -0000
It didn't download at all with Netscape. However with IE5 it did. I can't see the parasitic suppressors. What is the specification ? It looks like an 8877. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/a
/archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00110.html (8,395 bytes)

3. [AMPS] A look underneath the Ugly amp. chassis. (score: 1)
Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures)
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 09:43:47 -0700
2A @ 7kV. VHF suppression was discussed in a previous post. cheers - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting
/archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00114.html (8,752 bytes)

4. [AMPS] A look underneath the Ugly amp. chassis. (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 1999 16:20:50 -0600
WHY? Why would a rheostat stop doing what a rheostat is supposed to do??? I agree with your comment. I am surprised though that the caps are that poor. I know even most "quality RF" caps (mica or oth
/archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00118.html (9,242 bytes)

5. [AMPS] A look underneath the Ugly amp. chassis. (score: 1)
Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures)
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 15:45:40 -0700
? Hang onto your hat. The nichrome resistance wire that the rheostat was made from was subject to disintegration from atmospheric effects. The graphite contact in the movable arm would crumble. The
/archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00120.html (10,130 bytes)

6. [AMPS] A look underneath the Ugly amp. chassis. (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 1999 19:16:23 -0600
So according to these "experts" a rheostat is not capable of varying the magnitude of an AC voltage. Go figure. Hey, I have a rheostat on my filament AND on my HV primary. Poor is a relative term. I
/archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00124.html (11,038 bytes)

7. [AMPS] A look underneath the Ugly amp. chassis. (score: 1)
Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures)
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 21:18:05 -0700
A rheostat in the HV transformer primary is bananas. poor. I disagree. You gotta short the cap with wide Cu foil and measure the resonance with a dipmeter.. cheers, Jon - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.
/archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00127.html (11,104 bytes)

8. [AMPS] A look underneath the Ugly amp. chassis. (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 1999 00:10:40 -0600
Why? Too much loss? Granted, you might not need to use it very often if ever, but I can set my operating voltage to be whatever I want it to be. No, it isn't changed, and I probably wouldn't change i
/archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00128.html (9,574 bytes)

9. [AMPS] A look underneath the Ugly amp. chassis. (score: 1)
Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures)
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 22:29:10 -0700
No. The current is not semi-constant. . ? Never, ever. All the rheostat can do is create unregulation. ? And when the anode current changes, what then? - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measure
/archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00129.html (9,265 bytes)

10. [AMPS] A look underneath the Ugly amp. chassis. (score: 1)
Author: mike@g0mjw.freeserve.co.uk (G0MJW)
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 08:51:29 -0000
No, because it will wreck the regulation. Most amp PSUs use capacative filters after the rectifier to provide the HV supply. A feature of capacative filtering is the high ratio of the peak current s
/archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00134.html (9,765 bytes)

11. [AMPS] A look underneath the Ugly amp. chassis. (score: 1)
Author: wb8jkr@juno.com (Mark S Graalman)
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 04:51:53 -0500
Are we sure the "rheostat" isn't in the HV metering divider to adjust the HV meter? That would make a damm site more sense. Mark WB8JKR _______________________________________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00138.html (10,198 bytes)

12. [AMPS] A look underneath the Ugly amp. chassis. (score: 1)
Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures)
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 05:00:12 -0700
Yes. The rheostat is a 50w unit. It is in the primary of the filament transformer. - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions:
/archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00141.html (10,854 bytes)

13. SV: [AMPS] A look underneath the Ugly amp. chassis. (score: 1)
Author: sm5ki@algonet.se (Hans Goldschmidt)
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 1999 14:16:15 +0100
I remember seeing in QST a primary voltage regulator ( with tyristors ) sensing the secondary high voltage by means of a voltage divider. Much better than a reostat or a Variac. In a filament stabili
/archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00142.html (10,894 bytes)

14. [AMPS] A look underneath the Ugly amp. chassis. (score: 1)
Author: wb8jkr@juno.com (Mark S Graalman)
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 11:26:26 -0500
I know Rich, I was talking about the one Jon claimed to have in his HV supply. Mark WB8JKR ___________________________________________________________________ Get the Internet just the way you want i
/archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00149.html (9,145 bytes)

15. [AMPS] A look underneath the Ugly amp. chassis. (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 1999 13:40:38 -0600
Oh! Duh! Wake up and smell the coffee, Jon...... :-) My mistake in terminology. Yes, yes, yes, of course you would want to use a variac and not a rheostat in the HV primary. And that is what I use -
/archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00153.html (9,886 bytes)

16. [AMPS] A look underneath the Ugly amp. chassis. (score: 1)
Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson)
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 21:37:32 -0000
--Original Message-- From: Hans Goldschmidt <sm5ki@algonet.se> To: G0MJW <mike@g0mjw.freeserve.co.uk>; Jon Ogden <jono@enteract.com>; AMPS <amps@contesting.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: 04 Nov
/archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00176.html (8,743 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu