Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+AL1500\s+vs\s+Alpha91b\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+AL1500\s+vs\s+Alpha91b\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] AL1500 vs Alpha91b (score: 1): Author: j-benson2@ti.com" <j-benson2@ti.com (Jim Benson); Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 13:31:45 -0600; Heard watts performance cushion approx. 1.5X more in favor of Alpha 91b, based on large power supply,etc. Have seen narrowest price gap about $300 Alpha being more. 73, Jim/N5ZAI --Original Message--; /archives//html/Amps/1998-03/msg00047.html (7,474 bytes)
2. [AMPS] AL1500 vs Alpha91b (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 15:18:25 -0500; How about an SB-220 and an FT-1000MP ;^} 73, Pete N4ZR In Wild Wonderful, fairly rare WEST Virginia -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrativ; /archives//html/Amps/1998-03/msg00049.html (7,205 bytes)
3. [AMPS] AL1500 vs Alpha91b (score: 1): Author: lane@glerl.noaa.gov (John Lane); Date: Fri, 2 Jan 1998 14:41:21 -0500; Certainly the QRO HF-2500DX deserves consideration in this group. It's been a fine amplifier in my service. -- W8KX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.c; /archives//html/Amps/1998-01/msg00139.html (8,045 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]